Hi,
have in some source file, let's assume Python, the following:
foo = {
"bar": (
"baz",
"qux",
),
}
What is the best way to put this into an
#+BEGIN_SRC python
foo = {
"bar": (
"baz",
"qux",
),
}
#+END_SRC
Thanks,
Andreas
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Christian,
>
> I must be doing something really silly (not unheard of ;-) but I just
> cannot get the new tj3 exporter to work. With an up to date org (as of
> a few minutes ago), using the example from the tutorial but also an
> example from
* contrib/lisp/ox-taskjuggler.el: Extend variable `complete' to respect clock
times if no other information is given.
There are three possibilities for setting a task's progress when exporting to
TJ3:
1) If TODO state equals "done" => 100%
2) If property "complete" is explicitly given => use t
Rick Frankel writes:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 08:26:52PM -0700, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>> Rick Frankel writes:
>>
>> > Whoops. Wrong key. Patch actually attached to this email...
>> > rick
>>
>> Great, I'll consolidate all these -- would it be better to mush them
>> into one big patch, or to
Samuel Wales writes:
> Has there been a recent change in HTML centering? We get this now:
>
>
>
> This does not work in browsers that do not support CSS.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Samuel
Looks like Bastien put that in in baa2999, around March 12. That commit
moved the remaining inline style declaratio
hi. i've two suggestions/requests/queries about using hline-relative
references, e.g., @III, in formulas in org-mode spreadsheets.
1. i would like to use this syntax on the *left* hand side of a
formula. e.g.,
#+TBLFM: @I$2=vsum(@-I$1..@+I$1)
(meaning, the second column in the first r
Christian,
I must be doing something really silly (not unheard of ;-) but I just
cannot get the new tj3 exporter to work. With an up to date org (as of
a few minutes ago), using the example from the tutorial but also an
example from Baptiste from last week, I get the following error message
when
Carsten Dominik writes:
[...]
> Hi Eric,
>
> I can see that this must be painful, so you are one of the
> people who suffer from this more that others. On the other
> hand, this also makes you an asset for Org-mode, because
> you keep testing the exporter in many different ways.
>
> I hope that
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 1:51 PM, John Hendy wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Bastien wrote:
>> Hi Jisang,
>>
>> Jisang Yoo writes:
>>
>>> 2. Place cursor at the beginning of "** bacon" and press M-RET and org
>>> creates
>>> a first-level heading.
>>
>> This should now be fixed. Thanks
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Jisang,
>
> Jisang Yoo writes:
>
>> 2. Place cursor at the beginning of "** bacon" and press M-RET and org
>> creates
>> a first-level heading.
>
> This should now be fixed. Thanks for reporting this,
There were some same/similar/related iss
Hello,
I'm writing an exam in org mode, and it's going really well. I need to
have some code in code blocks being run during export (as it's defining
some functions for later questions), but I don't want anything to be
displayed in the final document. At the moment I use the following
options in t
Nice! Short and sweet, and works great. It should go on
orgmode.orgsomewhere in the cool hacks section.
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Rick Frankel wrote:
> On 01.05.2013 18:41, Leo Alekseyev wrote:
>
>> Howdy Org-folks,
>>
>> Something that I've found myself wishing for time and time again
Hello,
It is not currently possible to asynchronously export the results of the
evaluation an ocaml babel block because the evaluation needs to start a toplevel
and thus asks the user what program to run. This of course blocks the
asynchronous export.
The attached patch adds a custom variable to
Igor Sosa Mayor writes:
> Thanks Nicolas. At least, I dont feel alone anymore... Is there any
> chance this getting fixed somehow? I used to use it very often in my
> emails and I miss it.
I miss it, too.
I didn't follow recent changes to orgstruct-mode, so I cannot help here.
I hope that someo
On 01.05.2013 18:41, Leo Alekseyev wrote:
Howdy Org-folks,
Something that I've found myself wishing for time and time again is
to
be able to follow the link to a file and immediately pop into a set
of
M-x occur results given some search term for that file. That way I
could link to an overvie
Masataro Asai writes:
> org latex classes can be considererd as a template. template is somewhat
> similer to lambda. you wouldnt want any function to be modified by another
> function which recieved it as its argument.
Of course, `org-latex-classes' is a template. But it doesn't apply on
table
Correcting myself:
> Sorry for being dense, but why do you use _path_, which is a string and,
> as you say, requires `equal' for equality, instead of the first argument
> of the function, i.e. _link_, which only needs `eq'?
Forget it. Caching LINK will only be useful when resolving the very same
Hello,
Lawrence Mitchell writes:
> * ox.el (org-export-resolve-fuzzy-link): Look for fuzzy link in a
> cache before trying to resolve it in the parse tree.
>
> When a document contains a large number of identical fuzzy links, it
> doesn't make sense to continually search for them. Instead, ca
Apologies if this has been asked already. I just noticed that, e.g., the
ox-beamer.html page [1] has no links to its parent nodes. So for fun, I
hacked the url to go back up a couple of levels, and that page didn't have
any parent links either.
It would be very useful to have the standard breadcru
On May 2, 2013 4:20 PM, "Nicolas Goaziou" wrote:
> James Harkins writes:
>
> > That would assume that you can customize the string org uses for
> > *bold*, which you can't at present... so maybe my hack has some use
> > after all.
>
> This has already been discussed, and there's a solution provid
Nicolas,
sorry for my offending remarks in the second message. i was just a little
nervous about that unexpected behavior for me.
org latex classes can be considererd as a template. template is somewhat
similer to lambda. you wouldnt want any function to be modified by another
function which reci
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 11:41:49AM -1000, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
> John Hendy writes:
>
> > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Marcin Borkowski
> > wrote:
>
> 3) So, markup should be semantic, rather than visual.
>
> It is possible to achieve identical results using visual markup, of
> course, bu
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 02:48:41AM +, James Harkins wrote:
> ... implemented my own hack to customize the LaTeX
> command for beamer to use for *bold text* (pasted as a git patch
> below).
[...chomp...chomp...chomp...]
> From 8ccbc7cad43b520067b8b29d4660fc99587995fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
On ma 29-apr-2013 10:50
Marcel van der Boom wrote:
>
> When using org-archive-subtree, any statistic counters present in the
> header will be copied to
> the :ARCHIVE_OLPATH: property.
>
Can anyone else reproduce this? Do I need to provide more information?
Thx,
marcel
--
Marcel van der Boom
Dnia 2013-05-02, o godz. 02:48:41
James Harkins napisał(a):
> John Hendy gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Just wondering about the rationale behind using *bold* markup for
> > \textbf{} in LaTeX export and to \alert{} in Beamer. Was this a
> > frequently voiced request? I'm sure I can dig into this som
Hello,
I'm resurrecting this old thread as I've made some progress but I
still have questions.
Eric Schulte writes:
>> The suggestion: instead of appending '"org-babel-ocaml-eoe";;' to the
>> code, how simply put ';;' (which will make sure everything is flushed)
>> then detect the toplevel is do
* ox.el (org-export-resolve-fuzzy-link): Look for fuzzy link in a
cache before trying to resolve it in the parse tree.
When a document contains a large number of identical fuzzy links, it
doesn't make sense to continually search for them. Instead, cache the
locations in the position independent
Am Thu, May 02, 2013 at 10:33:42AM +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> No, I can confirm this.
Thanks Nicolas. At least, I dont feel alone anymore... Is there any
chance this getting fixed somehow? I used to use it very often in my
emails and I miss it.
--
:: Igor Sosa Mayor :: joseleopoldo1...
Hello,
Igor Sosa Mayor writes:
> I don't want to be annoying... but am I really alone with this
> problem?
No, I can confirm this.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
I don't want to be annoying... but am I really alone with this problem?
Am Wed, May 01, 2013 at 05:03:51PM +0200, Igor Sosa Mayor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Orgstruct minor mode is working with the mail-mode a little strange.
>
> If I write a simple list where every item is smaller than a line, I can
> us
Hello,
Aaron Ecay writes:
> (Nicolas, I’m waiting to see if you have any thoughts before pushing
> this patch to the org repo.)
That's good. Please push it into maint branch.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Hello,
Masataro Asai writes:
> Reply to myself:
>
> I edebugged the ox-latex and studied what's happening.
> Who wrote this code?
Obviously, not you.
> you shouldn't do things like this... The code is overwriting the
> defcustom'ed sectioning format, no one knows.
Doing what? Would you mind g
Hello,
James Harkins writes:
> That would assume that you can customize the string org uses for
> *bold*, which you can't at present... so maybe my hack has some use
> after all.
This has already been discussed, and there's a solution provided at:
http://orgmode.org/worg/exporters/beamer/ox-
Sebastien,
> Put a partial echo code block (one where you select in the var header
> argument which columns interest you), and output the results of that
> code block?
thanks! below is the final result of your suggestion. (my table was
long, so i had to use longtable; i also used a "landscape
Aaron Ecay writes:
> Try the patch attached to this email. It simply avoids
> inserting the alternate heading whenever it is identical to the
> standard
> one.
Sounds good to me. Aesthetically, the insertion of \section[·]{·} has
bothered me. . .
–Rasmus
--
⠠⠵
Rick Frankel writes:
> On 01.05.2013 13:28, Daimrod wrote:
>> Thanks for the report, I've attached a patch that fixes this problem
>> (in
>> both `org-display-inline-images' and `org-preview-latex-fragment').
>> However I don't know if it is the right approach or if I should try
>> to
>> narrow t
On 1.5.2013, at 14:28, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> "Thomas S. Dye" writes:
>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> I haven't been following closely, so I'm just checking that you're aware
>> of a new variable org-export-allow-bind-keywords, which could play a
>> role in the behavior you are seeing.
>
> Thanks Tom. I
37 matches
Mail list logo
