Hi,
I am new to emacs and orgmode. I spent the last couple days reading most
of the docs before diving in, but I didn't see anywhere how I could have a
macro that instead of replacing the macro with lisp code, calls an
external program instead.
Something like:
#+MACRO: func call
On 10/03/2019 11:19, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> When in doubt, use the function ~org-link-escape~ in order to turn
> a link string into its properly escaped form.
>
> The old ~org-link-escape~ and ~org-link-unescape~ functions have
> been renamed into ~org-link-encode~ and
On 2019-03-10 1:02 PM, Samuel Wales wrote:
> the org capture firefox extensions, and similar extensions, or
> org-protocol, might need changing.
>
>
[...]
Also seems like there are a couple more internal Org functions that need
changing: when opening a new empty org file using latest Org
Hello,
Nikolay Kudryavtsev writes:
> I was able to debug the Icicles interaction bug:
>
> In org-dblock-write:clocktable there's a check ((pred functionp)
> (funcall scope)) which checks whether the scope is a function. Since
> the default scope is currently "file", it gets funcalled. Icicles
>
Hello,
Vadim Zaliva writes:
> Yes, that helped.
OK. I pushed that change. Thank you for the feedback.
> If there is a way to file a bug report without subscribing to the mailing
> list?
> I subscribed to the list just to report this bug and unsubscribed
> since.
You can send an email to the
the org capture firefox extensions, and similar extensions, or
org-protocol, might need changing.
On 3/10/19, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I finally pushed changed about escape syntax in bracket links. Here is
> the excerpt from ORG-NEWS:
>
> Org used to percent-encode sensitive
Hello,
Eric S Fraga writes:
> Hello,
>
> motivated by having just watched this video,
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=479=BLomb52wjvE
>
> I decided to play around a bit with detangling.
>
> When I try, it takes some time to get to the original src block. Even
> though the
pierre.techouey...@free.fr (Pierre Téchoueyres) writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>> Could you send a complete version of the patch?
>
> What dou you think of the attached one ?
Perfect.
Applied. Thank you.
Hello,
I finally pushed changed about escape syntax in bracket links. Here is
the excerpt from ORG-NEWS:
Org used to percent-encode sensitive characters in the URI part of the
bracket links.
Now, escaping mechanism uses the usual backslash character, according
to the following
Hello Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> ...
>> Is simple diffs an acceptable format for patches or should I send you an
>> fully formatted git commit ?
>
> The latter, please.
>
> Could you send a complete version of the patch?
What dou you think of the attached one ?
Regards,
Pierre
>From
Hello,
Carlos Pita writes:
> Hi all,
>
> there is a problem in this kind of logic:
>
> (cond ((not ta) +1)
> ((not tb) -1)
> ((string-lessp ta tb) -1)
> ((string-lessp tb ta) +1
>
> in that when both ta and tb are nil then they are arbitrarily sorted.
> Since the
Hello,
pierre.techouey...@free.fr (Pierre Téchoueyres) writes:
> Thanks for your quick action. I've also written another test for
> this patch. Would you mind adding it too ?
Thank you for the patch.
> Is simple diffs an acceptable format for patches or should I send you an
> fully formatted
Hello,
Nikolay Kudryavtsev writes:
> It's not a big deal by any means, but maybe the manual should be
> improved, since it has leftovers from laxer times. I wouldn't expect
> users to know that dblocks properties should be a proper plist, so
> reminding them is probably a good idea.
>
> So for
13 matches
Mail list logo
