Peter Davis p...@pfdstudio.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 06:29:37PM -0600, John Hendy wrote:
This has come up before, and the answer is that it's not currently
possible with just Org. See the following [probably] duplicate
questions:
-
You can also use
latexmkhttp://users.phys.psu.edu/~collins/software/latexmk-jcc/which
was designed to solve this kind of problem.
I have this in my init.el
(setq org-latex-pdf-process
'(latexmk -pdflatex=xelatex -pdf -latexoption=-shell-escape %f))
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Nick
Hi Bastien,
Bastien wrote:
Sebastien Vauban writes:
This one is quite new: tangling a code block in `latex' language now
produces a file with a `.latex' extension, instead of the common
`.tex' extension.
AFAIU you need to (require 'ob-latex) first.
I never did that explicitly.
But, doing
Hello,
On Wednesday 29 January 2014 18:47:39 Robert Eckl wrote:
I wanted to play with it, but if I use
*M-x google-contacts*
and type string i get
google-oauth-auth-and-store: Symbol's function definition is void:
oauth2-auth-and-store
google-contacts requires oauth2.el version
Hello,
James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes:
I've written some emacs-lisp using org-element-map to iterate over
source code blocks in an org buffer and insert them into another
buffer, including a listing number and caption (so it's different from
tangling).
I was just trying to tweak
Hi,
This seems to be more general, since it also occurs for e.g. python
source blocks. Tangling a python source code block with the argument
=:tangle yes= produces a '.python' instead of a '.py' file (at least
with 8.2.5c).
Best wishes
Julian
On 01/29/2014 09:19 PM, Sebastien Vauban
Sebastien Vauban sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/idocf...@public.gmane.org
writes:
Would this be possible? If so, would you want that as well?
Reducing to {{...}} could be better, but I'm not sure this is
what will make your friends happy :)
Not entirely, no! But I think that'd be already a good
Sebastien Vauban sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/idocf...@public.gmane.org
writes:
;; (latex . t)
Yes, you need to uncomment this for the LaTeX source blocks to know
what extension to use.
--
Bastien
Julian Gehring julian.gehr...@gmail.com writes:
This seems to be more general, since it also occurs for e.g. python
source blocks. Tangling a python source code block with the argument
=:tangle yes= produces a '.python' instead of a '.py' file (at least
with 8.2.5c).
You need something like
Bastien wrote:
Sebastien Vauban writes:
Bastien wrote:
Reducing to {{...}} could be better, but I'm not sure this is
what will make your friends happy :)
Not entirely, no! But I think that'd be already a good
simplification.
Added to my will-silently-see-if-this-makes-progress list :)
Hi Thomas,
I just fixed one issue regarding the clock not being highlighted.
Let me know if you find other bugs.
Thanks,
--
Bastien
I am using eorgmode with beamer to create a slide presentation in German.
I get a nice outline page with the atuomatically created header
Outline
How can I change this so it becomes
Themen
??
Erich Neuwirth
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Hi Greg,
Soapy Smith soapy-sm...@comcast.net writes:
The problem is that the results inserted into the org document should be
tabularized.
This should now be fixed in master -- thanks for further testing,
and thanks to Eric for giving the solution.
--
Bastien
Hi Erich,
Erich Neuwirth erich.neuwi...@univie.ac.at writes:
I am using eorgmode with beamer to create a slide presentation in German.
I get a nice outline page with the atuomatically created header
Outline
How can I change this so it becomes
Themen
(setq org-beamer-outline-frame-title
Erich Neuwirth wrote:
I am using eorgmode with beamer to create a slide presentation in German.
I get a nice outline page with the atuomatically created header
Outline
How can I change this so it becomes
Themen
--8---cut here---start-8---
(setq
Hello,
It was said that Macro expansion is already recursive: the template can
be another macro. Though, my example does not work: the second macro
call is exported almost verbatim.
--8---cut here---start-8---
#+MACRO: highlight @@html:span
Hello,
Sebastien Vauban sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/idocf...@public.gmane.org
writes:
It was said that Macro expansion is already recursive: the template can
be another macro. Though, my example does not work: the second macro
call is exported almost verbatim.
#+MACRO: highlight @@html:span
Hello Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Sebastien Vauban writes:
It was said that Macro expansion is already recursive: the template can
be another macro. Though, my example does not work: the second macro
call is exported almost verbatim.
#+MACRO: highlight @@html:span
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 08:59:11AM +0100, Andreas Leha wrote:
This is not solving your original problem. But the following might
spare you from some manual work. It is a simple hack that uses
=imagemagick= to do the side-by-side composition.
Thanks very much, Andreas! This is a real
Great news!
I will update my system to the master.
I will create an org file with permutations of the :results option and
export to LaTeX and HTML. Perhaps even compare to Python behavior.
I will attempt to push the test files to github later today. I need the
git practice!
Regards,
Greg
On
When I think about priority I want to see if one item is more
prioritized then another. So if I have a list like this:
* TODO Not important
* TODO Really important
* TODO Kind of import
So setting in the priority would look like this :
* TODO 3 Not important
* TODO 1 Really important
* TODO 2
Sebastien Vauban sva-n...@mygooglest.com
writes:
Bastien wrote:
Sebastien Vauban writes:
Bastien wrote:
Reducing to {{...}} could be better, but I'm not sure this is
what will make your friends happy :)
Not entirely, no! But I think that'd be already a good
simplification.
Added to my
I found a bad link on http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html
The link ``skeletons'' points to an article on Nokia's phones on slashgear.com
A better link would be: http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/SkeletonMode
Mirko
Fredrik fred...@jumans.net writes:
When I think about priority I want to see if one item is more
prioritized then another. So if I have a list like this:
* TODO Not important
* TODO Really important
* TODO Kind of import
So setting in the priority would look like this :
* TODO 3 Not
That would be an idea and I have tried it but when adding a new item in
the list I manually need to change the priority for all the rest which
is too much work
Regards,
Fredrik
On 2014-01-30 16:51, Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
Fredrik fred...@jumans.net writes:
When I think about priority I
Fredrik fred...@jumans.net writes:
That would be an idea and I have tried it but when adding a new item
in the list I manually need to change the priority for all the rest
which is too much work
How many categories do you need?
Using ABC with :low: :medium: :high: tags or so you got already
El Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:49:59 +0100 Fredrik va escriure:
I know there is the ABC but that doesn't support what I shown here where I add
an item in the middle of the list changes the priority of everything below it?
If you consider section order as priority, then you already have it: when you
Hi List,
(headline) timestamps, deadlines, scheduled and closed items are parsed
into timestamp lists with the following attributes:
- timestamp-type
- start date
- start time
- end date
- end time
- repeater-type
- repeater-value
- repeater-unit
Not all attributes seem to make sense for each
Sebastien Vauban sva-n...@mygooglest.com
writes:
There is also backwards compatibility to consider.
How? You know, when many, many, many keywords or options changed
between Org 7.9 and Org 8.0, there was nothing to support backward
compatibility: much too complex, I guess.
Yes, indeed:
Nick Dokos ndo...@gmail.com writes:
Sebastien Vauban sva-n...@mygooglest.com
writes:
There is also backwards compatibility to consider.
Not only that, probability of false positives matters
too. E.g. inserting text snippets in PicoLisp Wiki Syntax into an Org
file could easily cause errors
Aloha Mirko,
Mirko Vukovic mirko.vuko...@gmail.com writes:
I found a bad link on http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html
The link ``skeletons'' points to an article on Nokia's phones on slashgear.com
You can fix it by sending your public key to Bastien and then
downloading the Worg sources:
I want to use org-mode as a (tea) database.
What have I done:
1. I have wrote down a tree of shops/orders/brands
2. I defined COLUMNS for Column View that give me a score per shop list
What do I want as result:
1. give me a list of scores for the shops [DONE]
2. give me a list of scores for
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com writes:
Is there any restriction in the use of planning/time info other than
common sense? If so, what are the ruled-out combinations and attribute
assignments?
Common sense applies, but it applies best to examples.
I guess the question is too
Nick Dokos ndo...@gmail.com writes:
No: I'm saying that if this change is implemented, {{{foo}}} should be
deprecated (probably raising a deprecation warning when encountered) and
that both {{foo}} and {{{foo}}} should work identically, at least until
the next major release (we can debate
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
Hi Bastien ,
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com writes:
Is there any restriction in the use of planning/time info other than
common sense? If so, what are the ruled-out combinations and attribute
assignments?
Common sense applies, but it applies best to
Sebastien Vauban writes:
When trying to convince colleagues and friends to use macros, I get
kind of allergic reactions because of the many accolades.
Example:
#+MACRO: hlt @@html:span style=background-color: yellow;$1/span@@
This {{{hlt(information)}}} is important.
I wondered
Hi Thorsten,
Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com writes:
1. can deadlines be time-ranges?
No.
2. in time-ranges, can both entries have repeaters?
No.
3. can deadline and closed have repeaters?
No.
4. are any combinations of deadline and scheduled valid?
Yes!
i.e. I want to find
On 30.01.2014 17:59, Nick Dokos wrote:
Are you advocating that the macro syntax should be changed without
worrying about backwards compatibility? That might work if almost nobody
uses macros currently[fn:1], but my impression is that they are used fairly
widely.
The main problem is that this
Florian Beck f...@miszellen.de writes:
3. Of course, since macros are only relevant when exporting, it should
be easy to write an export filter that translates arbitrary chars to
brackets.
I think this might be the way forward for Org mode users who don't like
the look of the current macro
Piotr Isajew pisa...@yahoo.com writes:
Hi Bastien,
Dnia 29.01.2014 Bastien b...@gnu.org napisał/a:
Piotr Isajew pisa...@yahoo.com writes:
For example, when I open .org file I would like to have subtrees
marked as DONE folded, but the others should be opened as with
#+STARTUP: content
I'm finding the documentation on LaTeX export a bit thin. Where, for example,
does the author's name come from? I noticed my documents do have my correct
name, but I don't know where it's coming from. I want to add some information.
I tried
#+LATEX_HEADER: \author{Peter Davis (addl info)}
but
Here are the files from testing of Clojure code blocks with the latest
master:
https://github.com/Greg-R/org-babel-clojure-tests?source=cc
The PDF file is the result of a LaTeX export.
The code blocks were forced to appear as they do in the org file by
wrapping them in begin_example/end_example.
On Jan 30, 2014 7:36 PM, Peter Davis p...@pfdstudio.com wrote:
I'm finding the documentation on LaTeX export a bit thin. Where, for
example, does the author's name come from? I noticed my documents do have
my correct name, but I don't know where it's coming from. I want to add
some information.
Im having an issue with inconsistent vertical space
If I do latex export \\es at eol produce blank lines
However with html export they appear in output but not consistently
org version 8.2.5e
emacs version 24.3.1
Below a cut-down version from a file I see it happening
#+TITLE:
Rustom Mody rustompm...@gmail.com writes:
Im having an issue with inconsistent vertical space
If I do latex export \\es at eol produce blank lines
However with html export they appear in output but not consistently
org version 8.2.5e
emacs version 24.3.1
Below a cut-down version from a
Greetings,
I'm sure this is just a variable I've overlooked, but I'm wondering if
it's possible to export code blocks as they appear, with whitespace
preserved for better formatting in the resultant LaTeX document (I'm
using Beamer in this case).
Currently, the leading spaces in my blocks seem
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Ken Okada keno.s...@gmail.com wrote:
John,
Thanks for advising.
On Org 7.8.11, placement=[l] and placement={l} parameter does not make
sense for tables as I tried.
I tried to install the current version. (There was a compile error
arising from the fact
Nick wrote:
Why exactly the last one is parsed as a literal string and not as a line
break, I don't know. Nicolas will probably explain all. The only thing I
can say is that if there is something other than whitespace on the line
before the \\, it gets parsed as a line break; if there is only
John Hendy jw.he...@gmail.com writes:
I'm having a tough time finding info on LaTeX with what makes a table
left or right aligned (not the columns, but the table itself). Most of
the hits are on how to *center* the table, which seems to suggest they
will be left aligned by default.
Does
49 matches
Mail list logo
