Re: [O] Why functions like org-show-subtree are undocumented?

2012-02-26 Thread Dave Abrahams
on Tue Jan 24 2012, Carsten Dominik wrote: > On 23.1.2012, at 16:27, Alexander Corvinus wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I just reviewed code in org.el and noticed that function >> org-show-subtree, which is called by org-cycle, unconditionally >> shows whole subtree (exactly what I wanted to have in

Re: [O] Why functions like org-show-subtree are undocumented?

2012-01-24 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 23.1.2012, at 16:27, Alexander Corvinus wrote: > Hi all, > > I just reviewed code in org.el and noticed that function org-show-subtree, > which is called by org-cycle, unconditionally shows whole subtree (exactly > what I wanted to have in my shortcuts!). > > So the question is - why such

Re: [O] Why functions like org-show-subtree are undocumented?

2012-01-24 Thread Bastien
Hi Alexander, Alexander Corvinus writes: > So the question is - why such useful functions like org-show-subtree, > hide-subtree, show-children aren't documented in manual? Because of > that, previously I thought that what I wanted was impossible (without > source change). Please submit a patch.

[O] Why functions like org-show-subtree are undocumented?

2012-01-23 Thread Alexander Corvinus
Hi all, I just reviewed code in org.el and noticed that function org-show-subtree, which is called by org-cycle, unconditionally shows whole subtree (exactly what I wanted to have in my shortcuts!). So the question is - why such useful functions like org-show-subtree, hide-subtree, show-children