On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 02:38:42PM -0400, Nick Dokos wrote:
The wasysym docs say that there should be no conflict, but that seems
to be wrong: ISTR multiple instances of this conflict.
If you prefer the amsmath integral signs over the wasysym ones, then
probably the best thing to do is to
Hi,
I tracked down an error about \iint already being defined to a clash
between wasysym and amsmath. I brought in amsmath, but it appears that
wasysym is an Org LaTeX export default package.
Just put this in the LaTeX header before you load amsmath:
\usepackage{savesym}
\savesymbol{iint}
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Vincent Beffara vbeff...@ens-lyon.fr wrote:
Hi,
I tracked down an error about \iint already being defined to a clash
between wasysym and amsmath. I brought in amsmath, but it appears that
wasysym is an Org LaTeX export default package.
Just put this in the
Dnia 2013-05-24, o godz. 12:35:59
John Hendy jw.he...@gmail.com napisał(a):
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Vincent Beffara
vbeff...@ens-lyon.fr wrote:
Hi,
I tracked down an error about \iint already being defined to a
clash between wasysym and amsmath. I brought in amsmath, but it
John Hendy jw.he...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Vincent Beffara vbeff...@ens-lyon.fr
wrote:
Hi,
I tracked down an error about \iint already being defined to a clash
between wasysym and amsmath. I brought in amsmath, but it appears that
wasysym is an Org LaTeX
Dnia 2013-05-24, o godz. 14:38:42
Nick Dokos ndo...@gmail.com napisał(a):
John Hendy jw.he...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Vincent Beffara
vbeff...@ens-lyon.fr wrote:
Hi,
I tracked down an error about \iint already being defined to a
clash between wasysym
Hello,
Marcin Borkowski mb...@wmi.amu.edu.pl writes:
Also, taking into account the number of problems with wasysym's
conflicts, I'd suggest dropping it (and maybe several other packages)
from it.
That would break, among other things, previewing of LaTeX snippets. On
the other hand, it's
