Dear Tom,
> I suppose this depends on what is meant by "reproducible."
>
> My goal is to produce a compendium as defined by Gentleman and Lang
> (see Gentleman R, Lang DT (2004). "Statistical Analyses and Reproducible
> Research." Technical report, Bioconductor Project. URL
> http://www.bepress.c
Aaron Ecay writes:
> If your external org configuration file were kept under version control
> (I’ll discuss git but the principle is general), then reproducibility
> would be possible.
There's a lot more to reproducibility then just this, but yes, the
configuration files would have to be part of
Aloha Rasmus,
Rasmus writes:
> The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
> that has been posted to gmane.emacs.orgmode as well.
>
>
> Thomas,
>
>>> Tom, do tell us more about what these habits are.
>>
>> The new exporter is really your friend. Where before I might choose to
>> gene
Aaron Ecay writes:
> If your external org configuration file were kept under version control
> (I’ll discuss git but the principle is general), then reproducibility
> would be possible. There are ways of embedding git hashes in LaTeX
> documents (for one example:
> http://thorehusfeldt.net/2011/
Hi Rasmus,
2013ko apirilak 18an, Rasmus-ek idatzi zuen:
> I too rely heavily on filters and customizations. I haven't been able
> to fully appreciate the asynchronous exporter yet.
>
> For instance I set some defaults for tables, pictures, add lots of
> entities etc. in my init file, and I went
Thomas,
>> Tom, do tell us more about what these habits are.
>
> The new exporter is really your friend. Where before I might choose to
> generate a LaTeX block, now I look to generate Org output and then count
> on the exporter to do the right thing on the way to pdf.
>
> The exporter's attri
Hi Rainer,
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:55:50AM +0200, Rainer M. Krug wrote:
>
> I did not follow the initial thread, but the new header caught my
> attentian, as I am doing something similar with papers. Nothing against
> org for writing papers, but I prefer LyX [1]. But for doing the analysis,
>
Suvayu Ali writes:
> Hi Vikas,
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 03:40:22AM +0530, Vikas Rawal wrote:
>>
>> > At one point I realised the problem and made the decision to
>> > split things into two kinds of files: static content (document
>> > structuring, text, plots, etc), and dynamic content (babel
Hi Vikas,
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 03:40:22AM +0530, Vikas Rawal wrote:
>
> > At one point I realised the problem and made the decision to
> > split things into two kinds of files: static content (document
> > structuring, text, plots, etc), and dynamic content (babel, TikZ blocks
> > that generat
Aloha Vikas,
Vikas Rawal writes:
>> I've been down it too many times myself. The habits I've developed
>> over time have helped, but I think they are less systematic than
>> what you've devised.
>
> Tom, do tell us more about what these habits are.
The new exporter is really your friend. Where
> > I'm suggesting this because if you continue on this path, i.e. litter
> > your Org file with hacks, soon you will end up with an extremely fragile
> > and complicated Org project. I have been down that road while writing
> > my thesis.
I see the point. I think there is a need for document
11 matches
Mail list logo
