Hi Dan,
Dan Davison wrote:
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
management issue: I find it difficult (a) to remember what all my source
code snippets are called and (b) to navigate to any given snippet. I
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
[...]
management issue: I find it difficult (a) to remember what all my source
code snippets are called and (b) to navigate to any given snippet. I
would love to see
You are correct, while the tangling works, the detangling still needs to
be updated to take into account the fact that there may now be nested
sections of tangled code -- which it doesn't currently. Hopefully this
wont be too large of a code change...
It probably wouldnt involve much code
Dan Davison dandavis...@gmail.com writes:
[...]
If you know the name of the code block you want to find you can use
`org-babel-goto-named-src-block' (bound to C-c C-v g) to jump to a named
code block (∃ a similar function for finding named results).
Would anyone object if I change that
Your cursor must be on a code line, not on a special comments line. I've
had
the same behavior once. Just move down your cursor one or two lines away...
Are you saying you have succesfully detangled noweb embedded code? If so,
ill have to take a look at the code to see where the bug is. It
Please try using a decent sender, or at least no HTML. I know this cannot
be
obvious, though, but look at the results:
Not to get off on a tanget, but im using gmail. Looks perfect in my gmail
account - i guess your email doesnt support html markup? I just reply to
all, and it
ok, so im not sure how you got it working, but heres the problem in
the code (i think).
We start with the tangled output
--
;; [[file:~/Desktop/test.org][/home/seth/Desktop/test\.org:2]]
(let ((x 1))
(message x=%s x)
;;
Hi Seth,
Seth Burleigh wbur...@gmail.com writes:
Not to get off on a tanget, but im using gmail. Looks perfect in my
gmail account - i guess your email doesnt support html markup? I just
reply to all, and it automatically does the markup. I guess ill have
to learn how to disable it:)
Easy
Hi Seth,
You are correct, while the tangling works, the detangling still needs to
be updated to take into account the fact that there may now be nested
sections of tangled code -- which it doesn't currently. Hopefully this
wont be too large of a code change...
Seth Burleigh wbur...@gmail.com
Hi Eric,
Eric Schulte wrote:
I've just pushed up a new header argument combination :comments noweb
which will wrap all embedded noweb sections in link comments, as
demonstrated in the following example. Hopefully this should be
sufficient for a complete mapping from a pure code file back to
Sébastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes:
Hi Eric,
Eric Schulte wrote:
I've just pushed up a new header argument combination :comments noweb
which will wrap all embedded noweb sections in link comments, as
demonstrated in the following example. Hopefully this should be
Hi Eric,
Eric Schulte wrote:
Sébastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes:
Eric Schulte wrote:
I've just pushed up a new header argument combination :comments noweb
which will wrap all embedded noweb sections in link comments, as
demonstrated in the following example. Hopefully this
Hi Seth,
Seth Burleigh wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Eric Schulte span
dir=ltrmailto:schulte.e...@gmail.com/span wrote:
Please try using a decent sender, or at least no HTML. I know this cannot be
obvious, though, but look at the results:
#+source: wrappablebr
#+begin_src
Seth Burleigh wbur...@gmail.com writes:
My bad. I believe i did look up the functions, but they didn't do what i
needed (or so i thought).
The code doesn't matter too much, let me explain the idea.
A file may contain many blocks of code. Lets look at a arbitrary block A. In
the end, block A
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Seth,
Thanks for the thoughtful comments. I especially like the method of
literate programming described in your second proposal. Over the last
months I have switched from working mainly in code blocks to working
mainly in pure source files
Štěpán Němec step...@gmail.com writes:
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Seth,
Thanks for the thoughtful comments. I especially like the method of
literate programming described in your second proposal. Over the last
months I have switched from working mainly in code blocks
As an update, ive been working on something i call chunks.
Basically, they are blocks of code (i.e. emacs overlays) that are linked
together.
So far, i have each ns of my clojure code in one source block which is
then tangled to one file.
So, i would like to open the tangled file and then make
Hi Seth,
I looked briefly at your code and much of it re-implements functionality
already provided by org-mode using a slight variation of Org-mode
syntax. While I fully understand that it is often easier to write your
own functions rather than look up and parse existing functions, I think
that
My bad. I believe i did look up the functions, but they didn't do what i
needed (or so i thought).
The code doesn't matter too much, let me explain the idea.
A file may contain many blocks of code. Lets look at a arbitrary block A. In
the end, block A will somehow become noweb embedded into a
and i misspoke also, the previous .org file wouldnt work since that uses
noweb. Heres a simple new example.
test.org
Description: Binary data
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
20 matches
Mail list logo
