Re: [O] #+LINK abbrevs possible in #+INCLUDEs ?

2015-04-30 Thread Alan Schmitt
On 2015-04-29 17:05, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Alan Schmitt writes: > >> Does this mean that #+INCLUDE is now a superset of #+SETUPFILE (I've had >> some cases where I needed to do both)? > > No, it isn't. > > INCLUDE are expanded only during export. SETUPFILE are read whenever you >

Re: [O] #+LINK abbrevs possible in #+INCLUDEs ?

2015-04-29 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Alan Schmitt writes: > Does this mean that #+INCLUDE is now a superset of #+SETUPFILE (I've had > some cases where I needed to do both)? No, it isn't. INCLUDE are expanded only during export. SETUPFILE are read whenever you open a document or use C-c C-c on a keyword. Regards, -- Ni

Re: [O] #+LINK abbrevs possible in #+INCLUDEs ?

2015-04-29 Thread Alan Schmitt
On 2015-04-27 20:46, Nicolas Goaziou writes: >>> Set-up (e.g., link abbreviations) is not refreshed after expanding >>> INCLUDE keywords. I cannot remember why, tho. Maybe for (dubious) >>> efficiency reasons. >> >> If you don't remember, may be it would be possible to try it out? >> Would love i

Re: [O] #+LINK abbrevs possible in #+INCLUDEs ?

2015-04-28 Thread Detlef Steuer
> > >> Set-up (e.g., link abbreviations) is not refreshed after expanding > >> INCLUDE keywords. I cannot remember why, tho. Maybe for (dubious) > >> efficiency reasons. > > > > If you don't remember, may be it would be possible to try it out? > > Would love it and as a feature it looks natural fo

Re: [O] #+LINK abbrevs possible in #+INCLUDEs ?

2015-04-27 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Detlef Steuer writes: > The real file2.org is somewhat big and would be scanned completely, > wouldn't it? Only special keywords are parsed. The advantage of SETUPFILE is that it works even outside of export. >> Set-up (e.g., link abbreviations) is not refreshed after expanding >> INCLUDE keyw

Re: [O] #+LINK abbrevs possible in #+INCLUDEs ?

2015-04-27 Thread Detlef Steuer
> Hello, > > Detlef Steuer writes: > > > I have two files: > > > > file1.org: > > > > #+LINK: HOME http://example.de > > > > * My Homepage You can find my homepage [[HOME][here]] > > > > #+INCLUDE: file2.org > > > > > > file2.org > >

Re: [O] #+LINK abbrevs possible in #+INCLUDEs ?

2015-04-27 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Detlef Steuer writes: > I have two files: > > file1.org: > > #+LINK: HOME http://example.de > > * My Homepage You can find my homepage [[HOME][here]] > > #+INCLUDE: file2.org > > > file2.org > #+LINK: HOME2 http://other.exampl