Hi Bastien,
On 3/24/13, Bastien b...@altern.org wrote:
So in Firefox for me at least, there is no blank line between
Footnotes: and 1.
Footnotes: is inserted as a h2 header in the HTML file.
So there should be a visual space after it.
I don't know why there isn't. I guess it means CSS is
On 3/19/13, Bastien b...@altern.org wrote:
It might be good to add a blank line after the Footnotes section.
The default is fine IMHO.
You'd need to define the #footnotes css id for this.
I'm not familiar with CSS enough to know here. It wouldn't come for
free with the header code? Here is
Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes:
I expected text after Footnotes (hmm, I should remove the colon if
possible) to be like text after any other section.
It is for me. Screenshots help a lot with those issues,
especially when they are often not bugs, but small quirks
wrt personal
Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes:
So in Firefox for me at least, there is no blank line between
Footnotes: and 1.
Footnotes: is inserted as a h2 header in the HTML file.
So there should be a visual space after it.
--
Bastien
Hi Samuel,
Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes:
It might be good to add a blank line after the Footnotes section.
The default is fine IMHO.
You'd need to define the #footnotes css id for this.
HTH,
--
Bastien
Hi Bastien,
On 3/12/13, Bastien b...@altern.org wrote:
Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes:
For some reason, I am getting no blank lines between footnotes, and no
blank lines between paragraphs in multi-paragraph footnotes. Any idea
why? Tested in Firefox.
This should now be fixed,
Hi Samuel,
Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes:
For some reason, I am getting no blank lines between footnotes, and no
blank lines between paragraphs in multi-paragraph footnotes. Any idea
why? Tested in Firefox.
This should now be fixed, thanks!
--
Bastien
Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com writes:
I asked him to remove ox-html.el and he indicated how he wanted to
proceed ahead. He wants ox-html.el in the tree and not GNU ELPA.
Just to prevent confusion: I never said anything like this.
ox-html.el is in the master branch of Org's repository,
Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com writes:
Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes:
On 3/9/13, Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com wrote:
I am sure Samuel will remind us infinitely if we forget about it.
Unless you say why it is confusing, I would count the above statement as
just
Bastien b...@altern.org writes:
Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com writes:
I asked him to remove ox-html.el and he indicated how he wanted to
proceed ahead. He wants ox-html.el in the tree and not GNU ELPA.
Just to prevent confusion: I never said anything like this.
ox-html.el is in
Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com writes:
I was typing faster. So I consider what I typed grammatically
malformed. Sorry.
No problem.
People who want improvements to ox-html.el should be willing to work
with me or act on my comments or argue with me or openly call me I am
wrong.
Thomas
I will reply to you in private.
I am talking to Samuels and Ricks who think that I have no right to
offer my opinions on what gets in to that file.
Jambunathan K.
Bastien b...@altern.org writes:
Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com writes:
I was typing faster. So I consider what I typed grammatically
malformed. Sorry.
No problem.
People who want improvements to ox-html.el should be willing to work
with me or act on my comments or argue with me
Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com writes:
I wrote the code, I know where it will bite. I will not say it, because
you seem so confident. Yes, go ahead and fix it.
Done, thanks.
--
Bastien
Aloha Jambunathan,
Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com writes:
Thomas
I will reply to you in private.
I am talking to Samuels and Ricks who think that I have no right to
offer my opinions on what gets in to that file.
If this is indeed what is being discussed, then there is no reason to
Hi Bastien,
Thanks for removing the table tags. It looks great in w3m. Much less
confusing.
For some reason, I am getting no blank lines between footnotes, and no
blank lines between paragraphs in multi-paragraph footnotes. Any idea
why? Tested in Firefox.
I can try to dig up old exporter
On 2/27/13, Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/13/13, Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, if you send the correct HTML that should be generated, I will
fix it.
Probably all that needs to be done is to not use a table. I tested this by
manually removing table td tr
Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes:
On 2/27/13, Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/13/13, Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, if you send the correct HTML that should be generated, I will
fix it.
Probably all that needs to be done is to not use a table. I
Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com writes:
They output a table, which looks IMO very confusing in both w3m and
Firefox. The old exporter worked fine. The solution IMO is to remove
the table tags.
I don't think footnotes export are confusing. I have seen people using
it and not complain
On 3/9/13, Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com wrote:
I am sure Samuel will remind us infinitely if we forget about it.
Unless you say why it is confusing, I would count the above statement as
just mis-information and not a fact that other parties could agree with.
You promised to leave:
On
Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes:
On 3/9/13, Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com wrote:
I am sure Samuel will remind us infinitely if we forget about it.
Unless you say why it is confusing, I would count the above statement as
just mis-information and not a fact that other parties
21 matches
Mail list logo
