On 08/11/2010 01:14 AM, Samuel Wales wrote:
i suggest begin-end pairs, not putting text in the syntax itself.
though you could, if you want, using quotes.
$[class begin :title animals]Some text about animals$[class end
:title animals]
Why not allow both? If I want to highlight one or
Hi,
- this would be extensible, e.g.
[background[yellow] highlighted text]
could export to the following html
span style=background:yellow;highlighted text/span
- this would avoid {}s
- this would look more org-like than the pure latex solution
the only issue with the above is
Hi,
Can we please first read Samuels post about extensible syntax? Before
we invent 20 other new syntaxes?
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/10204/focus=10204
Thanks!
On Aug 10, 2010, at 8:14 AM, Christian Moe wrote:
Hi,
- this would be extensible, e.g.
Hi Christian,
Christian Moe m...@christianmoe.com writes:
Hi,
I'm sorry my point was buried in quoted text. I did read Samuel's
post. But my question was whether we couldn't *avoid inventing new
syntaxes*, by using the already existing link syntax with custom links
and export handlers
Hi, Eric,
Thanks for trying this out -- I should have taken the trouble to write
out sample code myself.
Just for completeness I'm adding an example of a color handler which can
be added to a users config to enable colorization of exported text to
html and latex.
--8---cut
Christian Moe wrote:
Hi, Eric,
Thanks for trying this out -- I should have taken the trouble to write
out sample code myself.
Just for completeness I'm adding an example of a color handler which can
be added to a users config to enable colorization of exported text to
html and latex.
I wrote (against my own suggestion):
A drawback with using links for markup is that the user sees things that
look like links, but do nothing when clicked, except give error messages.
David Maus wrote:
It's not just a drawback but a more fundamental problem: This solution
abolishes the
i suggest begin-end pairs, not putting text in the syntax itself.
though you could, if you want, using quotes.
$[class begin :title animals]Some text about animals$[class end
:title animals]
i wrote the following long ago, but never sent it to
the list. it is not polished at all -- needs more
Christian Moe m...@christianmoe.com writes:
[...]
Admittedly, though, all the currently defined link types mean do
something when clicked, which a =color:red= link does not.
well this may be trivial, but at least it's an action
--8---cut here---start-8---
Hi,
The attached patch implements in-buffer coloring and html export using
the syntax proposed below.
While I think this is an improvement over my previous patch, this idea
still has some shortcoming including the fact that
- nested color specifications aren't working for export (and could be
Hi Eric,
Did you read my proposals in detail?
Samuel
On 2010-08-08, Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch implements in-buffer coloring and html export using
the syntax proposed below.
While I think this is an improvement over my previous patch, this idea
On Aug 8, 2010, at 11:00 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
Vinh Nguyen vinhdi...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Eric Schulte
schulte.e...@gmail.com wrote:
In playing with the patched code I sent out, I noticed that it may
be
doing weird things to my headings (#+Title: etc...) in
Am 09.08.2010, 08:28 Uhr, schrieb Carsten Dominik
carsten.domi...@gmail.com:
Nope, I am against this syntax. If we introduce a more general syntax,
then it should be done in the way Samuel proposed. WHich means
we firs get a keyword indtroducing the piece, and then properties.
Like
Am 09.08.2010, 09:37 Uhr, schrieb Robert Klein rokl...@roklein.de:
Sorry dropped something on the keyboard and sent the message early :(
Am 09.08.2010, 08:28 Uhr, schrieb Carsten Dominik
carsten.domi...@gmail.com:
Nope, I am against this syntax. If we introduce a more general syntax,
then it
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com wrote:
In playing with the patched code I sent out, I noticed that it may be
doing weird things to my headings (#+Title: etc...) in some Org-mode
files, so probably it could use some more tweaking before any merge,
also I'd
Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
I've recently seen similar requests on this list.
The attached patch provides a first pass at this support implementing
both in-buffer coloring given the following syntax, and html export (I
don't know the correct LaTeX syntax, but it
Hi all,
I do, very strongly, propose extensible syntax. Thanks for bringing it up, Dan.
I have much more on this but cannot type now.
Samuel
--
Q: How many CDC scientists does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: You only think it's dark. [CDC has denied a deadly disease for 25 years]
Vinh Nguyen vinhdi...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Eric Schulte schulte.e...@gmail.com wrote:
In playing with the patched code I sent out, I noticed that it may be
doing weird things to my headings (#+Title: etc...) in some Org-mode
files, so probably it could use some
Hi Vinh,
Vinh Nguyen vinhdi...@gmail.com writes:
I was wondering if there is an easy way to markup the color of the
text for html output (and highlight as well). When I prepare meeting
minutes I'd like to color some things and highlight certain things.
Right now, I am using emphasizing a
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:18 AM, Bastien bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr wrote:
Hi Vinh,
Vinh Nguyen vinhdi...@gmail.com writes:
I was wondering if there is an easy way to markup the color of the
text for html output (and highlight as well). When I prepare meeting
minutes I'd like to color some
Hi,
I've recently seen similar requests on this list.
The attached patch provides a first pass at this support implementing
both in-buffer coloring given the following syntax, and html export (I
don't know the correct LaTeX syntax, but it shouldn't be hard to extend
this to LaTeX as well). This
Thanks Eric, this works. I do agree that the implemented syntax is
not org-like but more latex-like. To be more org-like, could we use
parentheses or curly braces like how links are implemented? They
aren't taken, are they? For example,
((red)(this text is red))
{{yellow}{this text is
Hi Vinh,
Vinh Nguyen vinhdi...@gmail.com writes:
Thanks Eric, this works.
Great,
I do agree that the implemented syntax is not org-like but more
latex-like. To be more org-like, could we use parentheses or curly
braces like how links are implemented? They aren't taken, are they?
For
23 matches
Mail list logo
