i still use maint as a comparison against bugfix and main to make sure
they didn't intro regressions. i even tested 8 for a long time so i
could go back and check formatting changes etc. if maint gets it
right tht might be a clue is all.
On 7/1/23, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Samuel Wales
Samuel Wales writes:
> - bugfix and main sorting still not getting ts-down tsia-down right.
> maint gets it right.
maint is obsolete and no longer used.
> - having said that it was a relief to have had this script for so many
> years as i was able to be confident that the agenda was picking up
On 01/07/2023 10:03, Samuel Wales wrote:
- running non-batch works but is annoying with emacs popping up for
each test and loading .emacs for a few seconds
For running tests that creates windows it may be convenient to use
xephyr that is a X server running as a window in the current X
correction for anybody who bothered to follow all that nonsense: the
bizarre bug with not including certain entries only exists in bugfix.
i had gotten it to exhibit itself in 2 repos with different names at
one point but never mind that.
On 6/19/23, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Samuel Wales writes:
>
>> the bug occurs in recent bugfix, but not recent main, so perhaps we
>> could say that it is fixed in main but that the fix has not been
>> applied to bugfix? [if only the fix were known.]
>
> Maybe.
>
>> does org testing use --batch?
i don't do anything with visibility. make test seems ok in bugfix.
but perhaps it does not generate a comprehensive agenda, in which case
maybe --batch would cause the bug.
what i am going to try to do is just remove --batch and lower the
frame and try to get bugfix to work like main. this is
Samuel Wales writes:
> the bug occurs in recent bugfix, but not recent main, so perhaps we
> could say that it is fixed in main but that the fix has not been
> applied to bugfix? [if only the fix were known.]
Maybe.
> does org testing use --batch?
Yup.
If you have time and interest, it would
wondering if it is possible to enable display stuff without actually
dispaying anything.
On 6/18/23, Samuel Wales wrote:
> the bug occurs in recent bugfix, but not recent main, so perhaps we
> could say that it is fixed in main but that the fix has not been
> applied to bugfix? [if only the fix
the bug occurs in recent bugfix, but not recent main, so perhaps we
could say that it is fixed in main but that the fix has not been
applied to bugfix? [if only the fix were known.]
does org testing use --batch?
bugfix tests ok. but idk if that tests agenda.
On 6/18/23, Ihor Radchenko
Samuel Wales writes:
> can you think of any differences between bugfix and main
> that could result in
>
> 1) bugfix not producing certain agenda entries from the org
>outline (THE BUG)
> 2) with no obvious differences between the entries that show
>and the entries that do not
> 3) FROM
can you think of any differences between bugfix and main
that could result in
1) bugfix not producing certain agenda entries from the org
outline (THE BUG)
2) with no obvious differences between the entries that show
and the entries that do not
3) FROM A BATCH CALL. removing --batch from
11 matches
Mail list logo
