Re: [O] [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class

Hi, On 24 September 2015 at 12:04, Eric S Fraga wrote: > I have done the following: > […] thanks for all the great suggestions! I haven't had the opportunity to try out all proposed solutions yet, but Eric's snippet looks like a great way to tackle my initial problem. Best,

Re: [O] [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class

On Wednesday, 23 Sep 2015 at 14:27, Ista Zahn wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote: [...] >> One solution, but not an ideal one, is to use file local variables to >> define org-latex-classes (and any other variables) as appropriate for >> the document.

Re: [O] [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class

Hi Nicolas, On 21 September 2015 at 21:46, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > But can't users needing a non-default class customize their > own `org-latex-classes? Or is there an entitling reason to offer it out > of the box? you are of course right; users can always customise

Re: [O] [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class

Aloha Sebastian, Sebastian Boehm writes: > Hi Nicolas, > > On 21 September 2015 at 21:46, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> But can't users needing a non-default class customize their >> own `org-latex-classes? Or is there an entitling reason to

Re: [O] [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote: > On Wednesday, 23 Sep 2015 at 18:59, Sebastian Boehm wrote: >> Hi Nicolas, >> >> On 21 September 2015 at 21:46, Nicolas Goaziou >> wrote: >>> But can't users needing a non-default class customize

Re: [O] [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class

Hi Eric, Eric S Fraga writes: > One solution, but not an ideal one, is to use file local variables to > define org-latex-classes (and any other variables) as appropriate for > the document. It's not ideal because unfortunately most of org's > variables (as well as many of

Re: [O] [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class

On Wednesday, 23 Sep 2015 at 18:59, Sebastian Boehm wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > On 21 September 2015 at 21:46, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> But can't users needing a non-default class customize their >> own `org-latex-classes? Or is there an entitling reason to offer it out >>

Re: [O] [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Rasmus writes: > >> The long-term solution to this is a new "bundled org" file format >> containing dependencies, such as org files, init.el etc. >> >>

Re: [O] [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class

Hello, Rasmus writes: > The long-term solution to this is a new "bundled org" file format > containing dependencies, such as org files, init.el etc. > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2015-02/msg00765.html This was just an idea, not a long-term solution or

Re: [O] [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class

Sebastian Boehm writes: > My intention was not to start a debate on "article" vs. "scrartcl", > but it would be great to see some more variety in the default document > classes or maybe even a way to specify the desired document class as > well as the desired

Re: [O] [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class

Eric S Fraga writes: >> Some people might hate the margin choices to the extend that they'd >> need geometry to make KOMA-script bearable. Now we have two new >> dependencies... > > yes. The real question is not the dependencies but what would we like > new users to when

Re: [O] [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class

On Tuesday, 22 Sep 2015 at 13:21, Rasmus wrote: > Key word being 'arguably'. indeed! > Some people might hate the margin choices to the extend that they'd > need geometry to make KOMA-script bearable. Now we have two new > dependencies... yes. The real question is not the dependencies but

Re: [O] [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class

On Monday, 21 Sep 2015 at 21:46, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: [...] > Thank you. But can't users needing a non-default class customize their > own `org-latex-classes? Or is there an entitling reason to offer it out > of the box? Only that the koma-script classes are arguably better defaults than the

Re: [O] [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class

Eric S Fraga writes: >> Thank you. But can't users needing a non-default class customize their >> own `org-latex-classes? Or is there an entitling reason to offer it out >> of the box? > > Only that the koma-script classes are arguably better defaults than the > actual

Re: [O] [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class

On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote: > On Monday, 21 Sep 2015 at 21:46, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Only that the koma-script classes are arguably better defaults than the > actual defaults... Personally, I cannot see any reason to use the > standard

Re: [O] [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:45:08PM +0200, Rasmus wrote: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > > > Sebastian Boehm writes: > > > >> I would like to propose adding the KOMA-script scrartcl class to the > >> list of supported ox-latex classes. scrartcl is

Re: [O] [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class

Hello, Sebastian Boehm writes: > I would like to propose adding the KOMA-script scrartcl class to the > list of supported ox-latex classes. scrartcl is one of the most > popular "article" alternatives out there and it would be great to be > able to pass org files

Re: [O] [PATCH] ox-latex: Add scrartcl LaTeX class

Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Sebastian Boehm writes: > >> I would like to propose adding the KOMA-script scrartcl class to the >> list of supported ox-latex classes. scrartcl is one of the most >> popular "article" alternatives out