Michael Strey writes:
>> - You should use `org-link-display-format' instead of
>> `org-contacts-strip-link'.
>
> I don't think so. `org-link-display-format' returns the description of
> the link if there is one. My `org-contacts-strip-link' always returns
> the target. Using `org-link-displa
Hi Greg,
Thank you for looking into my debut feature!
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:22:14AM +0200, Daimrod wrote:
> Michael Strey writes:
[...]
> > It allows entries like in the following example without effecting
> > org-contacts current functions.
> >
> > #+BEGIN_SRC org
> > * Surname, Name
> >
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 07:25:38AM -0500, Robert P. Goldman wrote:
[...]
> The reason I am reluctant to adopt tel: is that that would suggest we
> should adopt the phone number syntax of RFC 3966. I confess that I
> haven't slogged my way through it, nor am I likely to have time to in
> the near
Feng Shu writes:
> Daimrod writes:
>
>>
>> I agree with you, it would be much better if org-contacts managed
>> links
>> within properties.
> I think the two format have less difference
>
> org-android and org-android-NG can't show properties like outline,
> I expect to see the implement of this
Daimrod writes:
>
> I agree with you, it would be much better if org-contacts managed
> links
> within properties.
I think the two format have less difference
org-android and org-android-NG can't show properties like outline,
I expect to see the implement of this feature
>
> I'll look at Mic
Michael Strey writes:
Hello Michael,
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 09:31:40AM +0200, Michael Strey wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> The problem is on the side of org-contacts. Org-contacts does not
>> support links in its properties.
> [...]
>
>> This shortcoming effects not only the phone links but email lin
Feng Shu writes:
Hello Feng,
> Bastien writes:
>
>> Hi Feng,
>>
>> Feng Shu writes:
>>
>>> [update diff] make output format more beautiful
>>
>> thanks for the patch -- at first sight, the formatting should be
>> fixed, let's try to avoid lines longer than 80 characters. But in
>> general, I'
Well, but note that we don't use file URLs -- we have special org hyperlinks
with their own syntax...
The reason I am reluctant to adopt tel: is that that would suggest we should
adopt the phone number syntax of RFC 3966. I confess that I haven't slogged my
way through it, nor am I likely to ha
Michael Strey writes:
> Here is the most important part of Mat's reply:
>
> ,
> | note that "tel:" is a common uri for indicating that something is a
> | telephone number (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3966)
> `
>
> Seems that we should prefer 'tel' as key for the phone link.
+1
--
: Er
Bastien writes:
> Hi Feng,
>
> thanks for your reply.
>
> I'll let Grégoire decide on what to apply to org-contacts.el.
>
> Best,
It's a good decision
--
Hi Feng,
thanks for your reply.
I'll let Grégoire decide on what to apply to org-contacts.el.
Best,
--
Bastien
Bastien writes:
> Hi Feng,
>
> Feng Shu writes:
>
>> [update diff] make output format more beautiful
>
> thanks for the patch -- at first sight, the formatting should be
> fixed, let's try to avoid lines longer than 80 characters. But in
> general, I'd be more comfortable with someone taking or
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 09:31:40AM +0200, Michael Strey wrote:
[...]
> The problem is on the side of org-contacts. Org-contacts does not
> support links in its properties.
[...]
> This shortcoming effects not only the phone links but email links as
> well.
Attached is a patch to allow org link
Hi Feng,
Feng Shu writes:
> [update diff] make output format more beautiful
thanks for the patch -- at first sight, the formatting should be
fixed, let's try to avoid lines longer than 80 characters. But in
general, I'd be more comfortable with someone taking org-contacts.el
in charge: I copy
[update diff] make output format more beautiful
>From 500694de70f14095acc765875182d65feab7ef85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Feng Shu
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 22:00:03 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] org-contacts.el, export contacts to outline-format
* contrib/lisp/org-contacts.el (org-contacts-outline-f
Michael Strey writes:
> Robert,
>
> On Mo, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:44:12 -0500, Robert Goldman wrote:
>> Michael Strey wrote:
>> > Currently org-phone.el as well as my org-dial.el are incompatible with
>> > org-contacts. The only idea behind my proposal was to make the
>> > contributors
>> > of both
Here is the most important part of Mat's reply:
,
| note that "tel:" is a common uri for indicating that something is a
| telephone number (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3966)
`
Seems that we should prefer 'tel' as key for the phone link.
Regards
--
Michael Strey
www.strey.biz
FYI, I just posted the following mail to the MobileOrg mailing list.
,
| Hello,
|
| I'm using a contact data base inspired by org-contacts, where contact
| details are stored in the properties drawer.
|
| First question: Are there any plans to show drawer content in the MobileOrg
| read view
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 07:19:35AM -0500, Robert Goldman wrote:
[...]
> Again, I am not an org-contacts user, so this may be a stupid question,
> but how does org-contacts "know" when it has a contact? I am looking at
> the sample record you present above, and it looks just like an org-mode
> he
Michael Strey wrote:
> Robert,
>
> On Mo, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:44:12 -0500, Robert Goldman wrote:
>> Michael Strey wrote:
>>> Currently org-phone.el as well as my org-dial.el are incompatible with
>>> org-contacts. The only idea behind my proposal was to make the contributors
>>> of both packages a
Michael Strey writes:
> Robert,
>
> On Do, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:38:48 -0500, Robert P. Goldman wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> I will be happy to include this into contrib (and do the relevant
>> assignment) at any time when people think that it is sufficiently ready
>> to go. I have been testing it in cont
Robert,
On Mo, Apr 08, 2013 at 09:44:12 -0500, Robert Goldman wrote:
> Michael Strey wrote:
> > Currently org-phone.el as well as my org-dial.el are incompatible with
> > org-contacts. The only idea behind my proposal was to make the contributors
> > of both packages aware of each other.
>
> Can
Michael Strey wrote:
> Currently org-phone.el as well as my org-dial.el are incompatible with
> org-contacts. The only idea behind my proposal was to make the contributors
> of both packages aware of each other.
Can you explain what makes org-phone incompatible with org-contacts?
Maybe my naming
On Mo, Apr 08, 2013 at 07:47:52 -0500, Robert Goldman wrote:
> Michael Strey wrote:
[...]
> > What about integrating these few functions into org-contacts?
>
> I am very reluctant to do this.
>
> I don't use org-contacts at all, but I *do* like to have phone numbers
> in my TODO items.
Actua
Michael Strey wrote:
> Robert,
>
> On Do, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:38:48 -0500, Robert P. Goldman wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> I will be happy to include this into contrib (and do the relevant
>> assignment) at any time when people think that it is sufficiently ready
>> to go. I have been testing it in cont
Robert,
On Do, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:38:48 -0500, Robert P. Goldman wrote:
[...]
> I will be happy to include this into contrib (and do the relevant
> assignment) at any time when people think that it is sufficiently ready
> to go. I have been testing it in contrib/ in a testing branch in my git
>
Hi Simon,
Simon Thum writes:
> (setq org-contacts-matcher "BIRTHDAY<>\"\"|ADR<>\"\"|EMAIL<>\"\"|TEL<>\"\"")
>
> to be able to find contacts not having an email. Something like it would
> need to become the new default.
This now uses
(mapconcat 'identity (list org-contacts-email-property
Bastien,
one more thing: I have
(setq org-contacts-matcher "BIRTHDAY<>\"\"|ADR<>\"\"|EMAIL<>\"\"|TEL<>\"\"")
to be able to find contacts not having an email. Something like it would
need to become the new default.
Cheers,
Simon
On 04/05/2013 08:42 AM, Bastien wrote:
Hi Simon,
Simon Thum
Hi,
seem like I am losing the work/home distinction. Not terribly useful (to
me at least), so ok.
I do have several contact with more than one number though, and I also
like to use spaces to delineate phone number part, like [country SPACE
city SPACE subscriber]. Therefore it would be useful
Hi Simon,
Simon Thum writes:
> Since you're at it: I keep the attached patch personally. I use it to sync
> org-contacts entries to my phone.
I applied Feng's patches against org-contacts.el, maybe you don't need
your patch anymore.
Best,
--
Bastien
On 4/4/13 Apr 4 -3:38 PM, Simon Thum wrote:
> Since you're at it: I keep the attached patch personally. I use it to
> sync org-contacts entries to my phone.
>
> I didn't sign up to the FSF so far, and suck at maintaining emacs commit
> msg conventions. If the patch is interesting I'll do what is r
On 4/4/13 Apr 4 -7:15 AM, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Robert Goldman writes:
>
>> The two files are below, in hopes of getting suggestions for improvement
>> so that someday this could find itself into contrib/.
>
> Looks like a good start -- please keep us updated about your progress
> and
Since you're at it: I keep the attached patch personally. I use it to
sync org-contacts entries to my phone.
I didn't sign up to the FSF so far, and suck at maintaining emacs commit
msg conventions. If the patch is interesting I'll do what is required.
Cheers,
Simon
On 04/04/2013 02:15 PM,
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:26:53AM +0200, Michael Strey wrote:
[...]
> Usually my phone links look like [[tel:+49 351 4129535]]; but since I
> imported data sets from a larger contact data base that had evolved over
> time, I ended up with stuff like this in my data base:
> 1. [[tel:0033 (0) 4568
Hi Robert,
Robert Goldman writes:
> The two files are below, in hopes of getting suggestions for improvement
> so that someday this could find itself into contrib/.
Looks like a good start -- please keep us updated about your progress
and your will to include this in contrib/, I'm sure many use
Hi Robert,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 10:05:57AM -0500, Robert Goldman wrote:
> On 4/3/13 Apr 3 -9:52 AM, Michael Strey wrote:
> > This gives me the opportunitie to publish my own attempt to implement
> > telephone functionality into org. I'm using Linphone
> > (http://www.linphone.org/) instead of
On 4/3/13 Apr 3 -9:52 AM, Michael Strey wrote:
> This gives me the opportunitie to publish my own attempt to implement
> telephone functionality into org. I'm using Linphone
> (http://www.linphone.org/) instead of Skype.
Thanks! I am folding the linphone code in to make org-phone more generic.
This gives me the opportunitie to publish my own attempt to implement
telephone functionality into org. I'm using Linphone
(http://www.linphone.org/) instead of Skype.
Best regards
--
Michael Strey
www.strey.biz
;;; org-dial.el --- Provide org links to dial with the softphone
;;; application li
On 3/29/13 Mar 29 -6:23 PM, Robert Goldman wrote:
> Since I keep my todo tasks in my org files, and some of them involve
> phone calls, I made a rudimentary handler for "phone:" links that I
> would like to contribute. It features a link declaration (in
> org-phone.el) and an ancillary script (cur
* Robert Goldman wrote:
> Since I keep my todo tasks in my org files, and some of them involve
> phone calls, I made a rudimentary handler for "phone:" links that I
> would like to contribute. It features a link declaration (in
> org-phone.el) and an ancillary script (currently only working on Ma
Since I keep my todo tasks in my org files, and some of them involve
phone calls, I made a rudimentary handler for "phone:" links that I
would like to contribute. It features a link declaration (in
org-phone.el) and an ancillary script (currently only working on Mac OS
X, but should be translatabl
41 matches
Mail list logo
