Re: [PATCH] Include support for evaluating julia code

2021-09-24 Thread Pedro Bruel
Hi Timothy, Thanks for the reply! I am submitting a modded version the of the original ob-julia.el, where I had fixed the bugs I encountered and updated the interface with org-mode. I've been using the version on https://github.com/phrb/ob-julia for a while now, mainly to write programming

[PATCH] Include support for evaluating julia code

2021-09-24 Thread Pedro Bruel
Hi, This patch includes ob-julia.el from org-contrib, and a tentative test-ob-julia.el test file. This is my first attempt at a patch, so please let me know if there's anything wrong! Thanks, Pedro From c002f541cad175573b102720e3880ba98d05bf67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pedro Bruel Date:

Re: [PATCH] Include support for evaluating julia code

2021-09-24 Thread Timothy
Hi Pedro, Thanks for your patch, it’s great to see the interest in Julia support and it’s something that I absolutely think should be in org-core . However, ob-julia.el was moved into org-contrib because it was not well maintained, and very buggy. I’m actually currently working on a successor

Re: S-M-{,} on CLOCK timestamp

2021-09-24 Thread Tim Cross
Timothy writes: > Hi Tim, > > Jorge P. de Morais Neto writes: > >> I am sorry, my description of the initial condition was incomplete. To >> reproduce the problem, you cannot simply copy the provided text to an >> Org buffer. You should create the clock timestamps with actual clocking >>

Bug: org-element-map doesn't consider all links in the current buffer [9.4.4 (release_9.4.4 @ /usr/share/emacs/27.2/lisp/org/)]

2021-09-24 Thread Rodrigo Morales
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See https://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback Your bug report will be posted to the Org mailing list.

Re: [PATCH] Include support for evaluating julia code

2021-09-24 Thread Greg Minshall
Timothy, Pedro, would it make sense to consider Pedro's patch as being against the one in org-contrib? (i'm not sure how such patches work.) cheers, Greg

Bug: Indenting empty description list item leaves point at beginning of line [9.4.4]

2021-09-24 Thread Bodertz
See this example plain list, where point is represented by : - list item - Indent the empty list item below by pressing M- - After pressing M- as asked, the list will look like this: - list item - Indent the empty list item below by pressing M- - As you can see, point is after the

[Q] Is there a convention for the formatting of messages in this mailing list?

2021-09-24 Thread Rodrigo Morales
Let's suppose I want to create a thread in the mailing list that contains different sections, code blocks and some quotes. I used to use Org Mode for the format in my messages, but I just read a discussion where someone mentioned that getting the Org Mode and Org Babel syntax in the mailing list

Re: [Q] Is there a convention for the formatting of messages in this mailing list?

2021-09-24 Thread Jonathan McHugh
Hi Rodrigo September 25, 2021 1:34 AM, "Rodrigo Morales" wrote: > Let's suppose I want to create a thread in the mailing list that > contains different sections, code blocks and some quotes. I used to use > Org Mode for the format in my messages, but I just read a discussion > where someone

Re: [PATCH] Fix some typos

2021-09-24 Thread Loris Bennett
Max Nikulin writes: > On 23/09/2021 03:18, Juan Manuel Macías wrote: >> Max Nikulin writes: >> >>> However there is namely "memory" in the "1609 Quarto", see e.g. >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonnet_1 Web pages with the same variant >>> as in the Org manual do not mention the source

Re: Switching to new Git repositories

2021-09-24 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Thursday, 23 Sep 2021 at 14:06, William Denton wrote: > Error (use-package): org/:catch: Invalid version syntax: ‘9.5-dev’ Minor aside: this version number causes problems with org-caldav-sync as well. It doesn't enable "(version< ...)" and related to work properly. -- : Eric S Fraga via

Re: [Worg] Proposing a few CSS changes

2021-09-24 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Thursday, 23 Sep 2021 at 21:37, Adam Porter wrote: > The changes are simply removing some rules, which allows the user's > configured browser font settings to be applied, as well as setting the > max-width of the content to 60em. I fully support this. Specifying font sizes is never a good

Re: [PATCH] Fix some typos

2021-09-24 Thread Juan Manuel Macías
I attach a patch with Shakespeare's sonnet completely fixed: the poem is replaced by the version included in Wikipedia (Shakespeare, William. Duncan-Jones, Katherine. Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Bloomsbury Arden 2010. p. 113). I also removed a spurious phrase that I put in that patch (Org-News). Best