Hi François,
pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes:
I added Du as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is
it a limitation (or a bug)?
I would call it a limitation.
--
Bastien
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
Hi François,
Bonjour, Bastien!
I added Du as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is
it a limitation (or a bug)?
I would call it a limitation.
Could it be documented somewhere
Bonjour François,
pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes:
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes:
Hi François,
Bonjour, Bastien!
I added Du as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is
it a limitation (or a
Given the following header contents:
--8---cut here---start-8---
* Problème date
- [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][2012-02-29]]
- [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][Du 2012-02-29]]
--8---cut here---end---8---
here is how it is
François Pinard pin...@iro.umontreal.ca wrote:
Given the following header contents:
* Problème date
- [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][2012-02-29]]
- [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][Du 2012-02-29]]
here is how it is shown in the Web browser after publishing:
I added Du as a prefix