These custom commands are not analogous to sectioning commands. In
fact most of them are environments. So I decided that orgmode could
not achieve what I wanted to do (at least currently) and continued to
use LaTeX. Too bad, I really like orgmode syntax.
--
Truong Nghiem
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012
I had a similar issue with typesetting in theorem and proof
environments; what saved me from messy LaTeX syntax was
org-special-blocks. More info is on Worg:
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/org-special-blocks.html
This is not *exactly* your situation, since this is using org syntax
within
Hi Truong,
Truong Nghiem truong.ngh...@gmail.com writes:
Is there any way to turn on orgmode markups inside LaTeX fragments for
export? For example, when I write
\mycommand{*Bold text*}
in an org file and export it to LaTeX, I would like to have
\mycommand{\textbf{Bold text}}
Hi Bastien,
My use-case is that I need to write a document that needs to be output
to various styles (all using LaTeX). Each style may use a different
class and set of packages. And each defines a different set of
commands, with different syntax, to format the contents (they are not
standard
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 16:55, Truong Nghiem truong.ngh...@gmail.com wrote:
If there is any solution or workaround for my problem, please let me know.
If these custom commands are analogs of commands like section and
such, you can always define your own LaTeX_CLASS. The manual has
information on
Is there any way to turn on orgmode markups inside LaTeX fragments for
export? For example, when I write
\mycommand{*Bold text*}
in an org file and export it to LaTeX, I would like to have
\mycommand{\textbf{Bold text}}
Currently it is exported as-is (verbatim):
\mycommand{*Bold
