Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
On my 32-bit Arch machine:
(string-to-number 123456789): 123456789 (#o726746425, #x75bcd15)
(string-to-number 987654321): 987654321.0
Since that latter number is not representable as an integer in Emacs (it
loses 4 bit due to the way Lisp represents
Just to be safe, I nuked my org-mode directory and re-cloned from the
git repository: I'm now at release_7.8.03.386.g2239d (I was at
release_7.8.03-351-g47eb3 previously). Is there a more recent
version? I also removed the org directory that came with the packaged
version of emacs, just in
On 02/19/2012 08:48 AM, Eric Schulte wrote:
Just to be safe, I nuked my org-mode directory and re-cloned from the
git repository: I'm now at release_7.8.03.386.g2239d (I was at
release_7.8.03-351-g47eb3 previously). Is there a more recent
version? I also removed the org directory that came with
On 02/19/2012 09:40 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
On 02/19/2012 08:48 AM, Eric Schulte wrote:
Just to be safe, I nuked my org-mode directory and re-cloned from the
git repository: I'm now at release_7.8.03.386.g2239d (I was at
release_7.8.03-351-g47eb3 previously). Is there a more recent
version? I
On 02/19/2012 10:28 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
On 02/19/2012 09:40 AM, Daniel Drake wrote:
On 02/19/2012 08:48 AM, Eric Schulte wrote:
Just to be safe, I nuked my org-mode directory and re-cloned from the
git repository: I'm now at release_7.8.03.386.g2239d (I was at
release_7.8.03-351-g47eb3
A further followup, at the risk of descending into minutia. The
culprit seems to be the emacs function string-to-number.
On my 32-bit Arch machine:
(string-to-number 123456789): 123456789 (#o726746425, #x75bcd15)
(string-to-number 987654321): 987654321.0
GNU Emacs 23.4.1
On Sun 19 Feb 2012 12:46:15 PM PST, Eric Schulte wrote:
A further followup, at the risk of descending into minutia. The
culprit seems to be the emacs function string-to-number.
On my 32-bit Arch machine:
(string-to-number 123456789): 123456789 (#o726746425, #x75bcd15)
(string-to-number
Eric Schulte eric.schu...@gmx.com writes:
A further followup, at the risk of descending into minutia. The
culprit seems to be the emacs function string-to-number.
On my 32-bit Arch machine:
(string-to-number 123456789): 123456789 (#o726746425, #x75bcd15)
(string-to-number 987654321):
Daniel Drake silopho...@gmail.com writes:
Hi All,
I'm using R in org-mode/babel to analyze data from a psychological
study. The subjects in this study are identified by nine digit integers
(e.g., 987654321) that I treat as strings (or factors) in my R data
frames.
Tables output by an R
On 02/18/2012 08:23 AM, Eric Schulte wrote:
Daniel Drakesilopho...@gmail.com writes:
Hi All,
I'm using R in org-mode/babel to analyze data from a psychological
study. The subjects in this study are identified by nine digit integers
(e.g., 987654321) that I treat as strings (or factors) in
Hi All,
I'm using R in org-mode/babel to analyze data from a psychological
study. The subjects in this study are identified by nine digit integers
(e.g., 987654321) that I treat as strings (or factors) in my R data
frames.
Tables output by an R code block that contain these subject IDs are
not
11 matches
Mail list logo
