Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML

2012-04-10 Thread Bastien
Bonjour François,

pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes:

> Bastien  writes:
>
>> Hi François,
>
> Bonjour, Bastien!
>
>>> I added "Du " as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
>>> directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description.  Is there a way, or is
>>> it a limitation (or a bug)?
>
>> I would call it a limitation.
>
> Could it be documented somewhere appropriate?  Along with Nick's
> suggestion of prefixing the date with a space to prevent the problem.

Yes, it could be documented in an appropriate place in Worg.

Please suggest one and send a patch!

Best,

-- 
 Bastien



Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML

2012-04-10 Thread François Pinard
Bastien  writes:

> Hi François,

Bonjour, Bastien!

>> I added "Du " as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
>> directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description.  Is there a way, or is
>> it a limitation (or a bug)?

> I would call it a limitation.

Could it be documented somewhere appropriate?  Along with Nick's
suggestion of prefixing the date with a space to prevent the problem.

François



Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML

2012-04-10 Thread Bastien
Hi François,

pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes:

> I added "Du " as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
> directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description.  Is there a way, or is
> it a limitation (or a bug)?

I would call it a limitation.

-- 
 Bastien



Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML

2012-03-05 Thread Nick Dokos
François Pinard  wrote:

> 
> Given the following header contents:
> 
> * Problème date
> - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][2012-02-29]]
> - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][Du 2012-02-29]]
> 
> here is how it is shown in the Web browser after publishing:
> 
> 
> I added "Du " as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
> directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description.  Is there a way, or is
> it a limitation (or a bug)?
> 

[2012-02-29] looks like an inactive date, as well as the description of
a link.  I presume the ambiguity causes this problem, so you somehow
have to disambiguate it.  Prefixing it with Du (or just about anything,
including a space) is one way to do that.

So a limitation certainly - a bug? Maybe, maybe not.

Nick




[O] Problem with dates while generating HTML

2012-03-05 Thread François Pinard

Given the following header contents:

--8<---cut here---start->8---
* Problème date
- [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][2012-02-29]]
- [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][Du 2012-02-29]]
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

here is how it is shown in the Web browser after publishing:

<>
I added "Du " as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to
directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description.  Is there a way, or is
it a limitation (or a bug)?

François