> There is nothing to obsolete.
> ox-ascii did not process alphabetical lists in any way, which was a bug.
OK, thanks for verification.
Stace
On Sat, 6 Apr 2024 at 13:02, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Stacey Marshall writes:
>
> > Was the intention with this change to remove alphabetical lists
Stacey Marshall writes:
> Was the intention with this change to remove alphabetical lists from
> text (ascii) exporter?
The intention was to make ascii exporter aware about alphabetical lists
instead of behaving in undefined way.
> ...
> a. Point A
> b. Point B
> c. Point C
> d. [@z] Point Z
>
Regarding
https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/36a62fbf-6484-456f-9537-a7aa40530...@app.fastmail.com/
Was the intention with this change to remove alphabetical lists from
text (ascii) exporter?
#+begin_src
,#+title: Test document
,#+options: toc:nil author:nil
,* test of alphabetical export
"Tom Alexander" writes:
> Idk if its been discussed, but personally if I were given dictatorship over
> org-mode I would take all of these emacs variables that are defined outside
> of the document, and instead of having them influence org-mode directly, I
> would *only* use them to
Thanks!
> We aim to reduce config-dependent Org syntax in the long term.
Thats wonderful news! Sometimes this stuff can really surprise you. For
example, the structure of the document created by running `echo "1. foo\n
1.bar\n1.baz\n\t1.lorem"` changes based on the user's
"Tom Alexander" writes:
> It seems that COUNTER-SET[1] is not being honored when exporting to utf-8 for
> alphabetical lists even though it is honored for numeric lists. When
> exporting to html, COUNTER-SET is honored for both.
>
> Test document:
> ```
> # An ordered list starting at 3
> 1.
