Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML

2012-04-10 Thread Bastien
Hi François, pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes: I added Du as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is it a limitation (or a bug)? I would call it a limitation. -- Bastien

Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML

2012-04-10 Thread François Pinard
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: Hi François, Bonjour, Bastien! I added Du as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is it a limitation (or a bug)? I would call it a limitation. Could it be documented somewhere

Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML

2012-04-10 Thread Bastien
Bonjour François, pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes: Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: Hi François, Bonjour, Bastien! I added Du as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is it a limitation (or a

[O] Problem with dates while generating HTML

2012-03-05 Thread François Pinard
Given the following header contents: --8---cut here---start-8--- * Problème date - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][2012-02-29]] - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][Du 2012-02-29]] --8---cut here---end---8--- here is how it is

Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML

2012-03-05 Thread Nick Dokos
François Pinard pin...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote: Given the following header contents: * Problème date - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][2012-02-29]] - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][Du 2012-02-29]] here is how it is shown in the Web browser after publishing: I added Du as a prefix