Barry has shown how to use "C-c C-x C-l" (org-latex-preview ARG)
to preview a latex fragment at point.
I then see no point in enclosing latex commands in "#+begin_src" and
"#+end_src";
because one can just write any lates expression an a line such as below, them
slamming
it with "C-c C-x C-l".
Hi Krupal,
thanks a lot for offering to maintain Worg! Very much appreciated,
I'm confident this is very good news for anyone relying on Worg.
Please send me an email with the username you want for an account
on https://code.orgmode.org, I will then add you as a committer.
Best,
--
Bastien
Hi Tom,
that's really kind of you! Thanks a lot.
If other people share the last name of original authors of
ob-* files, please raise your voice and ask for your share :)
Best,
--
Bastien
Hi Jonas,
thanks a lot for your guidance, I've committed your version.
Thanks!
--
Bastien
Another downside is that you got to slam "C-c C-x C-l" for every equation one
writes
in the drawer. The solution is not very usable but at least I could display
equations
as I do with texinfo from org. But for serious work, I need to be fast.
Currently
it will be frustrating enough for
--text follows this line--
Drawers as I understand them should be hidden in any output at least
that is what the build-in drawers do.
Also from what I understand is that you don't have to "declare" custom
drawers any more.
When I try to use a custom drawer and export to HTML the contents of the
Would people help me have a keybinding that changes the scale in
cyclic sequence, e.g. 2 3 4 5 4 3 2
Regards
> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2021 at 3:18 PM
> From: "Berry, Charles"
> To: "michael-franz...@gmx.com"
> Cc: "Help Emacs Orgmode"
> Subject: Re: displaying equations with ob-latex
>
>
>
> >
The default does not work very well because as I zoom the text, the equation
remains the same height.
Could this playing around with drawers be eliminated, so things will behave as
when
using texinfo with @display using mathjax. It also allows you to zoom in and
out
hard without any harm.
>
> On May 6, 2021, at 7:39 PM, michael-franz...@gmx.com wrote:
>
> Ok, I got some progress, I did "C-C C-x C-l" and got the equation.
>
Great!
> The equation in extremely small though.
>
Try customizing `org-format-latex-options'. The :scale element controls size. I
tried 2.0 and it
michael-franz...@gmx.com writes:
> Ok, I got some progress, I did "C-C C-x C-l" and got the equation.
>
> The equation in extremely small though.
By default, it should have the same height with you text line.
You can change it though. I have the following snippet in my config:
(setq
Ok, I got some progress, I did "C-C C-x C-l" and got the equation.
The equation in extremely small though.
> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2021 at 1:36 PM
> From: "Berry, Charles"
> To: "michael-franz...@gmx.com"
> Cc: "Help Emacs Orgmode"
> Subject: Re: displaying equations with ob-latex
>
>
>
> >
I get
#+RESULTS: eqn1
:results:
\(y = x\beta + \epsilon\)
:end:
> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2021 at 1:36 PM
> From: "Berry, Charles via General discussions about Org-mode."
>
> To: "michael-franz...@gmx.com"
> Cc: "Help Emacs Orgmode"
> Subject: Re: displaying equations with ob-latex
>
>
>
> >
Nick Dokos writes:
>> :body-only t
>> :html-postamble: t
>> :html-postamble-format : ""
>
> This last one seems wrong: the extra space before the colon should probably
> not be there.
> And I'm not sure whethe the colon after the last two properties should be
> there at all.
Maxim Nikulin writes:
> Though I still have not tested the patch, I think, it is an improvement
> and it is helpful in its current form. I am unable to tell if it follows
> code style.
FYI, this patch may also slightly improve the performance of
org-get-outline-path.
> My bad, you mentioned
> On May 6, 2021, at 4:20 PM, michael-franz...@gmx.com wrote:
>
> After I do "C-c C-c", I just get a message saying "Code block evaluation
> complete."
>
Are you doing this in a buffer that has ONLY the text between the `cut here'
lines and exactly that?
If not, please try it in such a
Bastien writes:
we are looking for more maintainers of individual Org Babel
files.
Hi,
I can volunteer to maintain ob-awk.el. I've signed my assignment
form with FSF, and returned it to them this evening. I'll let you
know when I'm official.
I have an account on code.orgmode.org
I haven't opened up the code yet to take a look, but I likely will take
a crack at some of these items in the future as low-hanging fruit
refactoring project.
On 5/6/21 6:05 PM, Boruch Baum wrote:
(org-w3m-get-image-end): New function, for w3m-img links.
3] As mentioned in the patch,
So I have a patch written that doesn't completely fix the problem, but
maybe makes enough progress that someone else can figure it out.
The issue is that comint-prompt-regexp is reading the "% " as a prompt,
and taking everyone off before it. I've added another parameter to
> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2021 at 10:52 AM
> From: "Berry, Charles via General discussions about Org-mode."
>
> To: "michael-franz...@gmx.com"
> Cc: "Help Emacs Orgmode"
> Subject: Re: displaying equations with ob-latex
>
>
>
> > On May 6, 2021, at 3:08 PM, michael-franz...@gmx.com wrote:
> >
After I do "C-c C-c", I just get a message saying "Code block evaluation
complete."
> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2021 at 10:52 AM
> From: "Berry, Charles"
> To: "michael-franz...@gmx.com"
> Cc: "Help Emacs Orgmode"
> Subject: Re: displaying equations with ob-latex
>
>
>
> > On May 6, 2021, at 3:08
> On May 6, 2021, at 3:08 PM, michael-franz...@gmx.com wrote:
>
> Did you manage to get the equations displayed, I have tried again and could
> not do
> it. It might be beneficial to give more details and some more examples on
> what to do.
>
Yes, the one equation was displayed as a
Did you manage to get the equations displayed, I have tried again and could not
do
it. It might be beneficial to give more details and some more examples on what
to do.
Can I export on a window that is to right window of the code window? I can one
use plain
tex commands. Texinfo mainly
On 2021-05-05 10:16, Bastien wrote:
> Thanks, it looks good.
>
> Can you try updating the patch against Org's upstream repository at
> https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/?
>
> Note that the file is lisp/ol-w3m.el there.
1] Attached.
2] Here's a commit message in the Changelog style:
Hello,
Timothy writes:
> I just thought there may be people who like me are interested in
> s for LaTeX in HTML, but not in Markdown.
Fair enough. Let's push your last patch, then.
Thank you.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
It would please many users if ob-latex was made to behave like other code
blocks.
One can parse and show equations in emacs using mathjax as has been recently
implemented in texinfo using @display.
Regards
Christopher
> Sent: Friday, May 07, 2021 at 6:14 AM
> From: "Berry, Charles via General
Hi,
auctex has a nice feature to hide certain elements, e.g. footnotes.
Would it be possible to include something similar in org-mode?
Best,
Denis
Giuseppe Lipari writes:
> (setq org-publish-project-alist
> '(("fil-web"
> :base-directory "./"
> :base-extension "org"
> :publishing-directory "./"
> :preparation-function update-all-dblocks-before-exporting
> :publishing-function org-html-publish-to-html
>
Hello,
there is an old problem with table alignment. It's mentioned here:
https://emacs.stackexchange.com/q/30495/11498
It occurs as far as I know only in 4 cases (last 4 rows):
| 2 latin
letters | ab | (2
glyphs)
Bastien writes:
> Jonas Bernoulli writes:
>
>> All the *ELPAs extract metadata from the "main library", which by
>> default is the library whose name matches the name of the package.
>>
>> If the name doesn't match, then it can be overridden, but some
>> main library is required, even if it
> On May 6, 2021, at 12:50 AM, michael-franz...@gmx.com wrote:
>
>
> I am trying to use ob-latex but equations are not being displayed in emacs
> when I try to execute with "C-c C-c".
Right. This is because `:results latex replace' is the default for latex src
blocks and the leads to
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 1:04 PM Alexander Adolf <
alexander.ad...@condition-alpha.com> wrote:
>
> Tim Visher writes:
>
> > [...]
> >
> > One of these days though I'm going to break the habit and move email
> > directly into Emacs. :)
>
> I was in the exact same situation as you until about half a
Though I still have not tested the patch, I think, it is an improvement
and it is helpful in its current form. I am unable to tell if it follows
code style.
Despite continuing discussion, I am unsure if it could be significantly
better.
On 06/05/2021 21:34, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Maxim
Am 05. Mai 2021 um 14:27 Uhr -0400 schrieb Bruce D'Arcus:
> Hope that explains.
Sure, thank you! I just wanted to provide some possibly useful input.
I am not to critise these exciting efforts.
-quintus
--
Dipl.-Jur. M. Gülker | https://mg.guelker.eu |For security:
Passau, Germany |
Hello Tim,
Tim Visher writes:
> [...]
> I do indeed trigger the capture by switching over to Emacs and whacking my
> org-capture keybinding (`C-c C`). I have a todo item that's been sitting in
> my list for a very long time to figure out how to move my email habits into
> emacs but I've never
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 12:20 PM Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
> > I'm getting out of my depth, as I no longer use LaTeX much, but WDYT
> > about using latexmk for export -> latex -> pdf, so that bibtex and
> > such is properly run?
>
> This is controlled by `org-latex-pdf-process'; modifying it is out
On 05/05/2021 01:55, Aleksandar Dimitrov wrote:
Yeah, I know the issue, which is why I rely on XCompose for Latin
scripts. For Cyrillic, alas, that is impossible. It means that I
basically can't control Emacs while using a Cyrillic layout, which is a
pity. I have no good workaround.
Generally,
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 12:05 PM Maxim Nikulin wrote:
> There is might be some uncertainty concerning handling of prefixes and
> suffixes. However my impression is that even e.g. \cite[p.~7]{key} is
> quite rare. For completeness, keys without prefixes, suffixes could be
> combined into single
"Bruce D'Arcus" writes:
> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 10:12 AM Nicolas Goaziou
> wrote:
>
>> You're missing the colon at the end of the keyword. Note that `org-lint'
>> warns you about it.
>
> Ugh; sorry about that.
>
> I'm getting out of my depth, as I no longer use LaTeX much, but WYDT
> about
On 06/05/2021 18:53, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
Your example should just use the default org-cite citation, without
any style or sub-style.
The rest would be handled by latex/bibtex.
Right?
Yes, simple \cite{k1,k2} is mostly enough for numeric citations. E.g
cases like separated list of
Hi Bastien,
Given the short length of the file, the fact that I now have a
fairly good idea of how it works, and the fact that I share a last
name with the original author of calc, I would be happy to. I'll hunt
down the steps you mentioned for becoming an ob- maintainer and ping
back when
Bastien, thank you for the fixes of electric-indent-mode, there is no
feeling that it is necessary to choose between broken and inconvenient
configuration options any more.
On 03/05/2021 15:06, Bastien wrote:
This might help: https://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#indentation
"What is the
Maxim Nikulin writes:
> I have not tested the patch due to I do not use agenda. My interest was
> stimulated solely by my attempts to make org-refile-get-targets faster.
Thanks for the feedback!
> I consider it as an improvement. I have noticed the only thing that must
> be fixed: comments
Hi Everyone,
Partly because I think it's neat and partly to ask for ways that I could
improve it I figured I'd share my latest little snippet of org elisp with
the list.
I maintain my primary TODO list as an org file with top-level headings like *
This Week, * Delegated, * Scheduled, * Deferred,
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 10:12 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> You're missing the colon at the end of the keyword. Note that `org-lint'
> warns you about it.
Ugh; sorry about that.
I'm getting out of my depth, as I no longer use LaTeX much, but WYDT
about using latexmk for export -> latex -> pdf, so
Bastien writes:
> Bastien writes:
>
>> Various discussions convinced me that `org-adapt-indentation' should
>> be nil by default.
>
> It is now, as of commit 0a651b746.
... and I broke some tests. Sorry for that. I will fix this next
week, unless someone does it before me.
--
Bastien
"Bruce D'Arcus" writes:
> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 8:05 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
>> Your document doesn't contain a "#+print_bibliography" keyword. It is
>> responsible for adding the "\\bibliography{...}" macro. I don't think it
>> is possible to produce a PDF without it.
>
> I paste my
Hi Bastien,
I'm interested in taking 'charge' of maintenance of 'orgmode.org/worg'.
My whole life revolves around org files. I use it extensively for
personal knowledge management, appointments, lessons, project management using
TaskJuggler, Python development using literate-programming, private
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 8:05 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Your document doesn't contain a "#+print_bibliography" keyword. It is
> responsible for adding the "\\bibliography{...}" macro. I don't think it
> is possible to produce a PDF without it.
I paste my input/output below.
Shouldn't the
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 8:29 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> "Bruce D'Arcus" writes:
>
> > The question comes down to whether to support sub-styles or not, and
> > if yes, what the syntax should be.
> >
> > I think it makes more sense to include them because otherwise you end
> > up with
I've got the same problem.
> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2021 at 9:54 PM
> From: michael-franz...@gmx.com
> To: "Help Emacs Orgmode"
> Subject: displaying equations with ob-latex
>
>
> I am trying to use ob-latex but equations are not being displayed in emacs
> when I try to execute with "C-c
Hi,
Fr Ml writes:
> I have a problem with the function org-store-link it doesn't work as
> described in the documentation:
> https://orgmode.org/manual/Handling-Links.html
> "For Org files, if there is a '<>' at point, the link points
> to
> the target."
Fixed in maint, thanks a lot for
Your other message, Nicolas, came in as I finished this, but I'll post
this anyway.
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 8:11 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> > I added the following to the wiki page, which I think addresses this:
> >
> > Note that `text/alt` would not make sense, as the sub-style in this case
>
I am unsure about this, but mathjax could be able to display
math format in emacs. Never tried this in emacs though, using
ob-latex. Had a go, but the display is not right.
> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2021 at 9:54 PM
> From: michael-franz...@gmx.com
> To: "Help Emacs Orgmode"
> Subject:
Hello,
"Bruce D'Arcus" writes:
> The question comes down to whether to support sub-styles or not, and
> if yes, what the syntax should be.
>
> I think it makes more sense to include them because otherwise you end
> up with an insanely long list of styles, which won't map well onto
> different
Hello,
"Bruce D'Arcus" writes:
> To come back to this
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2021, 10:53 AM Nicolas Goaziou
> wrote:
>
> Also it introduces ambiguities in style inheritance.
>> For example, if I add
>>
>> #+cite_export: natbib plainnat text
>>
>> would
>>
>> [cite//alt/caps:...]
>>
>>
"Nicholas Savage" writes:
> I can confirm this too on the latest master.
>
> I took a quick peek this morning, and my suspicion is that the problem is
> somewhere within org-babel-comint-with-output in lisp/ob-comint.el, but I'm
> not positive at this point.
I confirm as well. I also saw an
Hi Bastien,
On Thu, 06 May 2021 at 08:53, Bastien wrote:
I fixed this in the
maint branch, please let me know if you notice any weirdness.
It's looking good here now.
Thanks again.
Best,
Gustavo.
Hello,
"Bruce D'Arcus" writes:
> On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 2:08 PM Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>
>> I did some basic testing, and it seems to work well in general ...
>
> That was just looking at the citation output, of course.
>
> Now I did the real test: would LaTeX -> PDF work.
>
> Answer: not ATM.
>
Hello,
I have a problem with my publishing workflow. Here is the setting of my
variable org-publish-projet-alist in my init.org
(setq org-publish-project-alist
'(("fil-web"
:base-directory "./"
:base-extension "org"
:publishing-directory "./"
:preparation-function
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 7:37 AM Maxim Nikulin wrote:
> > For example, do you get that with the default \cite command in latex,
> > assuming the right bst file?
>
> Do you think something is wrong with such citations?
No.
I asked those questions because the focus now is on org-cite styles,
and
Hi Gustavo,
certainly a nitpick, but I think a good one. I fixed this in the
maint branch, please let me know if you notice any weirdness.
Thanks again,
--
Bastien
I can confirm this too on the latest master.
I took a quick peek this morning, and my suspicion is that the problem is
somewhere within org-babel-comint-with-output in lisp/ob-comint.el, but I'm not
positive at this point.
On Wed, May 5, 2021, at 22:35, John Corless wrote:
> Confirmed
>
>
Hi Sébastien,
Sébastien Miquel writes:
> Unless I misunderstand what you mean, the patch seems to follow this
> style.
Yes, sorry, my bad, I was reacting to another patch.
>> I think this should be applied to the maint branch, right? In this
>> case, the patch does not apply. Can you check
On 06/05/2021 00:16, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 12:59 PM Maxim Nikulin wrote:
On 04/05/2021 23:59, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Is the default \cite{key} command (without any other package) used? I'm
not sure we should provide it since we are working towards more complete
Hi Bastien,
Bastien writes:
Also, nitpick: please don't add a full-stop at the end of the first
line of the commit message (or the subject of your patch).
Unless I misunderstand what you mean, the patch seems to follow this
style.
I think this should be applied to the maint branch, right?
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 6:06 AM Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> If I add plainnat as style to the org file, I still get the undefined
> citation error.
So two things:
1. the bib file isn't include in the latex output
2. Denis noticed bibtex doesn't seem to run; maybe the pdf output
option for latex
Hi Sébastien,
Sébastien Miquel writes:
> The issue is that currently tangling a single block by calling
> `org-babel-tangle` with a prefix argument fails. This is unrelated to
> the earlier thread today, but was introduced by my original commit
> a2cb9b853d.
>
> Unfortunately, fixing it
Hi Tom,
Tom Gillespie writes:
> Here is a quick and dirty implementation that more or less does what
> you want (I think).
Mandatory question: would you like to be ob-calc.el maintainer?
--
Bastien
Hi Sébastien,
Sébastien Miquel writes:
> I apologise again for the troubles.
No problem. So we're all set here?
Also, nitpick: please don't add a full-stop at the end of the first
line of the commit message (or the subject of your patch).
Thanks,
--
Bastien
Hi Atlas,
Atlas Cove writes:
> Hello! I am finally making my first small contribution to org-mode!
Thank you!
Applied as commit bfc3d18b0 in the master branch.
https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html#commit-messages will tell
you more on how to prepare a proper commit message for future
Hi Aleksandar,
Aleksandar Dimitrov writes:
> [...]
> I must admit that I find the inline org-src notation (of which I
> didn't know yet) somewhat jarring, and certainly less pleasant to
> read. Perhaps we could use a similar mechanism to
> =org-hide-emphasis-markers= to make it more pleasant to
Not sure, but is this what you are looking for?
https://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org4beginners.html#orgc1dbe4b
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 5:42 AM Denis Maier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> in order to test the new org-cite features I've tried installing orgmode
> from the git repo.
>
> So, in my home
I am trying to use ob-latex but equations are not being displayed in emacs
when I try to execute with "C-c C-c".
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 3:36 AM Denis Maier
wrote:
> Bruce has sent me his test files, and it turned out to be the bibstyle
> (humannat), which apparently isn't included in current tex distributions.
> Question: I can't see why this style should be used according to the
> minimal example Bruce
I am trying to use ob-latex but equations are not being displayed in emacs
when I try to execute with "C-c C-c".
Hi,
in order to test the new org-cite features I've tried installing orgmode
from the git repo.
So, in my home folder
git clone https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode.git
cd org-mode
make
Then, I get this message ...
==
= Invoke "make help"
Jean Louis writes:
> If those files have copyrights submitted, should they not end up in
> GNU ELPA?
Many of the authors for files in org-contrib did not want to assign
their copyright to the FSF.
That's one of the reasons behind the contrib/ directory in the first
place.
Also, org-contrib
* Bastien [2021-05-03 18:14]:
> Hi all,
>
> Less code is less bug and less maintainance. So I'm considering
> moving these files to the new (unmaintained) org-contrib repo at
> https://git.sr.ht/~bzg/org-contrib:
>
> - ob-abc.el --- Org Babel Functions for ABC
> - ob-asymptote.el --- Babel
To come back to this
On Wed, May 5, 2021, 10:53 AM Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
Also it introduces ambiguities in style inheritance.
> For example, if I add
>
> #+cite_export: natbib plainnat text
>
> would
>
> [cite//alt/caps:...]
>
> mean
>
> [cite/text/alt/caps:...] (i.e.,
Am 05.05.2021 um 20:14 schrieb M. ‘quintus’ Gülker:
Am 05. Mai 2021 um 09:46 Uhr -0400 schrieb Bruce D'Arcus:
We found three rules:
1. what Chicago calls "American"
2. what it calls "British"
3. French (though Denis is still confirming how these work in actual books)
The output in each, when
Am 05.05.2021 um 23:25 schrieb Bruce D'Arcus:
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 2:08 PM Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
I did some basic testing, and it seems to work well in general ...
That was just looking at the citation output, of course.
Now I did the real test: would LaTeX -> PDF work.
Answer: not ATM.
On Wednesday, 5 May 2021 at 13:16, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 12:59 PM Maxim Nikulin wrote:
>> In some fields simple "[3,7]" citations are traditional.
>
> How do you achieve such output, with which formats, packages, commands?
>
> For example, do you get that with the default
82 matches
Mail list logo
