Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML

2012-04-10 Thread Bastien
Bonjour François, pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes: > Bastien writes: > >> Hi François, > > Bonjour, Bastien! > >>> I added "Du " as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to >>> directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is >>> it a limitation (o

Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML

2012-04-10 Thread François Pinard
Bastien writes: > Hi François, Bonjour, Bastien! >> I added "Du " as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to >> directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is >> it a limitation (or a bug)? > I would call it a limitation. Could it be documented somewhere appr

Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML

2012-04-10 Thread Bastien
Hi François, pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes: > I added "Du " as a prefix to get going, but the ideal would be to > directly use 2012-02-29 as the link description. Is there a way, or is > it a limitation (or a bug)? I would call it a limitation. -- Bastien

Re: [O] Problem with dates while generating HTML

2012-03-05 Thread Nick Dokos
François Pinard wrote: > > Given the following header contents: > > * Problème date > - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][2012-02-29]] > - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][Du 2012-02-29]] > > here is how it is shown in the Web browser after publishing: > > > I added "Du " as a prefix to get going

[O] Problem with dates while generating HTML

2012-03-05 Thread François Pinard
Given the following header contents: --8<---cut here---start->8--- * Problème date - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][2012-02-29]] - [[file:2012-02-29.org::*Notes][Du 2012-02-29]] --8<---cut here---end--->8--- here is how it i