Re: [O] How to do proper folding and semantic markup

Hi Nick. [...] >> Excuse me if this sounds almost philosophical, but in which situation an >> indirect buffer may be better that just focusing on the same (original) >> buffer? For example, when you are toying with potentially big >> modifications and don't want to replace the original? Is it

Re: [O] How to do proper folding and semantic markup

Hi Adam. Porter writes: >> Excuse me if this sounds almost philosophical, but in which situation an >> indirect buffer may be better that just focusing on the same (original) >> buffer? [...] > [...] > So by jumping to an entry in an indirect buffer, I see only that entry,

Re: [O] How to do proper folding and semantic markup

Eduardo Mercovich mercovich.net> writes: > Excuse me if this sounds almost philosophical, but in which situation an > indirect buffer may be better that just focusing on the same (original) > buffer? For example, when you are toying with potentially big > modifications and don't want to replace

Re: [O] How to do proper folding and semantic markup

Eduardo Mercovich writes: > Hi Adam. > >>> Also less known that it deserves, for focusing I do use narrowing a >>> lot: [...] > >> Yeah, that's basically what tree-to-indirect does, it makes an indirect >> buffer and then narrows it. So you can widen the indirect buffer

Re: [O] How to do proper folding and semantic markup

Hi Adam. >> Also less known that it deserves, for focusing I do use narrowing a >> lot: [...] > Yeah, that's basically what tree-to-indirect does, it makes an indirect > buffer and then narrows it. So you can widen the indirect buffer and get > another view of the whole buffer. [...] Excuse me

Re: [O] How to do proper folding and semantic markup

Eduardo Mercovich mercovich.net> writes: > Also less known that it deserves, for focusing I do use narrowing a lot: Yeah, that's basically what tree-to-indirect does, it makes an indirect buffer and then narrows it. So you can widen the indirect buffer and get another view of the whole buffer.

Re: [O] How to do proper folding and semantic markup

Hi Adam. > Just a note, you mentioned that you find the folding very useful, so you > might want to try out the org-tree-to-indirect-buffer command. It's very > helpful when you're working on a large Org file and only want to work on > certain parts of it. [...] I didn't knew it, thank you. :)

Re: [O] How to do proper folding and semantic markup

Hi Eduardo, Just a note, you mentioned that you find the folding very useful, so you might want to try out the org-tree-to-indirect-buffer command. It's very helpful when you're working on a large Org file and only want to work on certain parts of it. I don't see it mentioned often, so I'm not

Re: [O] How to do proper folding and semantic markup

Hi Eric. >> This linking capacity is great and I'm using it a lot. >> The only detail remaining here that I'm still searching is how to >> include the table/figure # also with the link. This is because if >> someone prints the report, the link becomes unusable without a number. > Well, if you

Re: [O] How to do proper folding and semantic markup

On Thursday, 31 Mar 2016 at 21:39, Eduardo Mercovich wrote: [...] > This linking capacity is great and I'm using it a lot. > > The only detail remaining here that I'm still searching is how to > include the table/figure # also with the link. This is because if > someone prints the report, the

Re: [O] How to do proper folding and semantic markup

Hi Christian. >> ... place the abstract and #+LATEX: commands for frontmatter before the >> first exported headline, e.g., >> #+BEGIN_abstract >> [Abstract here] >> #+END_abstract > Originally my fault for pointing out that this was possible (for latex > and html backends, anyway) without any

Re: [O] How to do proper folding and semantic markup

Aloha Tom. >> I'm using org-mode as a writer and it is simply fantastic. One of the >> things I enjoy more is the folding. [...] >> However, I don't know how to integrate that with some semantic markup >> and the latex exporter at the same time (BTW, org+latex=awesomness!). >> I'll use the

Re: [O] How to do proper folding and semantic markup

Eduardo Mercovich writes: > > ... place the abstract and #+LATEX: commands for frontmatter before the > first exported headline, e.g., > #+BEGIN_abstract > [Abstract here] > #+END_abstract Originally my fault for pointing out that this was possible (for latex and html backends, anyway) without

Re: [O] How to do proper folding and semantic markup

Aloha Eduardo, You might find Aaron Ecay's ox-extra.el in contrib useful. It defines an :ignore: tag that instructs the exporter to ignore the headline it tags, but still export the text, etc. under the headline. So, , | * Abstract :ignore: |

[O] How to do proper folding and semantic markup

Dear all. I'm using org-mode as a writer and it is simply fantastic. One of the things I enjoy more is the folding. A huge report like the one I'm working on seems sooo easy... ;) However, I don't know how to integrate that with some semantic markup and the latex exporter at the same time (BTW,