Re: [O] unable to edit indirect-buffer in fundamental mode without losing pretty printing in base buffer org mode

> Nicolas Goaziou writes: > > I assume you mean that sub/superscript markers are hidden (i.e., > relevant configuration settings for WYSIWYG). > > But in what cases do users need to edit the textual markup? Can they be > avoided ? I use the markup to help read language with differing

Re: [O] unable to edit indirect-buffer in fundamental mode without losing pretty printing in base buffer org mode

Hello, Aaron Ecay writes: > +1 on this idea from me. I created a "next" branch that we can merge in master once we're out feature freeze. > I describe the problem as: Org tries to be slightly WYSIWYG in terms of > subscripts (with the relevant configuration settings). But the facade > over

Re: [O] unable to edit indirect-buffer in fundamental mode without losing pretty printing in base buffer org mode

Hi Nicolas, 2018ko maiatzak 27an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen: > > Aaron Ecay writes: > >> Of course, done in c32938b7f. I did not realize how the freeze for 9.2 >> was working. > > Thank you. > > BTW, I'm considering creating a "next" branch for pending patches that

Re: [O] unable to edit indirect-buffer in fundamental mode without losing pretty printing in base buffer org mode

Aaron Ecay writes: > Of course, done in c32938b7f. I did not realize how the freeze for 9.2 > was working. Thank you. BTW, I'm considering creating a "next" branch for pending patches that I'm refraining to push to master. It could help moving forward. >> However, your

Re: [O] unable to edit indirect-buffer in fundamental mode without losing pretty printing in base buffer org mode

Hi Nicolas, 2018ko maiatzak 27an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen: [...] > > Also, we are in feature freeze for Org 9.2, so this would need, in any > case, to wait for the release. > > As a consequence, would you mind reverting the patches related to this > feature? Of course, done in

Re: [O] unable to edit indirect-buffer in fundamental mode without losing pretty printing in base buffer org mode

Hello, Aaron Ecay writes: > OTOH, we need to provide a way to edit those curly braces. I have just > pushed commit 102832e66 to the master branch. That will cause any > sub/superscript under the point to have its font lock properties > removed, so that the braces will

Re: [O] unable to edit indirect-buffer in fundamental mode without losing pretty printing in base buffer org mode

Hi Van, What you describe is fragile and should not work. OTOH, we need to provide a way to edit those curly braces. I have just pushed commit 102832e66 to the master branch. That will cause any sub/superscript under the point to have its font lock properties removed, so that the braces will