[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Daniel Ravicher found 283 software patents that, if upheld as valid by the
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2020 at 7:25 AM
> From: "Jean Louis"
> To: "Christopher Dimech"
> Cc: neiljer...@gmail.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, "Richard Stallman"
> , tecos...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: LSP is Microsoft's patented protocol - Re: Em
I can understand that GNU and Org shall ignore patents and continue without
putting attention.
Jean
;Richard Stallman"
> Cc: neiljer...@gmail.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, tecos...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: LSP is Microsoft's patented protocol - Re: Emacs as an Org LSP
> server
>
> * Richard Stallman [2020-12-15 08:48]:
> > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email
* Richard Stallman [2020-12-15 08:48]:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> > Do you have evidence it is not
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Do you have evidence it is not patented?
That sort of question is not useful to
* TEC [2020-12-14 21:48]:
>
> Hi Jean,
>
> Please read my previous emails before re-iterating the same points.
>
> LSP is not patented, it's just referenced in a patent about MS's fancy
> remote development extension.
Do you have evidence it is not patented?
A patent need not be implemented
Hi Jean,
Please read my previous emails before re-iterating the same points.
LSP is not patented, it's just referenced in a patent about MS's fancy
remote development extension.
Jean Louis writes:
> Enrich it with unencumbered patent-free solutions.
That's what I'm doing :)
--
Timothy.
* TEC [2020-12-14 20:24]:
>
> Jean Louis writes:
>
> > [LSP is a evil plot from microsoft]
>
> Hi Jean,
>
> I can see that you're overly concerned about Microsoft being able to
> somehow exert control over this. It may assuage your concerns to see an
> example "technology stack" that Org-LSP
