Robert Nikander writes:
> I see why this is not possible, given the text format of an org file. But I
> am curious if people think it would be useful. This is a bit off-topic maybe,
> but I’m imagining what I would do if I created something like org-mode using
> another underlying format.
>
more below.
On 12/20/21, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Thanks for reporting!
>
> I just pushed the fix upstream.
thank you.
fyi, i am still trying to get main to work. there is bug in most
recent main where org element use cache being set to t makes loading
infinite. and another where c-x c-c is
===
Hmm... I myself went through several refactors of my Org file
structures. Exactly because things become unmaintainable over time. It
is hard to design a good structure without enough experience with the
old one.
===
[my forest structure is actually pretty good. it is partly that i
ahve more
this reproduces most or all of the time. idk if it is ueful to
anybody, but i thought i would post it in case it is instantly
recognizable.
emacs 25. latest 9.5 org main.
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (quit)
read(#)
org-persist-read(org-element--cache #)
org-mode()
Rudolf Adamkovič writes:
>> So, Org cannot distinguish between language backends that are simply
>> not loaded and the ones that do not define org-babel-execute:lang.
>
> Oh, if we have this architectural limitation in place, then Org cannot
> help the user, and every user will have "explain" to
You can also use drawers (as an alternative to inline tasks) for
collapsible content.
Another potential is to use blocks. You can define your own kind of blocks,
or even just use an org block and it is collapsible.
John
---
Professor John Kitchin (he/him/his)
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> So, Org cannot distinguish between language backends that are simply
> not loaded and the ones that do not define org-babel-execute:lang.
Oh, if we have this architectural limitation in place, then Org cannot
help the user, and every user will have "explain" to Org that
Robert Nikander writes:
> If you view a "*" item as "book section", it's confusing. But if you
> view a "*" item as "collapsible thing", then it makes more sense.
I understand your use case. But I think in that context Org headings
would still be useful (at least they remind us at what level
Bruno Barbier [2021-12-21 Tue 20:35] wrote:
> The following works for me, in an org mode buffer:
>
> ,
> | (font-lock-add-keywords nil '(("books" . 'org-level-4)) t)
> `
> No need to call font-lock-update or restart: any new or modified text
> gets the new fontification.
Thanks, it
I see why this is not possible, given the text format of an org file. But I am
curious if people think it would be useful. This is a bit off-topic maybe, but
I’m imagining what I would do if I created something like org-mode using
another underlying format.
Example:
* Top
Some text under
On 23/12/2021 23:11, Robert Nikander wrote:
I see why this is not possible, given the text format of an org file.
But I am curious if people think it would be useful. This is a bit
off-topic maybe, but I’m imagining what I would do if I created
something like org-mode using another underlying
What do you think about using context's structurelevels instead? That
would allow users to define their own mappings.
Denis
Am 23.12.2021 um 08:24 schrieb juh:
Am Mittwoch, dem 22.12.2021 um 10:37 -0800 schrieb Jason Ross:
Thank you for bringing this up. I'd like to discuss this a bit with
Hi Robert,
Robert Nikander writes:
> I see why this is not possible, given the text format of an org file.
> But I am curious if people think it would be useful. This is a bit
> off-topic maybe, but I’m imagining what I would do if I created
> something like org-mode using another underlying
Felipe Lema writes:
> I'd say that geiser transforms Emacs into a full blown IDE: code
> completion, documentation, symbol/tag search... you name it. This also
> applies to Org when you edit the source code using C-c C-c, so that
> helps a ton with learning the language.
That sounds fantastic!
Max Nikulin wrote:
> Have you seen the following and links therein?
> https://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#closing-outline-sections
No, I hadn't found that. Thanks. Those links answer my question.
Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
> It is an interesting question; however, I would say that this is not a
15 matches
Mail list logo
