Re: [O] Heads-up: test failures

2017-02-14 Thread Colin Baxter
Hi Nick On Tue, Feb 14 2017, Nick Dokos wrote: > Colin Baxter writes: > >> On Tue, Feb 14 2017, Nick Dokos wrote: >> >>> Colin Baxter writes: >>> On Mon, Feb 13 2017, Nick Dokos wrote: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: >

Re: [O] Heads-up: test failures

2017-02-14 Thread Vladimir Lomov
Hello, ** John Hendy [2017-02-14 20:32:59 -0600]: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Nick Dokos wrote: >> I just updated to >> >> Org mode version 9.0.5 (release_9.0.5-260-geb59c7 @ >> /home/nick/elisp/org-mode/lisp/) >> >> and `make test' gives me: > > Since others are

Re: [O] Heads-up: test failures

2017-02-14 Thread John Hendy
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Nick Dokos wrote: > I just updated to > > Org mode version 9.0.5 (release_9.0.5-260-geb59c7 @ > /home/nick/elisp/org-mode/lisp/) > > and `make test' gives me: Since others are adding in to the party! I ran after a fresh pull on my normal

Re: [O] modify/edit a org-time-stamp

2017-02-14 Thread Bingo
On February 15, 2017 4:06:03 AM GMT+05:30, Nick Dokos wrote: >Uwe Brauer writes: > >> Hi >> >> I have an org file which is full of time-stamps from last year stuff >> like <2016-11-14 Sat>. I thought I could easily modify/edit the time >> stamp but I cannot,

Re: [O] Update for MobileOrg iOS v1.7 released

2017-02-14 Thread Sean Escriva
Hi Alan, I'm not the maintainer of org-mobile.el so unfortunately can't help too much with that, although I have done a decent amount of reading in that code I can't claim to understand all of it. If you do find bugs fixing them would be much appreciated as I would indirectly benefit :) sorry I

Re: [O] modify/edit a org-time-stamp

2017-02-14 Thread Nick Dokos
Uwe Brauer writes: > Hi > > I have an org file which is full of time-stamps from last year stuff > like <2016-11-14 Sat>. I thought I could easily modify/edit the time > stamp but I cannot, every time I move the cursor into such a stamp, I > cannot edit as I wish. It looks as

Re: [O] Using CEDET modules from Emacs core

2017-02-14 Thread Stefan Monnier
>> "Semantic is too slow for C++" complaint (e.g. compared to Clang-based >> background process solutions) is unlikely to go away. > While I haven't had time to work on CEDET lately, I'd be happy to discuss > specific performance issues and share ideas on how to improve them, > presumably after

Re: [O] Heads-up: test failures

2017-02-14 Thread Colin Baxter
On Tue, Feb 14 2017, Nick Dokos wrote: > Colin Baxter writes: > >> On Mon, Feb 13 2017, Nick Dokos wrote: >> >>> Nicolas Goaziou writes: >>> What is the failure in each case? >>> >> snip >> >> Ran 711 tests, 711 results as expected

Re: [O] Heads-up: test failures

2017-02-14 Thread Nick Dokos
Colin Baxter writes: > On Tue, Feb 14 2017, Nick Dokos wrote: > >> Colin Baxter writes: >> >>> On Mon, Feb 13 2017, Nick Dokos wrote: >>> Nicolas Goaziou writes: > What is the failure in each case? >>> snip

Re: [O] org-annotate/collaboration?

2017-02-14 Thread Uwe Brauer
> Uwe Brauer writes: > I think collaborators who have even a tiny familiarity with > technological tools make the whole process much, much easier. > Unfortunately I'm working with technophobes, the sort of people who > call the browser "the internet", so I have

[O] modify/edit a org-time-stamp

2017-02-14 Thread Uwe Brauer
Hi I have an org file which is full of time-stamps from last year stuff like <2016-11-14 Sat>. I thought I could easily modify/edit the time stamp but I cannot, every time I move the cursor into such a stamp, I cannot edit as I wish. It looks as if that entry is somehow blocked. Of course I

Re: [O] Problems exporting simple LaTeX math to HTML

2017-02-14 Thread Richard Stanton
That works. Thanks. > On Feb 14, 2017, at 12:24 PM, Charles C. Berry wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Richard Stanton wrote: > >> [My apologies if this is a repeat. I tried posting this 4 days ago and >> didn’t see if appear on the list.] >> >> I created the following very

Re: [O] Problems exporting simple LaTeX math to HTML

2017-02-14 Thread Charles C. Berry
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Richard Stanton wrote: [My apologies if this is a repeat. I tried posting this 4 days ago and didn’t see if appear on the list.] I created the following very simple org file: #+TITLE: *Math example* \[ w_j = \nu_j \prod_{l

Re: [O] Problems exporting simple LaTeX math to HTML

2017-02-14 Thread Nick Dokos
Richard Stanton writes: > [My apologies if this is a repeat. I tried posting this 4 days ago and didn’t > see if appear on the list.] > > I created the following very simple org file: > > > > #+TITLE: *Math example* > > \[ w_j = \nu_j \prod_{l

Re: [O] Help checking orgcard.pdf

2017-02-14 Thread Nick Dokos
dbo...@mmm.com (J. David Boyd) writes: > Thanks very much. orgcard_letter printed just fine. I didn't even know that > was there. Perhaps it is new? Anyway, orgcard still too far to right, but > orgcard_letter is perfect, and since letter sized is what I'm printing on, I'm > happy. >

[O] basic spreadsheet question

2017-02-14 Thread Jude DaShiell
When currency is calculated, is it possible in org-mode to have a "$" prefix on currency amounts? --

[O] Problems exporting simple LaTeX math to HTML

2017-02-14 Thread Richard Stanton
[My apologies if this is a repeat. I tried posting this 4 days ago and didn’t see if appear on the list.] I created the following very simple org file: #+TITLE: *Math example* \[ w_j = \nu_j \prod_{l

Re: [O] reverting to level 4 text

2017-02-14 Thread Sharon Kimble
Eric S Fraga writes: > On Saturday, 11 Feb 2017 at 18:23, Sharon Kimble wrote: >> Or, in other words, how can I kill the level 5 heading after >> "(cite:0580)" so that "Data confirms that ..." is under a level 4 >> heading please? > > You cannot. There are no "terminating"

Re: [O] Help checking orgcard.pdf

2017-02-14 Thread J. David Boyd
Thanks very much. orgcard_letter printed just fine. I didn't even know that was there. Perhaps it is new? Anyway, orgcard still too far to right, but orgcard_letter is perfect, and since letter sized is what I'm printing on, I'm happy. Thanks for the info, made my day! Dave

Re: [O] Heads-up: test failures

2017-02-14 Thread Nick Dokos
Colin Baxter writes: > On Mon, Feb 13 2017, Nick Dokos wrote: > >> Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> >>> What is the failure in each case? >> > snip > > Ran 711 tests, 711 results as expected (2017-02-14 07:58:32+) > 8 expected failures > >

Re: [O] Help checking orgcard.pdf

2017-02-14 Thread Nick Dokos
dbo...@mmm.com (J. David Boyd) writes: > I'm not sure what got changed, but now when I compile and print the orgcard, I > get a left margin that is too big, and text is pushed off the card to the > right. > > Any idea where to set margins in tex files? Or is that something I should > never have

Re: [O] Help checking orgcard.pdf

2017-02-14 Thread J. David Boyd
I'm not sure what got changed, but now when I compile and print the orgcard, I get a left margin that is too big, and text is pushed off the card to the right. Any idea where to set margins in tex files? Or is that something I should never have to deal with? It was printing fine in prior

Re: [O] [ox-html, patch] More newlines around lists

2017-02-14 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Rasmus writes: > Good; I pushed the patch. Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] [ox-html, patch] More newlines around lists

2017-02-14 Thread Rasmus
> Gotcha: #'format Jeez... > LGTM. Good; I pushed the patch. Rasmus -- Human: An animal that complicates things more than strictly necessary

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

2017-02-14 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Rasmus writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Thank you. Some minor comments below. Feel free to push whenever you >> think this is good enough. > > OK, I pushed the patch. Thank you. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] [ox-html, patch] More newlines around lists

2017-02-14 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Rasmus writes: > This patch inserts more newlines around lists, and thus makes the source a > bit more readable (IMO). It's an almost purely cosmetic change. Thank you. > Can I apply this or are the newlines left out on purpose? > + (apply 'format "<%s

[O] [ox-html, patch] More newlines around lists

2017-02-14 Thread Rasmus
Hi, This patch inserts more newlines around lists, and thus makes the source a bit more readable (IMO). It's an almost purely cosmetic change. Can I apply this or are the newlines left out on purpose? Rasmus -- Hvor meget poesi tror De kommer ud af et glas isvand? >From

Re: [O] Feature request: lists with letters

2017-02-14 Thread Rasmus
Hi, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Thank you. Some minor comments below. Feel free to push whenever you > think this is good enough. OK, I pushed the patch. >> +(defconst org-html-plain-list-type >> + '(ordered "ol" unordered "ul" descriptive "dl") >> + "Plist of Org and

Re: [O] Heads-up: test failures

2017-02-14 Thread Colin Baxter
On Mon, Feb 13 2017, Nick Dokos wrote: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> What is the failure in each case? > snip Ran 711 tests, 711 results as expected (2017-02-14 07:58:32+) 8 expected failures org-mode release_9.0.5-282-g2e32709 emacs-25.1.1;

Re: [O] [ANN] New Org duration library

2017-02-14 Thread Detlef Steuer
Yes, works now! Many thx! Detlef Am Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:01:52 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou : > Hello, > > Detlef Steuer writes: > > > after updating org this morning from git I get: > > > > org-duration-to-minutes: Invalid duration format: "

Re: [O] [ANN] New Org duration library

2017-02-14 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Detlef Steuer writes: > after updating org this morning from git I get: > > org-duration-to-minutes: Invalid duration format: " 9:00" > > if I try to invoke my agenda with C-c a a > > What gives me headaches: I don't use, AFAIK, durations anywhere > and a grep

Re: [O] [ANN] New Org duration library

2017-02-14 Thread Detlef Steuer
Dear Nicolas, after updating org this morning from git I get: org-duration-to-minutes: Invalid duration format: " 9:00" if I try to invoke my agenda with C-c a a What gives me headaches: I don't use, AFAIK, durations anywhere and a grep over my org files shows *no* occurence of " 9:00". This