Re: [O] agenda: past due deadlines *also* showing up under today's date

Hello, Sébastien Delafond writes: > On 2017-03-05, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> I don't think so. Maybe we need to implement an equivalent to >> `org-scheduled-past-days' for deadlines. > > That'd be awesome :) Done in master as `org-deadline-past-days'.

Re: [O] how to export to HTML using old-style numbered div ID's?

Hello, Nick Dokos writes: > Peter Salazar writes: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I figured out that the problem I've been having with >> org-html-slideshow >> (https://github.com/relevance/org-html-slideshow) is that it relies >> on the old-style numbered

Re: [O] ascii section references for id links can be inline?

Hello, Samuel Wales writes: > can ascii output for id links be inline? > > === org source > Some recent test results are > [[id:aa8795c5-7ee7-48e2-84f7-49d26f371632][here]]. > === > > === current output > Some recent test results are [here]. > > [here] See section 6.2.2.2

Re: [O] limitation for macro expansion

Hi Nicolas, Thank you for your time. I really appreciate it. On Tue, 07 Mar 2017 01:41:34 +0900, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Yasushi SHOJI writes: > > > I assume that the key phrase is "anywhere Org markup is recognized". > > Link format doesn't allow Org markup, right?

Re: [O] how to export to HTML using old-style numbered div ID's?

Peter Salazar writes: > Hi everyone, > > I figured out that the problem I've been having with > org-html-slideshow > (https://github.com/relevance/org-html-slideshow) is that it relies > on the old-style numbered anchors that org-mode used to generate for > div ID's in

[O] how to export to HTML using old-style numbered div ID's?

Hi everyone, I figured out that the problem I've been having with org-html-slideshow ( https://github.com/relevance/org-html-slideshow) is that it relies on the old-style numbered anchors that org-mode used to generate for div ID's in HTML export—the ones that looked like "sec-1-2". Example:

[O] ascii section references for id links can be inline?

can ascii output for id links be inline? === org source Some recent test results are [[id:aa8795c5-7ee7-48e2-84f7-49d26f371632][here]]. === === current output Some recent test results are [here]. [here] See section 6.2.2.2 === === possible new output Some recent test results are in section

Re: [O] %( in capture template

On 2/19/17, Samuel Wales wrote: > * x >link > https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/rfjkj7op114w/?=15a580ccf5cb9d34=c >description Gmail - %( in capture template >region > %(alpha-org-protocol-string >

[O] Exams

Does anybody have a good system for writing exams with Org mode ? Thanks, M signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [O] "wrong=type-argument listp" on publish

Matt Price writes: > Anyone else getting this? I'm unable to publish.  I don't see what is > unlist-like about the first > argument to plist-put.  > -- > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument listp (:base-directory > "~/RLG231/Lectures/" >

Re: [O] Clock setup stopped working after update

So, I did some more digging into this. First, I installed an older version of org: M-x org -version: Org-mode version 8.2.10 (8.2.10-41-g42228a-elpa @ c:/Users/mheller/AppData/Roaming/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20150601/) With this, the clocking-related issues went away. I know this version is probably

[O] "wrong=type-argument listp" on publish

Anyone else getting this? I'm unable to publish. I don't see what is unlist-like about the first argument to plist-put. -- Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument listp (:base-directory "~/RLG231/Lectures/" :base-extension "org" :publishing-directory

Re: [O] [PATCH] Add function evaluation parameter for the clocktable scope

Hello, Eduardo Bellani writes: > org-clock.el: Add nullary function evaluation as a clocktable scope > parameter Applied with some tiny changes: I remove "nullary function" from the manual, preferring "function of no argument". I updated the test to reflect latest changes

Re: [O] limitation for macro expansion

Yasushi SHOJI writes: > I assume that the key phrase is "anywhere Org markup is recognized". > Link format doesn't allow Org markup, right? Not in the first part indeed. You can, however, use a macro in the description part of the link. > # I use

[O] HTML presentations using org-html-slideshow?

Hi everyone, I've been using the excellent org-html-slideshow ( https://github.com/relevance/org-html-slideshow) to generate HTML slides from org-mode, and it's been working well for me for years. It generates HTML slides from org-mode using the org-mode heading hierarchy. Tag any heading with

Re: [O] limitation for macro expansion

Hi Nicolas, On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Yasushi SHOJI writes: > there are two ways to interpret it: the one you expect and > > a_{CONTENTS} where CONTENTS is {{something}}. > > Since subscript syntax started first,

Re: [O] limitation for macro expansion

Hello, Yasushi SHOJI writes: > Ah, you mean the parser is unable to distinguish the macro and > subscript? It's not the parser, but the syntax. Subscript is a_{...} whereas macro is {{{macro(...)}}} so, when you see a_{{{something}}} there are two ways to