Hi Dan,
Dan Davison writes:
> org-icons needs to be moved into contrib/, hooked in via a
> lightweight patch against org.el, instead of being implemented as a
> monolithic change to org.el. I made a start on that in this branch:
>
> https://github.com/dandavison/org-devel/tree/org-icons
Great -
Oké Dan,
Understood. That sounds right; to move all the code into the
org-icons.el file. That way the patch is no longer needed, and
org-icons can live in the contrib dir (together with a directory for
the images).
I think its best if I make a fork of your repo. That gives me some
space for worki
Hi Renzo,
org-icons needs to be moved into contrib/, hooked in via a lightweight patch
against org.el, instead of being implemented as a monolithic change to
org.el. I made a start on that in this branch:
https://github.com/dandavison/org-devel/tree/org-icons
but I'm not sure that I got very far
Hi Renzo,
Renzo Been writes:
> However, some things about the org-icons package... It seems to be a little
> outdated. Are there many org-moders out there still using it?
I'm not using it.
> Were there
> ever any plans to include it in the org-distribution?
I don't know, I wasn't aware of
Bastien altern.org> writes:
>
> Hi Philipp,
>
> Philipp Haselwarter gmx.de> writes:
>
> > Is there any particular reason for it to be hardcoded? Apart from the
> > fact that /well it just is this way right now/ I mean.
>
> Nothing carved in stone, but here are the two reasons I see:
>
> - w
