Luis Osa writes:
> I would like to tangle source code blocks that contain coderefs. I have
> found that the coderefs are correctly filtered out from the tangled files
> if they follow the default format, i.e. "(ref:%s)", but not if I try to
> customize the format using the documented "-l" switch
Tom Gillespie writes:
>I don't think you are doing anything wrong. IIRC the portion of the
> patch that allowed the customization to propagate to the tangled code
> was not included. Given that I am no longer the only one who is
> looking for/expecting this behavior, maybe it is worth
Hi Tom,
The simplest fix right now would be to prepend your coderef
> with the python comment symbols # |hello| so that at the very least it
> won't break your tangled files.
Actually, that is exactly what I have done as a quick fix. It has a minor
inconvenience: anything else included on the
Hi Luis,
I don't think you are doing anything wrong. IIRC the portion of the
patch that allowed the customization to propagate to the tangled code
was not included. Given that I am no longer the only one who is
looking for/expecting this behavior, maybe it is worth revisiting the
decision. The
Dear all,
I would like to tangle source code blocks that contain coderefs. I have
found that the coderefs are correctly filtered out from the tangled files
if they follow the default format, i.e. "(ref:%s)", but not if I try to
customize the format using the documented "-l" switch [1] to change
