Re: [O] org--string-from-props

2018-10-26 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Colin Baxter writes: > I think there may be an issue with commit > b886ebbc8924916c1e36df00639b3208a1c155a2. Using tables, I now get an error: > > org--string-from-props: Un-handled `display' value: (space :width 1) > > which goes away when I revert the commit. Oops. Fixed. Thank you.

Re: [O] org-store/insert-link truncating the full subject of mails

2018-10-26 Thread Garreau, Alexandre
Le 26/10/2018 à 17h35, Nicolas Goaziou a écrit : > "Garreau, Alexandre" writes: >> Why so? > > See `org-email-link-description-format'. Thank you! >> It shouldn’t be this way by default. > > Truncating subject doesn't seem unreasonable to me. In any case, you can > just set the variable above

[O] agenda view help - viewing all time entries for a tag

2018-10-26 Thread Jeff Filipovits
Say I have a calendar file which is in the following format: * description of deadline:client1: DEADLINE: <2018-10-28 Tue> * a meeting :client1: <2018-11-1 Thu 10:00> I would like to be able to view all headlines and time entries associated with a particular tag, and to have that

Re: [O] Inline code block syntax highlighting absence

2018-10-26 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, stardiviner writes: > I did a search of "font-lock-add-keywords", "begin_src", "src_" etc in > Org Mode source code, but have not found exact place where fontify > function are. So I don't know where to modify the source code. Now I put > my current config here: [...] >

Re: [O] coderef does not provide file path for org-insert-link when not in original buffre

2018-10-26 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, stardiviner writes: > Thanks for this hint, I added a new entry in org-src--babel-info list to > pass the original parent file path. Thank you. Some comments follow. > - (language body arguments switches name start coderef)" > + (language body arguments switches name start coderef

Re: [O] org-store/insert-link truncating the full subject of mails

2018-10-26 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, "Garreau, Alexandre" writes: > Why so? See `org-email-link-description-format'. > It shouldn’t be this way by default. Truncating subject doesn't seem unreasonable to me. In any case, you can just set the variable above to suit your needs. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

[O] Bug? Group tags not working properly with agenda searches

2018-10-26 Thread Omari Norman
Hello, First of all, thank you for org-mode. Without it, I literally would find it much more difficult to do my job. I am having a problem with group tags. I reproduced it using the latest org-mode from the org package archive, 20181022. The minimal example is this: say I have a group tag

Re: [O] Inline code block syntax highlighting absence

2018-10-26 Thread stardiviner
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > stardiviner writes: > >> I did a search of "font-lock-add-keywords", "begin_src", "src_" etc in >> Org Mode source code, but have not found exact place where fontify >> function are. So I don't know where to modify the source code. Now I put >> my current

Re: [O] coderef does not provide file path for org-insert-link when not in original buffre

2018-10-26 Thread stardiviner
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > stardiviner writes: > >> Thanks for this hint, I added a new entry in org-src--babel-info list to >> pass the original parent file path. > > Thank you. Some comments follow. > >> - (language body arguments switches name start coderef)" >> + (language body

Re: [O] org-store/insert-link truncating the full subject of mails

2018-10-26 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
"Garreau, Alexandre" writes: > How’s that? I think limiting the number of characters in the description is to be on the safe side. 30 characters are usually enough to understand what the mail is about. > it just feels wrong: if it’s to long, users can truncate themselves, > it’s

Re: [O] org-store/insert-link truncating the full subject of mails

2018-10-26 Thread Amin Bandali
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > I think limiting the number of characters in the description is to be on > the safe side. 30 characters are usually enough to understand what the > mail is about. Can you please elaborate on what you mean by being on the safe side in this context? What problems could

Re: [O] *markup*, /markup/ and _markup_ true semantics [Was: Re: Ox-html: Replace with and with ]

2018-10-26 Thread Tim Cross
Garreau, Alexandre writes: > Sorry, just found out that interesting (to me) thread I shouldn’t have > let go: > > On 2018-10-25 at 08:00, Tim Cross wrote: >> Kaushal Modi writes: >>> […] >>> - b and i are not deprecated >>> - b and strong are both valid but their use depends on the writer's

Re: [O] electric-pair, autopair, smartparens, etc in org-mode

2018-10-26 Thread Tim Cross
Samuel Wales writes: > can either of you give examples of code or settings that you had that > made behavior of new modes unpredictable because emacs started > supporting the behavior you made the code or settings for? > It is difficult to remember now as it was some time ago that I cleaned

[O] C-c C-c in src block interpret line as table

2018-10-26 Thread Garreau, Alexandre
I tried to eval the following block, and my point was on the last line, of course, but since it begins with a “|”, it was interpreted as a table, and block was not evaled: I believe this is a bug. Why would a org table be inside a non-org source block? it’s not even inside a comment! #+BEGIN_SRC

[O] org--string-from-props

2018-10-26 Thread Colin Baxter
I think there may be an issue with commit b886ebbc8924916c1e36df00639b3208a1c155a2. Using tables, I now get an error: org--string-from-props: Un-handled `display' value: (space :width 1) which goes away when I revert the commit. Best wishes,

Re: [O] electric-pair, autopair, smartparens, etc in org-mode

2018-10-26 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Thursday, 25 Oct 2018 at 15:57, Samuel Wales wrote: > can either of you give examples of code or settings that you had that > made behavior of new modes unpredictable because emacs started > supporting the behavior you made the code or settings for? In my case, mostly incompatible bindings of

Re: [O] C-c C-c in src block interpret line as table

2018-10-26 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Friday, 26 Oct 2018 at 08:45, Garreau, Alexandre wrote: > I tried to eval the following block, and my point was on the last line, > of course, but since it begins with a “|”, it was interpreted as a > table, and block was not evaled: I believe this is a bug. Why would a > org table be inside a

Re: [O] C-c C-c in src block interpret line as table

2018-10-26 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, "Garreau, Alexandre" writes: > I tried to eval the following block, and my point was on the last line, > of course, but since it begins with a “|”, it was interpreted as a > table, and block was not evaled: I believe this is a bug. Why would a > org table be inside a non-org source

Re: [O] C-c C-c in src block interpret line as table

2018-10-26 Thread Garreau, Alexandre
On 2018/10/26 at 11:34, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > "Garreau, Alexandre" writes: > >> I tried to eval the following block, and my point was on the last line, >> of course, but since it begins with a “|”, it was interpreted as a >> table, and block was not evaled: I believe this is a bug. Why would

Re: [O] C-c C-c in src block interpret line as table

2018-10-26 Thread Garreau, Alexandre
On 2018/10/26 at 10:29, Eric S Fraga wrote: > On Friday, 26 Oct 2018 at 08:45, Garreau, Alexandre wrote: >> I tried to eval the following block, and my point was on the last line, >> of course, but since it begins with a “|”, it was interpreted as a >> table, and block was not evaled: I believe