On 5/10/11 May 10 -12:25 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info writes:
On 5/9/11 May 9 -11:22 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
On 5/9/11 May 9 -9:54 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
There is the following
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info writes:
On 5/10/11 May 10 -12:25 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info writes:
On 5/9/11 May 9 -11:22 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
On 5/9/11 May 9 -9:54 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
Robert Goldman
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
There is the following code block there:
#+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent
(add-to-list 'org-export-latex-classes
'(per-file-class
\\documentclass{scrartcl}
[NO-DEFAULT-PACKAGES]
[EXTRA]
On 5/9/11 May 9 -11:22 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
On 5/9/11 May 9 -9:54 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
There is the following code block there:
#+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent
(add-to-list
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
Ah. I get it now. But then surely the above IS a bug -- presumably
it's not usual for a person to wish their latex export configuration to
appear, in verbatim block, in their org-generated latex document!
Perhaps not in most cases, but a tutorial
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info writes:
On 5/9/11 May 9 -11:22 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
On 5/9/11 May 9 -9:54 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
There is the following code block there:
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
Ah. I get it now. But then surely the above IS a bug -- presumably
it's not usual for a person to wish their latex export configuration to
appear, in verbatim block, in their org-generated latex document!
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info writes:
On 4/29/11 Apr 29 -1:21 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
[...]
amsmath conflicts with wasysym (redefines \iint), so you have to
redefine your headers to omit wasysym or include amsmath *first*: for
some reason, if you \usepackage{amsmath} *before* you
Aloha Robert,
Yep. It should be One of these, amssymb, requires amsmath, which
conflicts with several LaTeX fonts.
Thanks for pointing this out.
All the best,
Tom
On Apr 29, 2011, at 6:26 AM, Robert Goldman wrote:
The document http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-latex-export.html
On 4/29/11 Apr 29 -11:44 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
Aloha Robert,
Yep. It should be One of these, amssymb, requires amsmath, which
conflicts with several LaTeX fonts.
I don't /believe/ amssymb requires amsmath. I have been working on a
document where I wanted to use some of the stuff in
Aloha Robert,
You're right again. Sorry for the noise. The amssymb package is the
source of the font conflicts.
Thanks for pointing this out.
I don't use amsmath, so can't help with your queries. When you've
sorted them out, please consider adding the solution to the LaTeX
export
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
On 4/29/11 Apr 29 -11:44 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
Aloha Robert,
Yep. It should be One of these, amssymb, requires amsmath, which
conflicts with several LaTeX fonts.
I don't /believe/ amssymb requires amsmath. I have been working on a
On 4/29/11 Apr 29 -1:21 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
On 4/29/11 Apr 29 -11:44 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
Aloha Robert,
Yep. It should be One of these, amssymb, requires amsmath, which
conflicts with several LaTeX fonts.
I don't /believe/ amssymb requires
13 matches
Mail list logo
