Hello,
Samuel Wales writes:
> On 11/21/18, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> You can use a zero-width space, like +++.
>
> that trick does not work on ===.
What does not work, exactly?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
On 11/21/18, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> You can use a zero-width space, like +++.
that trick does not work on ===.
Hello,
John Kitchin writes:
> hm. I would have interpreted it as an empty string with a strikethrough,
> followed by a plus. It makes sense to require 1 or more characters
> between them though.
>
> Why is +-+ not a - with a strikethrough? Because it is a table line?
It was a bug I was not
hm. I would have interpreted it as an empty string with a strikethrough,
followed by a plus. It makes sense to require 1 or more characters
between them though.
Why is +-+ not a - with a strikethrough? Because it is a table line? Or
+ + is not a space with a strikethrough. I guess there are word
Hello,
John Kitchin writes:
> That doesn't seem right to me. It seems like a bug that it is rendered as
> strikethrough to me, like the regexp that is generated is too greedy. That
> was a good hint though.
IMO, +++ is clearly a plus sign with strike-through. Why would "+" sign
be excluded
Hello,
John Kitchin writes:
> That doesn't seem right to me. It seems like a bug that it is rendered as
> strikethrough to me, like the regexp that is generated is too greedy. That
> was a good hint though.
IMO, +++ is clearly a plus sign with strike-through. Why would "+" sign
be excluded
Hello,
John Kitchin writes:
> That doesn't seem right to me. It seems like a bug that it is rendered as
> strikethrough to me, like the regexp that is generated is too greedy. That
> was a good hint though.
IMO, +++ is clearly a plus sign with strike-through. Why would "+" sign
be excluded
That doesn't seem right to me. It seems like a bug that it is rendered as
strikethrough to me, like the regexp that is generated is too greedy. That
was a good hint though.
I was able to add + to the border component of the regexp components which
seems to have fixed the problem for me for now.
> On Nov 19, 2018, at 6:08 PM, John Kitchin wrote:
>
> I was looking at https://github.com/joostkremers/criticmarkup-emacs again
> recently and ran into something I don't recall happening before.
>
> There is a markup for inserting text thatlooks like {++Insert this text++}.
> However, in
I was looking at https://github.com/joostkremers/criticmarkup-emacs again
recently and ran into something I don't recall happening before.
There is a markup for inserting text thatlooks like {++Insert this text++}.
However, in org-mode this is marked up as strikethrough. Is there a way to
make
10 matches
Mail list logo
