Hi Bastien,
I'm late to this party I know, but wanted to confirm all is working well for me
too.
Best regards,
Stacey
On 20 May 2014, at 15:11, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi Michael,
Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com writes:
For me it would be already enough and preferred when
Hi Bastien
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote:
Yes. There is also `thing-at-point' which does not recognize 1.1 as a
number... I circumvented this by using `calc-eval'. The above should
now work correctly.
Yes it does. Using Calc is a nice solution, thank you.
I
Hi Michael,
Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com writes:
I did not notice before but the first commit
7ac468ff5547891503b6b8f5fa03793d79b3bff6
changed SHIFT-RET on the empty field
| 2 |
| 5 |
| |
to add a new row instead of only replacing the current field.
This is now
Hi Bastien
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote:
Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com writes:
I did not notice before but the first commit
7ac468ff5547891503b6b8f5fa03793d79b3bff6
changed SHIFT-RET on the empty field
| 2 |
| 5 |
| |
to add a new
Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com writes:
I get a setq: Wrong type argument: stringp with SHIFT-RET in the empty
field of
| 2 |
| |
and
| [2014-04-30 Wed] |
| |
and
| 1.1 |
| |
Er, fixed, thanks!
--
Bastien
Hi Bastien
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote:
Er, fixed, thanks!
I tried some (3 * 2 * 2) variants and all work, thank you.
Michael
Hi Michael,
Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com writes:
For me it would be already enough and preferred when the increment
would be the same as in the two fields above point.
I pushed a change in master for this -- can you please check it works
as expected for you?
Thanks for this
Hi Bastien
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote:
Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com writes:
For me it would be already enough and preferred when the increment
would be the same as in the two fields above point.
I pushed a change in master for this --
Thank you
Hi Michael,
Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com writes:
As I see only now the use case
| 1.1 |
| -0.5 |
does not seem easy to increment by -1.6 due to the formatting of the
result, so I don't expect it to be implemented. (number-to-string is
not enough because of the
Hi Bastien
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote:
The idea came up earlier on to let org-table-copy-down increment by
using a table formula -- which is my TODO list for Org 8.3. I'll let
the list know when it's ready, but I think it would be a useful
feature.
For me it
Hi Stacey,
Stacey Marshall stacey.marsh...@oracle.com writes:
I am not a member of this list... I discovered it via
http://orgmode.org/org.html#Feedback, a link to the list there would
be helpful.
I added a link to the manual, thanks.
I discovered org-table-copy-down and its ability to
11 matches
Mail list logo
