Re: [O] [babel] sbe not working properly (resolved)
* Christian Moe wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi!
> I cannot replicate Karl's problem. I copied the code examples, and got
> the right results on Org 8.0-pre (pulled this morning).
>
> I did have to make one change -- Babel wouldn't recognize the variables
> until I passed them with :var rather than in parens after the codeblock
> name. (I saw there was some discussion on dropping the latter syntax;
> whoa -- has it already happened?)
I can confirm that using the :var syntax, it is working properly:
#+NAME: epoch2day
#+BEGIN_SRC python :results output :var epoch=1262675465119
time = epoch
import datetime
strtime = str(time)
datetimestamp = datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp(int(strtime[:10]))
print datetimestamp.strftime('[%Y-%m-%d %a %H:%M:%S]')
#+END_SRC
#+RESULTS: epoch2day
: [2010-01-05 Tue 07:11:05]
| epoch | day |
|---+---|
| 1262675465119 | [2010-01-05 Tue 07:11:05] |
|123456 | [1970-01-02 Fri 10:17:36] |
| 8754 | [1973-03-03 Sat 09:25:54] |
#+TBLFM: $2='(sbe epoch2day (epoch $1))
... works (and enriches my Org-mode capabilities enourmously! :-).
#+name: add1
#+begin_src python :results silent :var x=1
return x + 1
#+end_src
#+RESULTS: add1
: 2
| foo | bar | 3 | 4 |
#+TBLFM: @1$4='(sbe add1 (x $3))
... does work as well.
Thanks for pointing me to the change of syntax.
--
mail|git|SVN|photos|postings|SMS|phonecalls|RSS|CSV|XML to Org-mode:
> get Memacs from https://github.com/novoid/Memacs <
https://github.com/novoid/extract_pdf_annotations_to_orgmode + more on github
Re: [O] [babel] sbe not working properly
Christian Moe writes:
> Hi,
>
> I cannot replicate Karl's problem. I copied the code examples, and got
> the right results on Org 8.0-pre (pulled this morning).
>
> I did have to make one change -- Babel wouldn't recognize the variables
> until I passed them with :var rather than in parens after the codeblock
> name. (I saw there was some discussion on dropping the latter syntax;
> whoa -- has it already happened?)
Yes, this syntax has been removed.
> But that much was clear from the error messages I got, so Karl's
> problem must be something different.
>
> Yours,
> Christian
>
> Darlan Cavalcante Moreira writes:
>
>> I have my own difficulties using sbe and decided to try your example.
>>
>> I even created the shell babel block below which does the same think as the
>> python code
>>
>> #+NAME: epoch2dayshell(epoch=1)
>> #+begin_src sh
>> echo `date --d @$epoch -u +"[%F %a %T]"`
>> #+end_src
>>
>> but I got the same result. Actually, I realize a small detail.
>>
>> In your example, when you evaluated the table formula you got as result the
>> 1970 date. However, this does not mean that your python code was
>> executed. You got that answer because you have evaluated the python code
>> previously with the default argument (equal to 1) and thus you had
>>
>> #+RESULTS: epoch2day
>> : [1970-01-01 Thu 00:00:01]
>>
>> in your file. If you erase the #+RESULTS and reevaluate the table you will
>> get an ERROR. That indicates that sbe is not calling the babel block as I
>> (and probably you too) was expecting.
>>
>> However, looking at sbe's documentation I can't see anything wrong with the
>> formula you wrote. I'm still confused on how to correctly use sbe.
>>
>> --
>> Darlan
>>
>> At Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:26:12 +0200,
>> Karl Voit wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I want to define a babel function named epoch2day which I am able to use in
>>> a
>>> table to convert UNIX epoch times to Org-mode time stamps:
>>>
>>> #+NAME: epoch2day(epoch=1)
>>> #+BEGIN_SRC python :results output
>>> time = epoch
>>> import datetime
>>> strtime = str(time)
>>> datetimestamp =
>>> datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp(int(strtime[:10]))
>>> print datetimestamp.strftime('[%Y-%m-%d %a %H:%M:%S]')
>>> #+END_SRC
>>>
>>> #+RESULTS: epoch2day
>>> : [1970-01-01 Thu 00:00:01]
>>>
>>> ... this works so far. However, in a table I can't "overwrite" the default
>>> value with a column value:
>>>
>>> | epoch | day |
>>> |---+---|
>>> | 1262675465119 | [1970-01-01 Thu 00:00:01] |
>>> #+TBLFM: $2='(sbe epoch2day (epoch $1))
>>>
>>> ... but $2 should be: [2010-01-05 Tue 07:11:05]
>>>
>>>
>>> On [1] I found another example:
>>>
>>> #+name: add1(x=1) :results silent
>>> #+begin_src python
>>> return x + 1
>>> #+end_src
>>>
>>> #+RESULTS: add1
>>> : 2
>>>
>>> | foo | bar | 3 | 2 |
>>> #+TBLFM: @1$4='(sbe add1 (x $3))
>>>
>>> #+CALL: add1(x=2)
>>>
>>> #+RESULTS: add1(x=2)
>>> : 2
>>>
>>> So this simple example does not work either at my side[2].
>>>
>>>
>>> What is my error? Or did I found a bug?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9595310/org-babel-sbe-syntax
>>> 2. Org-mode 1af215bb4668bf3e778175e68fcaf from git
>>> --
>>> mail|git|SVN|photos|postings|SMS|phonecalls|RSS|CSV|XML to Org-mode:
>>>> get Memacs from https://github.com/novoid/Memacs <
>>>
>>> https://github.com/novoid/extract_pdf_annotations_to_orgmode + more on
>>> github
>>>
>>>
>
>
--
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
Re: [O] [babel] sbe not working properly
Hi,
I cannot replicate Karl's problem. I copied the code examples, and got
the right results on Org 8.0-pre (pulled this morning).
I did have to make one change -- Babel wouldn't recognize the variables
until I passed them with :var rather than in parens after the codeblock
name. (I saw there was some discussion on dropping the latter syntax;
whoa -- has it already happened?) But that much was clear from the error
messages I got, so Karl's problem must be something different.
Yours,
Christian
Darlan Cavalcante Moreira writes:
> I have my own difficulties using sbe and decided to try your example.
>
> I even created the shell babel block below which does the same think as the
> python code
>
> #+NAME: epoch2dayshell(epoch=1)
> #+begin_src sh
> echo `date --d @$epoch -u +"[%F %a %T]"`
> #+end_src
>
> but I got the same result. Actually, I realize a small detail.
>
> In your example, when you evaluated the table formula you got as result the
> 1970 date. However, this does not mean that your python code was
> executed. You got that answer because you have evaluated the python code
> previously with the default argument (equal to 1) and thus you had
>
> #+RESULTS: epoch2day
> : [1970-01-01 Thu 00:00:01]
>
> in your file. If you erase the #+RESULTS and reevaluate the table you will
> get an ERROR. That indicates that sbe is not calling the babel block as I
> (and probably you too) was expecting.
>
> However, looking at sbe's documentation I can't see anything wrong with the
> formula you wrote. I'm still confused on how to correctly use sbe.
>
> --
> Darlan
>
> At Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:26:12 +0200,
> Karl Voit wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I want to define a babel function named epoch2day which I am able to use in a
>> table to convert UNIX epoch times to Org-mode time stamps:
>>
>> #+NAME: epoch2day(epoch=1)
>> #+BEGIN_SRC python :results output
>> time = epoch
>> import datetime
>> strtime = str(time)
>> datetimestamp = datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp(int(strtime[:10]))
>> print datetimestamp.strftime('[%Y-%m-%d %a %H:%M:%S]')
>> #+END_SRC
>>
>> #+RESULTS: epoch2day
>> : [1970-01-01 Thu 00:00:01]
>>
>> ... this works so far. However, in a table I can't "overwrite" the default
>> value with a column value:
>>
>> | epoch | day |
>> |---+---|
>> | 1262675465119 | [1970-01-01 Thu 00:00:01] |
>> #+TBLFM: $2='(sbe epoch2day (epoch $1))
>>
>> ... but $2 should be: [2010-01-05 Tue 07:11:05]
>>
>>
>> On [1] I found another example:
>>
>> #+name: add1(x=1) :results silent
>> #+begin_src python
>> return x + 1
>> #+end_src
>>
>> #+RESULTS: add1
>> : 2
>>
>> | foo | bar | 3 | 2 |
>> #+TBLFM: @1$4='(sbe add1 (x $3))
>>
>> #+CALL: add1(x=2)
>>
>> #+RESULTS: add1(x=2)
>> : 2
>>
>> So this simple example does not work either at my side[2].
>>
>>
>> What is my error? Or did I found a bug?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> 1. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9595310/org-babel-sbe-syntax
>> 2. Org-mode 1af215bb4668bf3e778175e68fcaf from git
>> --
>> mail|git|SVN|photos|postings|SMS|phonecalls|RSS|CSV|XML to Org-mode:
>>> get Memacs from https://github.com/novoid/Memacs <
>>
>> https://github.com/novoid/extract_pdf_annotations_to_orgmode + more on github
>>
>>
Re: [O] [babel] sbe not working properly
I have my own difficulties using sbe and decided to try your example.
I even created the shell babel block below which does the same think as the
python code
#+NAME: epoch2dayshell(epoch=1)
#+begin_src sh
echo `date --d @$epoch -u +"[%F %a %T]"`
#+end_src
but I got the same result. Actually, I realize a small detail.
In your example, when you evaluated the table formula you got as result the
1970 date. However, this does not mean that your python code was
executed. You got that answer because you have evaluated the python code
previously with the default argument (equal to 1) and thus you had
#+RESULTS: epoch2day
: [1970-01-01 Thu 00:00:01]
in your file. If you erase the #+RESULTS and reevaluate the table you will
get an ERROR. That indicates that sbe is not calling the babel block as I
(and probably you too) was expecting.
However, looking at sbe's documentation I can't see anything wrong with the
formula you wrote. I'm still confused on how to correctly use sbe.
--
Darlan
At Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:26:12 +0200,
Karl Voit wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I want to define a babel function named epoch2day which I am able to use in a
> table to convert UNIX epoch times to Org-mode time stamps:
>
> #+NAME: epoch2day(epoch=1)
> #+BEGIN_SRC python :results output
> time = epoch
> import datetime
> strtime = str(time)
> datetimestamp = datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp(int(strtime[:10]))
> print datetimestamp.strftime('[%Y-%m-%d %a %H:%M:%S]')
> #+END_SRC
>
> #+RESULTS: epoch2day
> : [1970-01-01 Thu 00:00:01]
>
> ... this works so far. However, in a table I can't "overwrite" the default
> value with a column value:
>
> | epoch | day |
> |---+---|
> | 1262675465119 | [1970-01-01 Thu 00:00:01] |
> #+TBLFM: $2='(sbe epoch2day (epoch $1))
>
> ... but $2 should be: [2010-01-05 Tue 07:11:05]
>
>
> On [1] I found another example:
>
> #+name: add1(x=1) :results silent
> #+begin_src python
> return x + 1
> #+end_src
>
> #+RESULTS: add1
> : 2
>
> | foo | bar | 3 | 2 |
> #+TBLFM: @1$4='(sbe add1 (x $3))
>
> #+CALL: add1(x=2)
>
> #+RESULTS: add1(x=2)
> : 2
>
> So this simple example does not work either at my side[2].
>
>
> What is my error? Or did I found a bug?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> 1. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9595310/org-babel-sbe-syntax
> 2. Org-mode 1af215bb4668bf3e778175e68fcaf from git
> --
> mail|git|SVN|photos|postings|SMS|phonecalls|RSS|CSV|XML to Org-mode:
>> get Memacs from https://github.com/novoid/Memacs <
>
> https://github.com/novoid/extract_pdf_annotations_to_orgmode + more on github
>
>
[O] [babel] sbe not working properly
Hi!
I want to define a babel function named epoch2day which I am able to use in a
table to convert UNIX epoch times to Org-mode time stamps:
#+NAME: epoch2day(epoch=1)
#+BEGIN_SRC python :results output
time = epoch
import datetime
strtime = str(time)
datetimestamp = datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp(int(strtime[:10]))
print datetimestamp.strftime('[%Y-%m-%d %a %H:%M:%S]')
#+END_SRC
#+RESULTS: epoch2day
: [1970-01-01 Thu 00:00:01]
... this works so far. However, in a table I can't "overwrite" the default
value with a column value:
| epoch | day |
|---+---|
| 1262675465119 | [1970-01-01 Thu 00:00:01] |
#+TBLFM: $2='(sbe epoch2day (epoch $1))
... but $2 should be: [2010-01-05 Tue 07:11:05]
On [1] I found another example:
#+name: add1(x=1) :results silent
#+begin_src python
return x + 1
#+end_src
#+RESULTS: add1
: 2
| foo | bar | 3 | 2 |
#+TBLFM: @1$4='(sbe add1 (x $3))
#+CALL: add1(x=2)
#+RESULTS: add1(x=2)
: 2
So this simple example does not work either at my side[2].
What is my error? Or did I found a bug?
Thanks!
1. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9595310/org-babel-sbe-syntax
2. Org-mode 1af215bb4668bf3e778175e68fcaf from git
--
mail|git|SVN|photos|postings|SMS|phonecalls|RSS|CSV|XML to Org-mode:
> get Memacs from https://github.com/novoid/Memacs <
https://github.com/novoid/extract_pdf_annotations_to_orgmode + more on github
