Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Bastien b...@altern.org wrote:
Hi Nick,
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Well, the non-interactiveness and the next day are because the four
items I marked were the last four items for that date, so after marking
them, the cursor
I'm running from git, updating every few weeks, currently on
commit c276eeebeecba23913547f62cf4b8122f0e8efa9
Author: Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Sep 5 03:33:16 2012 +0530
(that commit is surely not relevant to my question...).
I often hope to get more done than I do,
Hi Greg,
Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com writes:
I often hope to get more done than I do, so I'm often faced with pushing
scheduled items forward. I typically do this from the agenda view, with
'C-c C-s' for individual items, and markings and 'B s' for groups of
items (typically, saturday-type
Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
I'm running from git, updating every few weeks, currently on
commit c276eeebeecba23913547f62cf4b8122f0e8efa9
Author: Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Sep 5 03:33:16 2012 +0530
(that commit is surely not relevant to my
Bastien b...@altern.org wrote:
Hi Greg,
Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com writes:
I often hope to get more done than I do, so I'm often faced with pushing
scheduled items forward. I typically do this from the agenda view, with
'C-c C-s' for individual items, and markings and 'B s' for
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
org-exp-blocks.el seems to have been deleted but org-exp.el still requires it.
What's going on?
(This is not related to the bug mentioned in this thread.)
I guess Nicolas is on this, I'll not interfere here, but yes,
this is a problem.
--
Bastien
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:
Bastien b...@altern.org wrote:
Hi Greg,
Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com writes:
I often hope to get more done than I do, so I'm often faced with pushing
scheduled items forward. I typically do this from the agenda view, with
'C-c C-s' for
Hello,
Bastien b...@altern.org writes:
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
org-exp-blocks.el seems to have been deleted but org-exp.el still requires
it.
What's going on?
(This is not related to the bug mentioned in this thread.)
I guess Nicolas is on this, I'll not interfere
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
I'm running from git, updating every few weeks, currently on
commit c276eeebeecba23913547f62cf4b8122f0e8efa9
Author: Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Sep 5 03:33:16 2012 +0530
(that
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Bastien b...@altern.org writes:
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
org-exp-blocks.el seems to have been deleted but org-exp.el still requires
it.
What's going on?
(This is not related to the bug mentioned in this
Hi all
I didn’t yet investigate further but wanted to throw this in because I
think it is related: Since a few weeks “C-c C-s + 1 2 : 0 0” does not
keep tomorrow’s date but falls back to today after typing the time
part has been completed. I know there is “C-c C-s Shift-Right 1 2 : 0
0” but this
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:
Nicolas Goaziou n.goaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Bastien b...@altern.org writes:
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
org-exp-blocks.el seems to have been deleted but org-exp.el still
requires it.
What's going on?
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
... and after going back to before Nicolas's last four commits, I get
the attached backtrace in org-agenda-list:
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument wholenump -1)
make-string(-1 32)
This is hopefully fixed now.
Thanks for testing,
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Reverting commits
Yes -- but please bare with us, we want the feature to
stabilize :)
--
Bastien
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Not quite: I now get the following backtrace.
Can you send me a reproducible minimal recipe?
--
Bastien
Bastien b...@altern.org wrote:
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Reverting commits
Yes -- but please bare with us, we want the feature to
stabilize :)
I meant that as a pointer of where things went off the rails -
I certainly don't expect you to revert the commits.
Thanks,
Bastien b...@altern.org wrote:
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Not quite: I now get the following backtrace.
Can you send me a reproducible minimal recipe?
Not sure - the last thing that .emacs does is bring up the agenda.
Let me try to investigate a bit what exactly breaks.
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:
Bastien b...@altern.org wrote:
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Not quite: I now get the following backtrace.
Can you send me a reproducible minimal recipe?
Not sure - the last thing that .emacs does is bring up the agenda.
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:
Bastien b...@altern.org wrote:
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Not quite: I now get the following backtrace.
Can you send me a reproducible minimal recipe?
Not sure - the
I turned off the grid for now as a workaround for the formatting
problems.
Going back to the original problem, I'm still having problems with that:
I mark a bunch of agenda items (scheduled for today) and then do a B s.
It reschedules them for tomorrow, no questions asked. If I repeat the
process
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:
I turned off the grid for now as a workaround for the formatting
problems.
Going back to the original problem, I'm still having problems with that:
I mark a bunch of agenda items (scheduled for today) and then do a B s.
It reschedules them for
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:
I turned off the grid for now as a workaround for the formatting
problems.
Going back to the original problem, I'm still having problems with that:
I mark a bunch of agenda items (scheduled for today)
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Not sure - the last thing that .emacs does is bring up the agenda.
Let me try to investigate a bit what exactly breaks.
Something goes awry with the agenda time grid.
Argh, great that you could isolate this.
There was an error here, I just fixed it.
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
org-agenda-format-item changed its calling sequence in b508ff69.
I haven't checked all the call sites in org-agenda.el but there is
a call site in org.el that apparently was missed, as well as the
declaration of the function in the same file.
Fixed,
Hi Michael,
Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com writes:
I didn’t yet investigate further but wanted to throw this in because I
think it is related: Since a few weeks “C-c C-s + 1 2 : 0 0” does not
keep tomorrow’s date but falls back to today after typing the time
part has been
Hi Nick,
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Well, the non-interactiveness and the next day are because the four
items I marked were the last four items for that date, so after marking
them, the cursor happened to be on the date line for the next day, which
apparently is taken as an
Bastien b...@altern.org wrote:
Hi Nick,
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
Well, the non-interactiveness and the next day are because the four
items I marked were the last four items for that date, so after marking
them, the cursor happened to be on the date line for the next
Hi Bastien
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Bastien b...@altern.org wrote:
This is fixed now, thanks for reporting this!
Confirmed, both in an Org buffer and in the agenda buffer. Thank you.
Michael
28 matches
Mail list logo
