Re: [O] Regression tests and stderr

2012-03-01 Thread Achim Gratz
Sebastien Vauban
wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes:
 Pretty good. One failure, though, which I'll try to investigate (later on).

That's a new test from Nicolas which seems to need some testing
itself... :-)

 What's weird is the output that comes _after_ the above summary:

Let me guess, you are on a Windows console or running cmd in a shell
buffer?  Then the order of output between STDOUT / STDERR is not
predictable since by default both streams will be buffered.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]+

Samples for the Waldorf Blofeld:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldSamplesExtra




Re: [O] Regression tests and stderr

2012-03-01 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Achim,

Achim Gratz wrote:
 Sebastien Vauban
 wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com writes:
 Pretty good. One failure, though, which I'll try to investigate (later on).

 That's a new test from Nicolas which seems to need some testing
 itself... :-)

Just saw your reporting as well... Thanks for pointing out anyway.

 What's weird is the output that comes _after_ the above summary:

 Let me guess, you are on a Windows console or running cmd in a shell
 buffer?  Then the order of output between STDOUT / STDERR is not
 predictable since by default both streams will be buffered.

On Windows, yes. But in a MinTTY terminal with Cygwin.

I never have seen mixed (delayed) streams with other applications, but they
may be less verbose: exit on error, for example, while here a lot of output is
written anyway.

The delay is a problem. The fact that normal messages (vs only calls to
`error') are sent to `stderr' is another big, I think. We can't grep through
errors only, or check for some file to be empty (when redirecting stderr to a
file), or...

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban