Fwd: Re: how to renumber footnotes?

Accidentally sent this message off-list. Trying again: On Fri, Apr 17 2020, Sharon Kimble wrote: org-footnote can't tell that footnote 1 ([fn:1]) at the beginning is in the right place when confronted with footnote 1 ([fn:1]) half-way through! No, obviously, so you'll have to renumber the

Re: wip-cite status question and feedback

But ... On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 9:17 AM Bruce D'Arcus wrote: ... > I can't see that it's necessary to have a fourth, because I think the > result of that would be this, which doesn't make any sense. > > 4. "Doe blah blah {2017}"/"Doe blah blah {[3]}" -> > author-in-text+suppress-author

Re: wip-cite status question and feedback

Just one question, Richard ... On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 5:50 AM Richard Lawrence wrote: [...] > I think it is worth pointing out to Bib(La)TeX users that it is useful > to avoid a proliferation of citation commands in Org syntax. The syntax > discussed so far achieves this by "factoring out"

Re: [PATCH] Add support for trace and error output streams in Common Lisp

To test the feature, please - git clone https://gitlab.com/akater/org-mode.git - checkout ob-lisp-traces-and-errors - load lisp/ob-lisp.el and lisp/ob-core.el in a running Emacs - M-: (defalias 'org-babel-execute:lisp 'org-babel-execute:lisp--multiple-targets-support) RET and also - git clone

Re: adding paragraph folding to visibility cycling?

Hi Nicolas, On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 4:03 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Hello, > > "Bruce D'Arcus" writes: > > > One feature I have always found helpful when working on long documents > > is paragraph folding; where paragraphs are folded to display just the > > first line. > > [...] > > > I can

Re: Bug: org-table-insert-column edits formulas wrongly [9.3 (release_9.3 @ /usr/local/Cellar/emacs-plus/HEAD-9d38564/share/emacs/28.0.50/lisp/org/)]

On Saturday, 18 Apr 2020 at 00:51, Marco Wahl wrote: > Okay, pushed. Thank you! Seems to work very well. Now, I might be pushing my luck so apologies but: it would be nice if the kill row/column behaviour were also consistent. Right now, if you kill a row, it leaves point where it was; if you

Re: $LR in Table Formula

Ignore my previous email/post. I was obviously under the influence. I see the LR references in the code. -- : Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.3.6-492-gc990d4

Re: $LR in Table Formula

On Saturday, 18 Apr 2020 at 01:31, Marco Wahl wrote: > Hi! > > By accident at browsing the code I stumbled over "$LR" in column > formulas. TBH I don't understand "$LR" and I haven't found a bit about > it in the documentation. > > What is the meaning of $LR? Where in the code did you find this?

Re: wip-cite status question and feedback

Hi Bruce and all, "Bruce D'Arcus" writes: > Just to align what you're saying and what I'm saying: > > I see three commands in the pandoc syntax: standard/parenthetical, > author-in-text, and suppress-author; that look like so: > > [@doe17] > @doe17 > -@doe17 > > Implicit in what you wrote is

Re: wip-cite status question and feedback

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 8:48 AM Richard Lawrence wrote: > > Hi Bruce and all, > > "Bruce D'Arcus" writes: > > > Just to align what you're saying and what I'm saying: > > > > I see three commands in the pandoc syntax: standard/parenthetical, > > author-in-text, and suppress-author; that look like

Re: Inconsistent use of \ref and \eqref in ox-latex and ox-html

Hello, Brian Powell writes: > The issue is that when exporting equation numbers with ox-html, it uses > MathJax's \eqref that wraps the equation in parentheses, for example: > > "Refer to (3) for more." > > However, when exporting the same document with ox-latex, it uses Latex's \ref > that

Re: adding paragraph folding to visibility cycling?

Hello, "Bruce D'Arcus" writes: > One feature I have always found helpful when working on long documents > is paragraph folding; where paragraphs are folded to display just the > first line. [...] > I can get paragraph folding and unfolding in org using packages like > origami (say with

Re: wip-cite status question and feedback

Joost Kremers writes: > Good points. I guess what this boils down to is whether Org wants > to be like LaTeX, where simple things are doable and complicated > things possible, or Pandoc, where simple things are simple indeed > and complicated things essentially impossible. > > To clarify: in

Bug: org-publish-sitemap messes absolute sitemap paths [9.3.6 (9.3.6-25-g685b2c-elpa @ c:/Users/juanj/OneDrive/Library/Emacs/elpa-26/org-20200316/)]

Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.

Re: wip-cite status question and feedback

Hi all, Nice to see this issue being discussed again! I don't have a lot to add and at the moment I don't have a lot of time to contribute, but I wanted to make one point about this issue: Joost Kremers writes: > On Mon, Apr 13 2020, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> denis.maier.li...@mailbox.org

Re: [SOLVED] Re: [PATCH] Show hidden drawers when org-cycle on headlines

Hello, stardiviner writes: > This sounds reasonable. (I deleted my patch on my local fork, I think your > solution is better.) I pushed the changes. Now drawers folding is on par with blocks. You can hide or show a drawer with `org-hide-drawer-toggle', which is similar to

Re: $LR in Table Formula

This was an old way to refer to fields in the last row. It was already deprecated in 2011. I also does not seem to work anymore. I had forgotten all about it and only found it back with git log -S \$LR --source --all | less which pointed me to commit 8237c9ae6d587a22646333e0315683675e2db538

Re: Overleaf equivalent for org-babel users?

I've looked a bit more into what Joseph linked to. What about using Org locally on your computer, and sharing an http://markup.rocks + DropBox access to your Org files for non-emacs collaborators? If CoCalc provides something you need that you don't have locally, you could combine CoCalc +

Re: Bug: org-table-insert-column edits formulas wrongly [9.3 (release_9.3 @ /usr/local/Cellar/emacs-plus/HEAD-9d38564/share/emacs/28.0.50/lisp/org/)]

Hi, And thanks, Eric! Eric S Fraga writes: > Now, I might be pushing my luck so apologies but: it would be nice if > the kill row/column behaviour were also consistent. Right now, if you > kill a row, it leaves point where it was; if you kill a column, it moves > point to the previous column.

Re: Fwd: Re: how to renumber footnotes?

Joost Kremers writes: > Accidentally sent this message off-list. Trying again: Hmm I didn't find any of the six messages in the References: header when I searched . I see the same messages missing in the thread displayed at

Re: Overleaf equivalent for org-babel users?

Hi Dr. May, Unfortunately I have not found Emacs + Org to be the right tools when collaborating. What we need is a way for Org wrap/interface/edit Jupyter Notebooks, since that seems to be becoming the standard. Unfortunately. I have had some luck with a hybrid approach using the Sage Notebook

Re: Overleaf equivalent for org-babel users?

Dear Ken, thank you very much. I'm looking into cocalc now. I already got it to compile some test.org file as pdf. I also set up a test file there in order to start finding out how to do this. Next step, I guess, would be to see, if org-babel works. Unfortunately, it looks like a bit more work

Re: Bug: org-publish-sitemap messes absolute sitemap paths [9.3.6 (9.3.6-25-g685b2c-elpa @ c:/Users/juanj/OneDrive/Library/Emacs/elpa-26/org-20200316/)]

Hello, > The line > > (sitemap-filename (concat root (or sitemap-filename "sitemap.org"))) > > in ox-publish.el prevents the user from using an absolute path for the > location of the sitemap. This is also not very good practice, because > concatenation does not guarantee good pathnames.

Re: wip-cite status question and feedback

> Bruce D'Arcus hat am 18. April 2020 15:22 geschrieben: > > > But ... > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 9:17 AM Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > > ... > > > I can't see that it's necessary to have a fourth, because I think the > > result of that would be this, which doesn't make any sense. > > > > 4.

Re: wip-cite status question and feedback

On Sat, Apr 18 2020, Bruce D'Arcus wrote: The question, then: Is that what you're saying; we don't need suppress-author? I think I actually agree, though will add a topic that came up in the CSL implementation discussion for the author-in-text styles in the past few days. Here's a common

Re: $LR in Table Formula

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 10:33 PM Marco Wahl wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > > > This was an old way to refer to fields in the last row. It was already > > deprecated in 2011. I also does not seem to work anymore. > > > > I had forgotten all about it and only found it back with > > > > git

Re: wip-cite status question and feedback

> Bruce D'Arcus hat am 18. April 2020 15:22 geschrieben: > > > But ... > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 9:17 AM Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > > ... > > > I can't see that it's necessary to have a fourth, because I think the > > result of that would be this, which doesn't make any sense. > > > > 4.

Re: $LR in Table Formula

Carsten Dominik writes: > This was an old way to refer to fields in the last row. It was already > deprecated in 2011. I also does not seem to work anymore. > > I had forgotten all about it and only found it back with > > git log -S \$LR --source --all | less > > which pointed me to commit