Re: [O] New version of VimOrganizer, an Org-mode clone in Vim

Tom Short writes: > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Herbert Sitz wrote: >> Michael Brand gmail.com> writes: >>> > >>> or at a similar place that there is also the possibility to have the >>> vi modal editing paradigm and most of the vi key bindings within Emacs >>> itself by using a vi emulatio

Re: [O] Add publishing with utf8

> My html files are exported with charset=utf-8. I believe that that's > because my org-mode buffers are utf-8 and ultimately because I've > set LANG=en_US.UTF-8. > > Try the following when visiting your org file (actually, a backup of > your org file :-)) > > o C-x RET f utf-8 RET > > o Save th

Re: [O] : Search for missing :END:

Nick Dokos writes: [snip] > But assuming that you are getting some error from org, you don't know > where the problem is and you are trying to find it, it will be simpler > to just use egrep: > > grep -E -n ':PROPERTIES:|:END:' foo.org > > will filter out the relevant lines, so all you have t

Re: [O] HTML export and Zotero-friendly headers

Hi, Then I misunderstood you, sorry about the noise (to both Eriks, A. and H.). I thought you meant including Zotero-readable metadata for each citation in the Org document. Do I then understand correctly that what you want to do is simply to generate one COinS snippet with metadata about th

Re: [O] [org-babel] switching off (re-)evaluation of code blocks during Org export

Hi Eric, Eric Schulte wrote: > Torsten Anders writes: >> Thanks a lot for your kind replies. However, this is not yet quite what I am >> after. >> >> I want to be able to manually execute each code block, but not >> automatically whenever the whole document is rendered. So, I would >> always swi

Re: [O] [PATCH] new babel latex feature :imagemagick

FSF papers are signed and the process is completed - so the revert can be reverted now (the patch should still apply). Sorry for the long delay...

[O] Babel Tangling Only Blocks Under One Heading in a File with Multiple Blocks.

I am using org to keep configuration files for my various servers. A typical file might look like: * Postfix ** main.cf #+BEGIN_SRC sh :tangle ~/dropbox/configuration_files/wilkesley.org/postfix/main.cf :exports none :noweb yes #+END_SRC ** master.cf * Dovecot ** dovecot.conf Mostly I only

Re: [O] Babel Tangling Only Blocks Under One Heading in a File with Multiple Blocks.

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Ian Barton wrote: > I am using org to keep configuration files for my various servers. A > typical file might look like: > > * Postfix > ** main.cf > #+BEGIN_SRC sh :tangle ~/dropbox/configuration_files/** > wilkesley.org/postfix/main.cf

Re: [O] [ANN] Org Elements in contrib

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > I've added org-element.el in contrib directory. It is a complete parser > and interpreter for Org syntax. > > While it was written to be extensible, it is also an attempt to > normalize current syntax and provide guidance for its evolution

Re: [O] Babel Tangling Only Blocks Under One Heading in a File with Multiple Blocks.

On 22/11/11 13:46, Rainer M Krug wrote: On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Ian Barton mailto:li...@wilkesley.net>> wrote: I am using org to keep configuration files for my various servers. A typical file might look like: * Postfix ** main.cf #+BEGIN_SRC sh :

Re: [O] TABLES: split cells on columns

Thank you very much!!! Just one point In my case at least M- does not insert a new line! >From the comment of the key sequence: -- org-metadown is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `org.el'. (org-metadown &optional ARG) Move subtree do

[O] [babel] (Almost) Add SQL*Plus engine

Hi Eric, I almost added the engine `sqlplus' (from Oracle Instant client) to `ob-sql': #+begin_src emacs-lisp ('sqlplus (format "sqlplus -S %s @%s > %s" (or cmdline "") (org-babel-process-file-name in-file) (org-babel-process-file-name out-f

Re: [O] TABLES: split cells on columns

Hi Daniel On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 15:26, Daniel Martins wrote: > Thank you very much!!! > Just one point > In my case at least M- does not insert a new line! ^ Yes, my fault. Corrigendum: 1) M-S- to add the new row 2) mark the region from "t" down to any char from

Re: [O] : Search for missing :END:

Olaf Dietsche wrote: > Nick Dokos writes: > > [snip] > > But assuming that you are getting some error from org, you don't know > > where the problem is and you are trying to find it, it will be simpler > > to just use egrep: > > > > grep -E -n ':PROPERTIES:|:END:' foo.org > > > > will filte

Re: [O] HTML export and Zotero-friendly headers

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011, Christian Moe wrote: > Hi, > > Then I misunderstood you, sorry about the noise (to both Eriks, A. and > H.). I thought you meant including Zotero-readable metadata for each > citation in the Org document. No problem. I tried to be clear, but obviously I wasn't. :) > Do I th

Re: [O] [ANN] Org Elements in contrib

Aloha Nicolas, This looks brilliant. The interactive functions seem to know their way around my various org-mode files. Looking forward to the generic exporter and the LaTeX back-end. All the best, Tom Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > > I've added org-element.el in contrib directory. It

Re: [O] [org-babel] switching off (re-)evaluation of code blocks during Org export

> > Hence, maybe we should be able to set 2 possible behaviors[1] for the >`eval' > parameter: > > - one for the interactive mode (yes/query/no), and > - one for the export mode (yes/no, and maybe query as well?). > Agreed, The eval header argument now supports the following four options (updated

Re: [O] [BUG] Inconsistency in src block hiding

>> If you have, from top to bottom, "name", "results" "header", nothing >> will fold. In all those cases, I think a consistent behaviour could >> be to hide the block, with any number of keywords above, and TAB >> pressed at any of them. >> > > Yes, I would agree, the hiding should be smart enough

Re: [O] [PATCH] new babel latex feature :imagemagick

Applied, thanks -- Eric Andreas Leha writes: > FSF papers are signed and the process is completed - so the revert can > be reverted now (the patch should still apply). > Sorry for the long delay... > > -- Eric Schulte http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/

Re: [O] [org-babel] switching off (re-)evaluation of code blocks during Org export

Eric Schulte writes: >> >> Hence, maybe we should be able to set 2 possible behaviors[1] for the >>`eval' >> parameter: >> >> - one for the interactive mode (yes/query/no), and >> - one for the export mode (yes/no, and maybe query as well?). >> > > Agreed, > > The eval header argument now support

Re: [O] [org-babel] switching off (re-)evaluation of code blocks during Org export

Bernt Hansen writes: > Eric Schulte writes: > >>> >>> Hence, maybe we should be able to set 2 possible behaviors[1] for the >>>`eval' >>> parameter: >>> >>> - one for the interactive mode (yes/query/no), and >>> - one for the export mode (yes/no, and maybe query as well?). >>> >> >> Agreed, >> >

[O] [PATCH] Org-Velocity rewrite

This is a rewrite of Org-Velocity for speed. Delays due to file size should no longer be perceptible. I have also added in-line previews of entry contents and dropped support for Org-Remember. Paul Rodriguez. diff --git a/contrib/lisp/org-velocity.el b/contrib/lisp/org-velocity.el index aae96b3.

Re: [O] [BUG] Inconsistency in src block hiding

Hello, Eric Schulte writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> It is inconsistent when keywords stack on top of each other. If you have >> only a "#+name:" keyword, block with fold at the "#+name:" level. If you >> have both "#+name:" and, for example "#+results" below, block will fold >> at the "#

Re: [O] HTML export and Zotero-friendly headers

> Yes, though it doesn't need to be only COinS. Zotero supports a number > of different formats, but COinS looks like it may be the easiest and the > most concise. > You're aware that bibliographies exported as HTML from Zotero already contain COinS?

[O] How to say "I did that yesterday?"

I often discover that I completed something a few days ago and I would like to mark it done with the appropriate date as though I had marked it done in the past. That means, e.g., for a repeating event it might repeat sooner than if it had been done today. Is there a way? -- Dave Abrahams Boos

Re: [O] How to say "I did that yesterday?"

On Tue, Nov 22 2011, Dave Abrahams wrote: > I often discover that I completed something a few days ago and I would > like to mark it done with the appropriate date as though I had marked it > done in the past. That means, e.g., for a repeating event it might > repeat sooner than if it had been do

Re: [O] Add publishing with utf8

I added this to my .emacs: (set-language-environment "UTF-8") (prefer-coding-system 'utf-8-unix) (org-export-html-coding-system 'utf-8-unix) but Emacs still opens files with pure ASCII as undecided-unix, thus producing wrong iso-8859-1 in my charsets again. I don't know what to do. Is there

[O] [bug] problem with odt export with latex \ref

Hello all, Herbert's recent posting of a link to a video showing off the ODT exporter, I decided it was time I finally tried this out. I can export a document with no errors but when I try to open the document in libreoffice, I get a dialog box with an error message: , | Read error. | Format

Re: [O] How to say "I did that yesterday?"

I often discover that I completed something a few days ago and I would like to mark it done with the appropriate date as though I had marked it done in the past. That means, e.g., for a repeating event it might repeat sooner than if it had been done today. Is there a way? I also want to

Re: [O] How to say "I did that yesterday?"

Hi Dave On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 20:40, Dave Abrahams wrote: > [...] for a repeating event it might > repeat sooner than if it had been done today. [...] Are you looking for habits? http://orgmode.org/manual/Tracking-your-habits.html#Tracking-your-habits Michael

Re: [O] HTML export and Zotero-friendly headers

Hi, Adam Smith, You're repeating my misunderstanding -- that's not what he's looking for, see the thread above. Christian On 11/22/11 7:35 PM, adam.smith wrote: Yes, though it doesn't need to be only COinS. Zotero supports a number of different formats, but COinS looks like it may be the

Re: [O] Add publishing with utf8

sindikat wrote: > I added this to my .emacs: > > (set-language-environment "UTF-8") > (prefer-coding-system 'utf-8-unix) > (org-export-html-coding-system 'utf-8-unix) > This last one is wrong: (setq org-export-html-coding-system 'utf-8-unix) might work better. This might be all you have t

Re: [O] Not overwriting unchanged source code files when tangling

On 11/19/2011 01:32 PM, Holger Hoefling wrote: Hi everyone, I wanted to thank everyone for their helpful suggestions and wanted to share the best solutions I heard of and found. One solution is to include a rule in the makefile for every sourcecode file that that copies it and only updates the

Re: [O] Add publishing with utf8

"sindikat" writes: > I added this to my .emacs: > > (set-language-environment "UTF-8") > (prefer-coding-system 'utf-8-unix) This is what I use. Even when I open a new file, the buffer coding system is chosen as utf-8-unix, shown as U: in the mode line. Maybe your environment is setup different

Re: [O] Not overwriting unchanged source code files when tangling

Allen S. Rout wrote: > On 11/19/2011 01:32 PM, Holger Hoefling wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I wanted to thank everyone for their helpful suggestions and wanted to > > share the best solutions I heard of and found. > > > > One solution is to include a rule in the makefile for every sourcecode >

[O] Updating Worg re standard source block syntax

Hi There are literally hundreds of uses of #+srcname and #+source within Worg - should I be updating these to #+name ? In other words, does Worg reflect the last official release (the Emacs release), or the bleeding edge (I tend to assume the latter because of the Org community spirit of Worg), bu

Re: [O] How to say "I did that yesterday?"

At Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:40:35 -0800, Dave Abrahams wrote: > > > I often discover that I completed something a few days ago and I would > like to mark it done with the appropriate date as though I had marked it > done in the past. That means, e.g., for a repeating event it might > repeat sooner th

Re: [O] Updating Worg re standard source block syntax

Martyn Jago wrote: > Hi > > There are literally hundreds of uses of #+srcname and #+source within > Worg - should I be updating these to #+name ? In other words, does Worg > reflect the last official release (the Emacs release), or the bleeding > edge (I tend to assume the latter because of the

Re: [O] [PATCH] Avoid lisp error with (org-deadline nil "+1d")

On 21.11.2011, at 23:39, Peter Münster wrote: > * lisp/org.el (parse-time-weekdays): Must not be void. > > TINYCHANGE > --- > lisp/org.el |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lisp/org.el b/lisp/org.el > index 253703b..41d418a 100644 > --- a/lisp/org.el >

Re: [O] How to say "I did that yesterday?"

on Tue Nov 22 2011, Michael Brand wrote: > Hi Dave > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 20:40, Dave Abrahams wrote: >> [...] for a repeating event it might >> repeat sooner than if it had been done today. [...] > > Are you looking for habits? > http://orgmode.org/manual/Tracking-your-habits.html#Trackin

[O] [OT] CSV to Org

I have an old CSV that looks like this. I'd like to convert it to Org format. I think I want to use properties for every field except Name (headline) and Note (body text with \r\n meaning newline). What is the best way to do this? "Na&me","&W","&H","A","B","N&et","&File","&Title","&Org","Addr&1

Re: [O] Updating Worg re standard source block syntax

Martyn Jago wrote: > There are literally hundreds of uses of #+srcname and #+source within > Worg - should I be updating these to #+name ? In other words, does Worg > reflect the last official release (the Emacs release), or the bleeding > edge (I tend to assume the latter because of the Org comm

Re: [O] [OT] CSV to Org

Samuel Wales wrote: > I have an old CSV that looks like this. I'd like to convert > it to Org format. > > I think I want to use properties for every field except Name > (headline) and Note (body text with \r\n meaning newline). > > What is the best way to do this? > > "Na&me","&W","&H","A","B

Re: [O] How to say "I did that yesterday?"

on Tue Nov 22 2011, Erik Hetzner wrote: > At Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:40:35 -0800, > Dave Abrahams wrote: >> > >> >> I often discover that I completed something a few days ago and I would >> like to mark it done with the appropriate date as though I had marked it >> done in the past. That means, e

Re: [O] [bug] problem with odt export with latex \ref

This should be fixed now. The problem was triggered because of inter-mixing label references and the italics style in the same line. > Hello all, > > Herbert's recent posting of a link to a video showing off the ODT > exporter, I decided it was time I finally tried this out. I can export > a do

Re: [O] [OT] CSV to Org

Hmm, thanks for your comments. I can see the appeal of a Python-ish solution, but I was thinking maybe some elisp (or even a package or a part of Org) instead. Then it could grow to a generally useful importer.

Re: [O] [OT] CSV to Org

Hi Nick, Thanks for your comments. I can see the appeal of an external tool, but I was thinking maybe some elisp (or even a package or a part of Org) could do it instead. Then it could maybe even grow to become a generally useful importer. I am useless at Python. Samuel

Re: [O] [BUG] Inconsistency in src block hiding

> > Consider the following cases: > > #+name: one-more > #+header: :var k=2 > #+begin_src emacs-lisp > (1+ k) > #+end_src > > #+header: :var k=2 > #+name: one-more > #+begin_src emacs-lisp > (1+ k) > #+end_src > > #+attr_html: :textarea t :height 10 :width 40 > #+name: unique-name > #+begin_example

[O] [PATCH] Bug: org-clock-out-if-current => "marker does not point anywhere" [7.7 (release_7.7.397.g5adafd)]

The following patch fixes the bug. --8<---cut here---start->8--- diff --git a/lisp/org-clock.el b/lisp/org-clock.el index e026d93..b47ac66 100644 --- a/lisp/org-clock.el +++ b/lisp/org-clock.el @@ -1697,6 +1697,7 @@ from the `before-change-functions' in the cur

[O] Bug: org-todo-yesterday doesn't work from agenda buffer [7.7 (release_7.7.548.g9a442.dirty)]

Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list.

Re: [O] How to say "I did that yesterday?"

on Tue Nov 22 2011, Erik Hetzner wrote: > At Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:40:35 -0800, > Dave Abrahams wrote: >> > >> >> I often discover that I completed something a few days ago and I would >> like to mark it done with the appropriate date as though I had marked it >> done in the past. That means, e

Re: [O] [OT] CSV to Org

Samuel Wales wrote: > Hmm, thanks for your comments. I can see the appeal of a Python-ish > solution, but I was thinking maybe some elisp (or even a package or a > part of Org) instead. Then it could grow to a generally useful > importer. > The trouble is that CSV is a very loosely defined fo

Re: [O] [PATCH] Avoid lisp error with (org-deadline nil "+1d")

On Tue, Nov 22 2011, Carsten Dominik wrote: > This is not allowed, we cannot define a variable defined in another package. Oh, pardon. > Can you send a backtrace of the error, please? Of course (from "emacs -Q"): --8<---cut here---start->8--- Debugger enter

Re: [O] [PATCH] Avoid lisp error with (org-deadline nil "+1d")

Fixed, thanks, please verify. - Carsten On 23.11.2011, at 07:14, Peter Münster wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22 2011, Carsten Dominik wrote: > >> This is not allowed, we cannot define a variable defined in another package. > > Oh, pardon. > > >> Can you send a backtrace of the error, please? > > Of

Re: [O] [BUG] org-table: time difference delivers wrong results

Anyone? It might be a duplicate of what Gustav Wiktröm reported on 1st of September, but his problem was not resolved, either. Daniel Am Dienstag 15. November 2011, 22:12:45 schrieb Daniel Bausch: > Hello list, > > consider the following example: > |A | B | C | > | > |-

Re: [O] How to say "I did that yesterday?"

On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:02:48 -0800, Dave Abrahams wrote: > > on Tue Nov 22 2011, Erik Hetzner wrote: > > > At Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:40:35 -0800, > > Dave Abrahams wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> I often discover that I completed something a few days ago and I would > >> like to mark it done with the