Sébastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes:
Hi, Seb
The manual is written in texinfo.
BTW, what's the reason for that? [...]
Are there good reasons
not to move it to Org format?
Carsten wrote ;-) :
Org-mode is currently not able to produce TeXInfo,
which is the standard for
Sébastien Vauban wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes:
Hi,
Dan Davison wrote:
Please see the manual as an example.
Hmm? The manual is written in texinfo.
BTW, what's the reason for that? Does it still apply? Are there good reasons
not to move it to Org format?
Best regards,
Seb
It
Jeff Horn jrhorn...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote:
I believe these pages have not been exported since we turned off the
inline css publishing option; i.e., they have not been touched since
that time, so the publishing mechanism does not
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote:
So the new, flat FAQ is up and running. And, of course, all are
welcome to suggest or contribute further refinements.
Blue (or purple or similar color) text on black background is unreadable -
at least to my
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org writes:
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote:
So the new, flat FAQ is up and running. And, of course, all are
welcome to suggest or contribute further refinements.
Blue (or purple or similar color) text on black
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com wrote:
For managing alternate stylesheets I use the style chooser extension
for Chrome which adds a dropdown menu to the url-bar whenever a page
provides alternate style sheets and has the nice feature of remembering
your
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Dan Davison dandavis...@gmail.com wrote:
I strongly second this. In fact I'll stick my neck out more: Worg is
great, but for tutorials on org-mode, HTML export is often the wrong
format for obvious reasons (i.e. unless you go to some trouble, it
conceals a lot
Jeff Horn wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Dan Davison dandavis...@gmail.com wrote:
I strongly second this. In fact I'll stick my neck out more: Worg is
great, but for tutorials on org-mode, HTML export is often the wrong
format for obvious reasons (i.e. unless you go to some trouble,
Erik Iverson er...@ccbr.umn.edu writes:
Jeff Horn wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Dan Davison dandavis...@gmail.com wrote:
I strongly second this. In fact I'll stick my neck out more: Worg is
great, but for tutorials on org-mode, HTML export is often the wrong
format for obvious
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Jeff Horn jrhorn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Dan Davison dandavis...@gmail.com wrote:
I strongly second this. In fact I'll stick my neck out more: Worg is
great, but for tutorials on org-mode, HTML export is often the wrong
format
Jeff Horn jrhorn...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Dan Davison dandavis...@gmail.com wrote:
I strongly second this. In fact I'll stick my neck out more: Worg is
great, but for tutorials on org-mode, HTML export is often the wrong
format for obvious reasons (i.e. unless you
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Dan Davison dandavis...@gmail.com wrote:
All of which could be solved with some effort. My point is: what does
the HTML export of this document really offer over the verbatim
htmlized one?
I'll concede. I seem to have spoken out of turn, since I haven't
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Dan Davison dandavis...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Jeff Horn jrhorn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Dan Davison dandavis...@gmail.com wrote:
I strongly second this. In fact I'll stick my neck out more: Worg is
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Dan Davison dandavis...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Dan Davison dandavis...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Jeff Horn jrhorn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Dan Davison dandavis...@gmail.com wrote:
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote:
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote:
So the new, flat FAQ is up and running. And, of course, all are
welcome to suggest or contribute further refinements.
Blue (or purple or similar color) text on
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote:
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote:
So the new, flat FAQ is up and running. And, of course, all are
welcome to suggest or contribute
I see this issue a lot on the Babel pages. What needs to be done is
wrap each source/example block in another block with org as the
language.
For example:
#+begin_src org
,#+begin_src sh :results output
ls -al
,#+end_src
#+end_src
I think this should be done for all Babel
Jeff Horn jrhorn...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote:
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote:
So the new, flat FAQ is up and running. And, of course, all
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Jeff Horn jrhorn...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote:
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Matt Lundin
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org writes:
On this one page, I think we need a simple (non-js) table-of-contents.
Is there a way to override the hidden toc for this page only?
Yes, by either adding a stylesheet that undoes the hiding or by not
including the
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org writes:
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com writes:
I made a version of the FAQ without the javascript folding:
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/org-faq-nojs.html
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/org-faq.html
It like it better, but it's still a bit unwieldy.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Jason Dunsmore
emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com wrote:
I think this might be unnecessary (hitting Back, typing the Home
key, or middle clicking at the top of the scroll bar can all already do
this).
I'm not an expert, but that is not very accessible. Shouldn't be a
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
I just pushed up an edit to the Worg repository which should reset all
of the defaults on the TOC of the org-faq-nojs.org page. If this works
I vote we set this as the sole org-faq page.
It works, but I think
Jeff Horn jrhorn...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Jason Dunsmore
emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com wrote:
I think this might be unnecessary (hitting Back, typing the Home
key, or middle clicking at the top of the scroll bar can all already do
this).
I'm not an expert, but
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
I just pushed up an edit to the Worg repository which should reset all
of the defaults on the TOC of the org-faq-nojs.org page. If this works
I vote we set this as
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com writes:
Looks like the TOC links are larger than the text on the rest of the
page. Can the text size be made the same?
That's what the inherit is fixing. You may still have the old copy in
cache, I've just now
...@imapmail.org; emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Carsten Dominik
carsten.domi...@gmail.com; Jason Dunsmore ja...@dunsmor.com
Sent: Tue, January 18, 2011 10:46:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Re: Worg needs some reorganizing
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Bastien bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr wrote:
Jeff Horn
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Jason Dunsmore
emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com wrote:
Does anybody know why some pages have inline CSS? For example:
The publishing projects for the affected pages may not have the the
:style-default key set to nil. The relevant variable is
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Jason Dunsmore
emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com wrote:
Jeff Horn jrhorn...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Jason Dunsmore
emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com wrote:
I think this might be unnecessary (hitting Back, typing the Home
key, or middle clicking at
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote:
So the new, flat FAQ is up and running. And, of course, all are
welcome to suggest or contribute further refinements.
Blue (or purple or similar color) text on black background is unreadable -
at least to my eyes.
Thanks,
Nick
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote:
I believe these pages have not been exported since we turned off the
inline css publishing option; i.e., they have not been touched since
that time, so the publishing mechanism does not export them.
Matt,
I was going to
Jeff Horn jrhorn...@gmail.com writes:
Jason seems to be garnering a lot of votes, but Eric's zenburn
emulation makes my eyes happy. If Jason wins out, I suppose I could
always just read Worg in emacs... :D
Or use Eric zenburn-like css by selecting it as an alternative
stylesheet in Firefox :
Thanks all for the work on worg.css -- I'm excited to see this happen!
I'm putting Sebastian explicitely into the loop: I remember Sebastian
worked on org.css (and maybe worg.css?) to make sure the spacing between
HTML headings was okay for folding/unfolding through org-info-js. Maybe
this is
Bastien bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr writes:
Jeff Horn jrhorn...@gmail.com writes:
Jason seems to be garnering a lot of votes, but Eric's zenburn
emulation makes my eyes happy. If Jason wins out, I suppose I could
always just read Worg in emacs... :D
Or use Eric zenburn-like css by
Bastien bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr writes:
Jeff Horn jrhorn...@gmail.com writes:
Jason seems to be garnering a lot of votes, but Eric's zenburn
emulation makes my eyes happy. If Jason wins out, I suppose I could
always just read Worg in emacs... :D
Or use Eric zenburn-like css by
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org writes:
Bastien bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr writes:
Jeff Horn jrhorn...@gmail.com writes:
Jason seems to be garnering a lot of votes, but Eric's zenburn
emulation makes my eyes happy. If Jason wins out, I suppose I could
always just read Worg in emacs... :D
Bastien bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr writes:
Thanks all for the work on worg.css -- I'm excited to see this happen!
I'm putting Sebastian explicitely into the loop: I remember Sebastian
worked on org.css (and maybe worg.css?) to make sure the spacing between
HTML headings was okay for
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com wrote:
...
That's okay with me. I just uploaded the latest stylesheet with Eric's
collapsed TOC integrated in:
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg.css
You can see it in action at:
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/
I haven't been able to see Eric's TOC in
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com wrote:
...
That's okay with me. I just uploaded the latest stylesheet with Eric's
collapsed TOC integrated in:
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg.css
You can see it in action at:
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
I'm partial to the emacs.css bundled with my
submission over the current code fontification, but that's just me.
I put your pre style in place:
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg.css
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com wrote:
The front page doesn't have a TOC. You can see it here:
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/org-dependencies.html
OK - I can see it on this page.
Thanks,
Nick
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use
One last change I would suggest, is that rather than use inline css for
the highlighted source code, we use a css stylesheet by setting the
(setq org-export-htmlize-output-type 'css)
Then use a single .css style sheet as done with the @import(emacs.css)
in my previous submission. I'm
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org writes:
Bastien bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr writes:
Jeff Horn jrhorn...@gmail.com writes:
Jason seems to be garnering a lot of votes, but Eric's zenburn
emulation makes my eyes happy. If Jason wins out, I suppose I could
always just read Worg in emacs... :D
By the way, having the javascript section-folding enabled on only some
pages is confusing and doesn't make for the best browsing experience.
Now that the TOC will be collapsed by default, perhaps it's no longer
needed?
Yes the javascript is probably the culprit here, I agree that with the
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Bastien bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr wrote:
Jeff Horn jrhorn...@gmail.com writes:
Jason seems to be garnering a lot of votes, but Eric's zenburn
emulation makes my eyes happy. If Jason wins out, I suppose I could
always just read Worg in emacs... :D
Or use
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
By the way, having the javascript section-folding enabled on only some
pages is confusing and doesn't make for the best browsing experience.
Now that the TOC will be collapsed by default, perhaps it's no longer
needed?
Yes the javascript is
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a consensus on removing Javascript folding from *all* pages on
Worg. I think this would be an improvement both for the readability and
stylistic coherence of the site.
+1 from me. Also, is the custom worg
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org writes:
Bastien bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr writes:
Jeff Horn jrhorn...@gmail.com writes:
Jason seems to be garnering a lot of votes, but Eric's zenburn
emulation makes my eyes happy. If Jason wins out, I suppose I
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
One last change I would suggest, is that rather than use inline css for
the highlighted source code, we use a css stylesheet by setting the
(setq org-export-htmlize-output-type 'css)
Then use a single .css style sheet as done with the
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Jason Dunsmore
emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com wrote:
I get the error Symbol's function definition is void: publish-htmlize.
I made sure to (require 'htmlize).
I believe the function `org-publish-org-to-org` calls htmlize. Make
sure to (require 'org-publish).
--
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com writes:
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
By the way, having the javascript section-folding enabled on only some
pages is confusing and doesn't make for the best browsing experience.
Now that the TOC will be collapsed by default, perhaps
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org writes:
My suggestion would be to go with Jason's css (combined with Eric's
expandable table of contents) then have Eric's css and the old-worg
css available as alternative css.
I like Jason's stylesheet, and have a couple of observations:
1) h3 headers are
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com writes:
While we're fixing things, are there any objections to making the
publishing change recommended above? It should significantly reduce the
size of pages which contain a large amount of source code, and will make
it easier to adjust the
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com writes:
I made a version of the FAQ without the javascript folding:
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/org-faq-nojs.html
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/org-faq.html
Thanks. Nitpicking: I'd prefer paragraphs to be indented to the right
(so that headines are
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com writes:
I added the following to org-publish-project-alist:
(worg-htmlize
:base-directory ~/git/Worg/
:base-extension org
:html-extension org.html
:publishing-directory /var/www/orgmode.org/worg/
Bastien bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr writes:
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com writes:
I made a version of the FAQ without the javascript folding:
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/org-faq-nojs.html
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/org-faq.html
Thanks. Nitpicking: I'd prefer paragraphs to be
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com wrote:
I don't have a strong opinion about this: splitting the FAQ into
org-faq-*.org comes to my mind, but it's a big task. org-info-js,
while not optimal for *every* page on Worg, was doing a good job
on the FAQ.
Sometimes I come across one
I don't have a strong opinion about this: splitting the FAQ into
org-faq-*.org comes to my mind, but it's a big task. org-info-js,
while not optimal for *every* page on Worg, was doing a good job
on the FAQ.
I'd lean towards keep the FAQ as one large flat html file to encourage
text
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org writes:
Bastien bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr writes:
Jeff Horn jrhorn...@gmail.com writes:
Jason seems to be garnering a lot of votes, but Eric's zenburn
emulation makes my eyes happy. If Jason wins out, I suppose I could
always just read Worg in emacs... :D
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com writes:
Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org writes:
Bastien bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr writes:
Jeff Horn jrhorn...@gmail.com writes:
Jason seems to be garnering a lot of votes, but Eric's zenburn
emulation makes my eyes happy. If Jason wins out, I
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com writes:
The new stylesheet is in place now.
Great, thanks all for this effort!
Jason, correct me if I'm wrong, I think you copied worg.css directly on
the server. So I put it in the Worg.git repo and then publised Worg
again.
So changes to worg.css
I changed the background of code chunks to black - please revert this
if you find it too agressive/unreadable. I really dislike the fake
white we had as the background for black-on-white code chunks...
I just replaced the black with a slightly softer dark-gray, please feel
free to revert.
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com writes:
I made a version of the FAQ without the javascript folding:
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/org-faq-nojs.html
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/org-faq.html
It like it better, but it's still a bit unwieldy. Maybe the FAQ just
needs to be reorganized.
Bastien bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr writes:
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com writes:
I added the following to org-publish-project-alist:
(worg-htmlize
:base-directory ~/git/Worg/
:base-extension org
:html-extension org.html
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com writes:
There's a Firefox add-on that will give you configurable per-site user
CSS:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/stylish/
I installed this but AFAIK it doesn't help managing alternative
stylesheets as defined by the headers of the
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have a strong opinion about this: splitting the FAQ into
org-faq-*.org comes to my mind, but it's a big task. org-info-js,
while not optimal for *every* page on Worg, was doing a good job
on the FAQ.
I'd
I updated your first one and added your second one. I also updated mine
to use your idea for the Org mascot.
So we have three options:
Option 1: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-jason/
Option 2: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric/
Option 3: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric2/
I think they're all a
Jason Dunsmore ja...@dunsmor.com writes:
I updated your first one and added your second one. I also updated mine
to use your idea for the Org mascot.
So we have three options:
Option 1: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-jason/
Option 2: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric/
Option 3:
Bastien bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr writes:
Jason Dunsmore ja...@dunsmor.com writes:
I updated your first one and added your second one. I also updated mine
to use your idea for the Org mascot.
So we have three options:
Option 1: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-jason/
Option 2:
Jason the design is superb.
On 2011-01-16, Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com wrote:
I'm not a web-designer, but here's my stab at re-designing Worg:
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/
--
The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
I support WPI:
I like Jason's -- with a non-white bg (text should still be black).
Seems to work with large fonts.
--
The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
I support WPI: http://www.wpinstitute.org/xmrv/index.html -- PLEASE DONATE
===
I want to see the original (pre-hold) Lo et al. 2010
My suggestion would be to go with Jason's css (combined with Eric's
expandable table of contents) then have Eric's css and the old-worg
css available as alternative css.
Sounds good, I like the idea of combining the two styles. I don't know
how alternate css stylesheets work, but I would
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Bastien bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr writes:
Wow! I love this. My preference goes to Jason's version: both plain
simple and colorful.
Please do not use fixed measures in pixels, points, inches or
centimeters and prescribed font families. Let this
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Bastien bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr writes:
Wow! I love this. My preference goes to Jason's version: both plain
simple and colorful.
Please do not use fixed measures in pixels, points, inches or
centimeters and prescribed font families. Let this
Hi Jason,
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com writes:
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
I recall a discussion of holding a competition to select a new css style
for Worg (found it here [1]). I think that such a change could
fruitfully be combined with the Worg
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com writes:
I made several unit changes from px to em, removed the line-height
property, and removed Georgia as the default font:
Well actually, relative font sizing works would be 'larger' and
'smaller', which would
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com writes:
I've taken all of your advice to heart and created this improved CSS
file:
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-improved.css
:) Joking aside, please send me a patch or CSS file with your
suggestions implemented.
Bastien bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr writes:
Jason Dunsmore ja...@dunsmor.com writes:
Option 1: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-jason/
Option 2: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric/
Option 3: http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric2/
Wow! I love this. My preference goes to Jason's version: both plain
An aside: I noticed that both stylesheets contain a lot of instructions
that seem to have been created by htmlize.el:
That is certainly true of the sheets I submitted, although all of the
htmlize generated css is contained in the separate emacs.css and
zenburn-emacs.css sheets imported by
Jason seems to be garnering a lot of votes, but Eric's zenburn
emulation makes my eyes happy. If Jason wins out, I suppose I could
always just read Worg in emacs... :D
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Matt Lundin m...@imapmail.org wrote:
Bastien bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr writes:
Jason
I recall a discussion of holding a competition to select a new css style
for Worg (found it here [1]). I think that such a change could
fruitfully be combined with the Worg re-organization.
Looking forward to these changes -- Eric
Alan E. Davis lngn...@gmail.com writes:
I would like to add a
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
I recall a discussion of holding a competition to select a new css style
for Worg (found it here [1]). I think that such a change could
fruitfully be combined with the Worg re-organization.
I'm not a web-designer, but here's my stab at re-designing
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com writes:
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
I recall a discussion of holding a competition to select a new css style
for Worg (found it here [1]). I think that such a change could
fruitfully be combined with the Worg re-organization.
I'm
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
Jason Dunsmore emacs-orgm...@dunsmor.com writes:
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
I recall a discussion of holding a competition to select a new css style
for Worg (found it here [1]). I think that such a change could
fruitfully be
and option #2:
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric/
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric.css
Thanks for putting this up, I see a problem in the current stylesheet,
could you please apply the attached alternate version?
Thanks -- Eric
body {
background-image:
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
and option #2:
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric/
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg-eric.css
Thanks for putting this up, I see a problem in the current stylesheet,
could you please apply the attached alternate version?
Okay, I uploaded the new
I would like to add a comment about the sidebar concept. If I understand
correctly, there is something like a sidebar already, or an index. There
are links, but they jump to the SAME PAGE. It would be helpful, at least
to me, were these links to point to the pages already pointed to at their
87 matches
Mail list logo
