Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-08-11 Thread Carsten Dominik
OK, thank you. - Carsten On 9.8.2013, at 13:02, Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca wrote: Hi Carsten! All of my headings are followed by an inactive timestamp. I've started leaving a blank line before the content for the heading so the inactive timestamp is not exported when timestamps are

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-08-09 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi guys, did you arrive at a conclusion of this thread, or is this still open? Thanks - Carsten On 16.4.2013, at 09:48, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote: Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: We

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-08-09 Thread Bernt Hansen
Hi Carsten! All of my headings are followed by an inactive timestamp. I've started leaving a blank line before the content for the heading so the inactive timestamp is not exported when timestamps are disabled with the :nil option. This works fine for me. Regards, Bernt Carsten Dominik

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-16 Thread Bastien
Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: We can widen the definition of `standalone': a standalone timestamp is a timestamp belonging to a paragraph that contains only timestamps objects. Great. If

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-15 Thread Bastien
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: The following patch should do that. It comes with tests, but it should be tested extensively, if only to know if this feature is as useful as it seems. Thanks a lot. I will not be online for the next 5 hours, but I'll think about this. --

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-14 Thread Bastien
Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: I would find it both cleaner and more useful for users to extend `org-export-with-timestamps' with three choices: 'inactive-not-standalone 'active-not-standalone 'not-standalone This

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-14 Thread Bastien
Sebastien Vauban wxhgmqzgwmuf-genee64ty+gs+fvcfc7...@public.gmane.org writes: Wouldn't it be a good moment to introduce APPT: 2013-04-13 Sat or maybe better named EVENT: 2013-04-13 Sat for things that only apply for today? In master, there is the new agenda entry type :scheduled*

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-14 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: Let's not implement my proposal and stick to your implementation of the exceptions you first proposed. Before we throw the baby out with the bath water, I want to make sure we are understanding each other. I expect users will want a way to get rid of

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-14 Thread Bastien
Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: According to your suggestion, with `org-export-with-timestamps' set to `not-standalone', in the following example: * Task timestamp At timestamp, I must do that. the first timestamp would be ignored, not the second one. Isn't it

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-14 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: According to your suggestion, with `org-export-with-timestamps' set to `not-standalone', in the following example: * Task timestamp At timestamp, I must do that. the first timestamp would be ignored, not the

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-14 Thread Bastien
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Then why do you suggest to drop the idea (for now)? Because IIUC, the time-stamps would not be ignored here * Task 2013-04-14 dim. 2013-04-16 dim. because 2013-04-14 dim. 2013-04-16 dim. is a paragraph. (The agenda takes both time-stamps

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-14 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Then why do you suggest to drop the idea (for now)? Because IIUC, the time-stamps would not be ignored here * Task 2013-04-14 dim. 2013-04-16 dim. because 2013-04-14 dim. 2013-04-16 dim. is a

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-14 Thread Bastien
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: We can widen the definition of `standalone': a standalone timestamp is a timestamp belonging to a paragraph that contains only timestamps objects. Great. If that's possible, then I think that's the best solution. -- Bastien

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-14 Thread Jambunathan K
Nicolas You may want to extract the below function as a useful API. You can then plug that in into `org-odt--standalone-link-p' and it's counterpart in ox-html.el. I am not closely tracking changes in ox-html.el, so things might have moved since. Jambunathan K. Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-13 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Thinking more about it, I think I need to make some more exceptions anyway. For example timestamps in clock lines and in planning info shouldn't react to `org-export-with-timestamps' (it would be silly to have

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-13 Thread Bastien
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Is that OK with you? I still resist this idea. I would find it both cleaner and more useful for users to extend `org-export-with-timestamps' with three choices: 'inactive-not-standalone 'active-not-standalone 'not-standalone When

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-13 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: I would find it both cleaner and more useful for users to extend `org-export-with-timestamps' with three choices: 'inactive-not-standalone 'active-not-standalone 'not-standalone This is a different idea. The change would happen at the exporter

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-13 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hello, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: I would find it both cleaner and more useful for users to extend `org-export-with-timestamps' with three choices: 'inactive-not-standalone 'active-not-standalone 'not-standalone This is a different idea. The

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-11 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Bastien b...@gnu.org writes: Note that Org 8.0-pre comes with a new export option `org-export-with-planning' which handles the export of SCHEDULED / DEADLINE / CLOSED time-stamps. This used to be the job of org-export-with-timestamps. I guess many people who used (setq

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-11 Thread Bastien
Hello, Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Thinking more about it, I think I need to make some more exceptions anyway. For example timestamps in clock lines and in planning info shouldn't react to `org-export-with-timestamps' (it would be silly to have `org-export-with-planning' set

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-10 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: Some people throw in time stamps often while they work, just as a little label, indicating that they were working on this at a specific date, or that the entry was created on a specific date. Many people I know have a hook that throws

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-10 Thread Carsten Dominik
This looks good to me - with my limited understanding of the exporter lingo. Thanks! - Carsten On 10 apr. 2013, at 14:43, Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: Some people throw in time stamps often while they work, just as

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-10 Thread Bastien
Hi all, Note that Org 8.0-pre comes with a new export option `org-export-with-planning' which handles the export of SCHEDULED / DEADLINE / CLOSED time-stamps. This used to be the job of org-export-with-timestamps. I guess many people who used (setq org-export-with-timestamps nil) now want (setq

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-09 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 8 apr. 2013, at 21:49, Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: On 8 apr. 2013, at 13:27, Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca wrote: Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca writes: I have

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-08 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca writes: I have subtrees with inactive timestamps in the text indicating when something occurred. I normally don't want to export these. But I think any table data that includes inactive timestamps should be an exception to this ... otherwise you get

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-08 Thread Bernt Hansen
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca writes: I have subtrees with inactive timestamps in the text indicating when something occurred. I normally don't want to export these. But I think any table data that includes inactive timestamps should be an

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-08 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 8 apr. 2013, at 13:27, Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca wrote: Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca writes: I have subtrees with inactive timestamps in the text indicating when something occurred. I normally don't want to export these. But I think

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-08 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: On 8 apr. 2013, at 13:27, Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca wrote: Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com writes: Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca writes: I have subtrees with inactive timestamps in the text indicating when something

[O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-07 Thread Bernt Hansen
Hi Nicolas, I just noticed that the new exporter does not export inactive timestamps in table columns. This is now controlled by the option :t I think this is a change from the old exporter (but I'm not sure it's really wrong). I have subtrees with inactive timestamps in the text indicating

Re: [O] New exporter and dates in tables

2013-04-07 Thread Mike McLean
On Apr 7, 2013, at 8:05 PM, Bernt Hansen be...@norang.ca wrote: Hi Nicolas, I just noticed that the new exporter does not export inactive timestamps in table columns. This is now controlled by the option :t I think this is a change from the old exporter (but I'm not sure it's really