Leo Alekseyev dnqu...@gmail.com writes:
I am afraid this might have caused a regression (although it could've
been something else). With the latest org-mode pull, C-x C-s in
org-src buffer does not save the underlying org-file (as expected) but
instead prompts for file name to save. This is
Andreas Leha andreas.l...@med.uni-goettingen.de writes:
Leo Alekseyev dnqu...@gmail.com writes:
I am afraid this might have caused a regression (although it could've
been something else). With the latest org-mode pull, C-x C-s in
org-src buffer does not save the underlying org-file (as
I am afraid this might have caused a regression (although it could've
been something else). With the latest org-mode pull, C-x C-s in
org-src buffer does not save the underlying org-file (as expected) but
instead prompts for file name to save. This is rather bad behavior.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012
Hi Leo,
Leo Alekseyev dnqu...@gmail.com writes:
Folks, I still think that the fact that buffer-file-name is not nil is
a bug and should be fixed.
So do I. I think this is fixed now -- thanks!
--
Bastien
You still have to C-c ' to get back to the full buffer, mind you, but
that's better, IMO, than changing the behaviour of such a fundamental
key binding as C-x C-s.
It appears that this bug is Emacs-version dependent: it functions as
you describe with 23.2, but the buffer gets buried (with
Leo Alekseyev dnqu...@gmail.com writes:
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
What version of org are you using? I ask because I used to experience
the annoyance you describe a while back; more recently (since at least a
few months ago), hitting C-x C-s no longer has any negative impact:
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
Leo Alekseyev dnqu...@gmail.com writes:
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
What version of org are you using? I ask because I used to experience
the annoyance you describe a while back; more recently (since at least a
few months ago), hitting
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Andreas Leha
andreas.l...@med.uni-goettingen.de wrote:
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
Leo Alekseyev dnqu...@gmail.com writes:
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
What version of org are you using? I ask because I used to experience
the
Leo Alekseyev dnqu...@gmail.com writes:
I often edit my org-babel code blocks via org-edit-special (C-'), in
part because I find the tabbing behavior within the code blocks to be
somewhat flaky. Inevitably, when editing the code block I will press
C-x C-s (muscle memory). This causes all
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
Leo Alekseyev dnqu...@gmail.com writes:
I often edit my org-babel code blocks via org-edit-special (C-'), in
part because I find the tabbing behavior within the code blocks to be
somewhat flaky. Inevitably, when editing the code block I will press
C-x
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
What version of org are you using? I ask because I used to experience
the annoyance you describe a while back; more recently (since at least a
few months ago), hitting C-x C-s no longer has any negative impact: it
saves the file, or at least appears
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Leo Alekseyev dnqu...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
What version of org are you using? I ask because I used to experience
the annoyance you describe a while back; more recently (since at least a
few months ago), hitting C-x C-s no
I often edit my org-babel code blocks via org-edit-special (C-'), in
part because I find the tabbing behavior within the code blocks to be
somewhat flaky. Inevitably, when editing the code block I will press
C-x C-s (muscle memory). This causes all sorts of annoying
consequences: the buffer with
13 matches
Mail list logo
