Hi all,
The patch below allow's you to provide your own shell command the
generates HTML from a latex fragment and places the output directly in
the exported HTML file.
I've added this feature to be able to use latexml for processing latex
fragments to HTML. Unfortunately, mathjax can't process m
> On Feb 16, 2020, at 2:55, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
>
>
> On 2020-02-14, at 21:48, Bastien wrote:
>
>> We have a good reference documentation for creating export backends:
>> https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-export-reference.html
>>
>> But we *badly* need a step by step tutorial on Worg.
>
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> In a nutshell:
>
> `org-link-parameters' accepts a new property, :open, which is
> like :follow, but function installed there is called with a universal
> prefix argument. It could replace :follow altogether, but for
> compatibility reasons, they both live side by side f
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:48:02 +0100
Bastien wrote:
> We have a good reference documentation for creating export backends:
> https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-export-reference.html
>
> But we *badly* need a step by step tutorial on Worg.
>
> Anyone would like to volunteer for writing such a tutori
Hello,
Bastien writes:
>>> Now, I'm not sure who wants to try implementing Nicolas suggestion to
>>> let ox.el expand attachments into file links: since you both know the
>>> issue better than I do, I suggest one of you can try?
>>
>> I will try to propose a patch by tomorrow evening.
>
> Thanks
On 2020-02-14, at 21:48, Bastien wrote:
> We have a good reference documentation for creating export backends:
> https://orgmode.org/worg/dev/org-export-reference.html
>
> But we *badly* need a step by step tutorial on Worg.
>
> Anyone would like to volunteer for writing such a tutorial?
I mig
Hello,
Bastien writes:
> I see org-export-options-alist is not mentioned in the manual - would
> it be worth mentioning it in the "Adding Export Back-ends" section?
I don't think so. It is a constant, which may only matter when you write
an export-backend. Its value is not even particularly imp
Hello,
Jens Lechtenboerger writes:
> the W3C Markup Validator [1] disagrees with this output from
> ox-html (which I reduced to the essential parts):
OK. I was talking about the Org syntax. I misread your initial report.
I won't comment about the generated HTML. If needed, the HTML exporter
ca