Hi Andy and Kyle,
Kyle Meyer writes:
> Andy Klock writes:
>
>> Hi all, am I too late?
>>
>> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
>> On Monday, October 26, 2020 4:07 AM, Bastien wrote:
>>
>>> If you feel like proposing yourself for maintaining an Org Babel
>>> language, that would be super helpful.
dalanicolai writes:
> Hello, sorry for sending this email directly, but currently sending mail
> from Emacs does not work correctly.
No worries. There's no requirement to send it from Emacs.
[...]
> It would be great if these two small point in the manual, which is
> otherwise great, could
>
Julian M. Burgos writes:
> I have not noticed that org-tree-to-indirect-buffer
> reuses the indirect buffer when you call it for a second time.
> According to the manual, "with a C-u prefix, do not remove the
> previously used indirect buffer", but that does not seem to work.
> When you do
Kyle Meyer writes:
> Thanks for the patch. Ideally someone that uses macOS would provide a
> review. Based on the history of the file, I've cc'd two people that may
> be willing/able to do so.
Applied (afd75d05a). Thanks again.
Sébastien Miquel writes:
> Priority cookies are always in a headline.
>
> The attached patch speeds up fontification of a 1k lines buffer by 0.1
> second.
Thank. Pushed (a03b4656c), adding this...
> Note that the variable org-priority-regexp can't be modified since
> it is used in the agenda
Hi Nathan,
On 2021-02-20 at 11:10 -08, Nathan Neff wrote...
> I have some code like this:
>
> * Heading 1
>
> # code block name:FOO
>
> ** Subheading 1
>
> # code block
>
> ** Subheading 2
>
> # code block
>
> I find that I often want to evaluate the code in Heading 1 and its
> subheadings.
>
>
Hi Julian,
"Julian M. Burgos" writes:
> This does not seem to be a limitation from emacs, as it is possible to
> open multiple indirect buffers from a base buffer, using for example
> clone-indirect-buffer. So it should be possible to make a function
> combining "clone-indirect-buffer" and
Hi Juan,
You are right. :) I have not noticed that org-tree-to-indirect-buffer reuses
the indirect buffer when you call it for a second time. According to the
manual, "with a C-u prefix, do not remove the previously used indirect buffer",
but that does not seem to work. When you do
Hi Julian, thanks for your comment.
"Julian M. Burgos" writes:
> Thank you, although I tested your functions and compared with the
> original org-tree-to-indirect-buffer, the only difference I see is
> that your function creates a new exwm workspace. The original function
> already creates
Hi Juan Manuel,
Thank you, although I tested your functions and compared with the original
org-tree-to-indirect-buffer, the only difference I see is that your function
creates a new exwm workspace. The original function already creates indirect
buffers with their own names (using a slash
Hi,
Since EXWM uses Emacs frames as virtual desktops, I have written this
alternative method of `org-tree-to-indirect-buffer', which I share here.
With this method I can have several isolated trees, with their own name,
and access them quickly (with helm-buffer-list, for example):
#+begin_src
11 matches
Mail list logo
