On 27 Aug 2009, at 06:47, Charles Philip Chan wrote:
Carsten Dominik domi...@uva.nl writes:
[snip]
5. The cursor keys left and right are remapped to a
function that does nothing, except showing a message
that you should now use f/b to move through time.
Looks good, but like others
On Aug 27, 2009, at 3:05 AM, Samuel Wales wrote:
Looks good. However, you might want to have cursor movement work, if
the keys will not be functional, so that people can mark text (nobody
mentioned that yet). Did you get a chance to look at my proposal for
right and left arrow keys?
Yes, I
On Aug 26, 2009, at 8:22 AM, Bastien wrote:
Carsten Dominik domi...@uva.nl writes:
1. n/p remain as they where
2. Moving forward/backward though time will be `f' and `b'
3. Follow mode goes to the F key, a capital letter does
make sense here given that some other modes like [G]rid
and
Hi,
thank you everybody for this very interesting discussion. I have
been trying to think of a way to extract common ground from the
different opinions.
Here is what I have come up with:
1. n/p remain as they where
2. Moving forward/backward though time will be `f' and `b'
3. Follow mode goes
Carsten Dominik domi...@uva.nl writes:
1. n/p remain as they where
2. Moving forward/backward though time will be `f' and `b'
3. Follow mode goes to the F key, a capital letter does
make sense here given that some other modes like [G]rid
and clock[R]eport and [D]iary are on capitals as
Looks good. However, you might want to have cursor movement work, if
the keys will not be functional, so that people can mark text (nobody
mentioned that yet). Did you get a chance to look at my proposal for
right and left arrow keys?
--
Myalgic encephalomyelitis causes death (Jason et al.
Carsten Dominik domi...@uva.nl writes:
Hi,
thank you everybody for this very interesting discussion. I have
been trying to think of a way to extract common ground from the
different opinions.
Here is what I have come up with:
1. n/p remain as they where
2. Moving forward/backward
Carsten Dominik domi...@uva.nl writes:
1. n/p remain as they where
2. Moving forward/backward though time will be `f' and `b'
3. Follow mode goes to the F key, a capital letter does
make sense here given that some other modes like [G]rid
and clock[R]eport and [D]iary are on capitals as
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
we have the proposal to do the following key changes in the agenda:
1. Make the cursor keys LEFT and RIGHT do normal cursor motion again
2. Use the keys n and p to switch the agenda to earlier
and later dates.
But n and p are
On 2009-08-25 10:12 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hi,
we have the proposal to do the following key changes in the agenda:
1. Make the cursor keys LEFT and RIGHT do normal cursor motion again
2. Use the keys n and p to switch the agenda to earlier
and later dates.
I like n and p to move
Benjamin Andresen bandre...@gmail.com writes:
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
we have the proposal to do the following key changes in the agenda:
1. Make the cursor keys LEFT and RIGHT do normal cursor motion again
2. Use the keys n and p to switch the agenda to
Hey Bastien,
Bastien bastiengue...@googlemail.com writes:
Benjamin Andresen bandre...@gmail.com writes:
But n and p are already used to move up and down entries in the
org-agenda.
Where would they go to then?
C-n and C-p, like in any Emacs buffer?
Sure. That's a given. But they seem to be
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 11:12:16 +0200
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Make the cursor keys LEFT and RIGHT do normal cursor motion again
2. Use the keys n and p to switch the agenda to earlier
and later dates.
I would like to call a vote on this issue. Please weigh in.
Hi everyone,
I tend to agree with the arguments that n and p should move
vertically in the agenda buffer, because many Emacs modes do
it like this.
So it seem to me that this discussion should focus on which keys should
move the agenda forward and backward in time.
- Carsten
On Aug 25, 2009,
On 2009-08-25 11:59 +0100, Leo wrote:
I like n and p to move up and down like in many other modes for
example ibuffer, dired, Gnus etc. Changing this to be incompatible
with other modes alienates orgmode. So I'd vote to keep current
behaviour.
I would like to call a vote on this issue.
Another solution would be to use f and b to move forward and
backward in time. Some other Agenda bindings would have to change to
accommodate this. Old f (org-agenda-follow-mode) could become F
which is unused. But b and B are both used and would need to be
remapped.
Obviously this is not the
On Aug 25, 2009, at 2:20 PM, Chris Leyon wrote:
Another solution would be to use f and b to move forward and
backward in time. Some other Agenda bindings would have to change to
accommodate this. Old f (org-agenda-follow-mode) could become F
which is unused. But b and B are both used and
all use 'n' for next line and 'p' for previous line.
I think the modes that use 'n' for next line and 'p' for next/previous
line tend to be 'single page' modes (e.g., dired). I personally
rarely use n/p even in those: C-n/C-p are automatic in my fingers and
they always work so that I do not
Carsten Dominik wrote:
we have the proposal to do the following key changes in the agenda:
1. Make the cursor keys LEFT and RIGHT do normal cursor motion again
I'd be fine with this change, though I can't remember when I last used
the left/right keys for cursor motion in emacs. :)
2. Use
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
I tend to agree with the arguments that n and p should move
vertically in the agenda buffer, because many Emacs modes do
it like this.
So it seem to me that this discussion should focus on which keys should
move the agenda forward and
Chris Leyon cle...@gmail.com writes:
Another solution would be to use f and b to move forward and
backward in time. Some other Agenda bindings would have to change to
accommodate this. Old f (org-agenda-follow-mode) could become F
which is unused. But b and B are both used and would need
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
we have the proposal to do the following key changes in the agenda:
1. Make the cursor keys LEFT and RIGHT do normal cursor motion again
No. Why would you want to do cursor motion in the agenda?
2. Use the keys n and p to switch the agenda
Hi all,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
I tend to agree with the arguments that n and p should move vertically
in the agenda buffer, because many Emacs modes do it like this.
So it seem to me that this discussion should focus on which keys should move
the agenda forward and backward in time.
From my
Carsten Dominik schrieb:
Hi,
we have the proposal to do the following key changes in the agenda:
1. Make the cursor keys LEFT and RIGHT do normal cursor motion again
2. Use the keys n and p to switch the agenda to earlier
and later dates.
I would like to call a vote on this issue.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Christian Egli wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
we have the proposal to do the following key changes in the agenda:
1. Make the cursor keys LEFT and RIGHT do normal cursor motion again
No. Why would you want to do cursor motion in the agenda?
One could make
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:31, Manishmailtomanish.sha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Christian Egli wrote:
No. Why would you want to do cursor motion in the agenda?
One could make part of a heading a link to, say, an email, and may want to
visit that.
Clockreport also
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
we have the proposal to do the following key changes in the agenda:
1. Make the cursor keys LEFT and RIGHT do normal cursor motion again
2. Use the keys n and p to switch the agenda to earlier
and later dates.
I would like to call a vote
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes:
1. Make the cursor keys LEFT and RIGHT do normal cursor motion again
2. Use the keys n and p to switch the agenda to earlier
and later dates.
No and no for the same reasons Christian Egli mentioned.
Memnon
On Aug 25, 2009, at 5:31 PM, Manish wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Christian Egli wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
we have the proposal to do the following key changes in the agenda:
1. Make the cursor keys LEFT and RIGHT do normal cursor motion again
No. Why would you want to do
29 matches
Mail list logo
