On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 02:20:08AM +0800, TEC wrote:
> > Does Worg's landing page updates need to be addressed before we link
> > to it in the header?
>
> I'd like to see it get a little attention along those lines before hand,
> yes :)
Then I defer to your expertise! Though I can help organize
Russell Adams writes:
>> I do see your point. I think in order to warrant being presented as a
>> one-step-from-the-homepage target it would be good to tidy up the Worg
>> homepage.
>
> That's a valid criticism. Worg's main page could use an update to look
> more like the main site.
>
> Does
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:29:06AM +0800, TEC wrote:
>
> > However Worg is a key component because it's community maintained
> > documentation. Not just anyone can upload to the main site, but Worg
> > is as "wiki" as we have. As an integral part of the community
> > supported documentation I
Russell Adams writes:
> One could argue that "Releases", "Updates", and "Install" should be
> merged into a common download link. They all are the same thing. ;]
Hmmm. "Updates" seems like a bit of a special thing, but perhaps some
merging could happen sensibly. If that could be worked out,
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:37:09PM +0800, TEC wrote:
> Hi Russel, while I appreciate the significance of Worg, I currently
> don't feel that adding it to the header improves the site.
>
> There are two concerns I have on this.
>
> 1. I'm very wary of "header creep", see https://0x0.st/iFS7.png for
Eric S Fraga writes:
> Conclusion is that there is no conclusion.
Sounds about right .
Thanks for the link Eric.
--
Timothy
On Monday, 14 Dec 2020 at 23:37, TEC wrote:
> 1. I'm very wary of "header creep", see
Interesting article, albeit a little old maybe, here:
https://www.humanfactors.com/newsletters/breadth_vs_depth_we_revisit_this_question.asp
Conclusion is that there is no conclusion.
--
: Eric S Fraga via
Bastien writes:
> FWIW, I just slightly updated this page with this paragraph:
>
> If you are not a subscriber to the list, you can still send an email
> to emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, we will add you to the whitelist of people
> who can reach the list.
>> As a second request, can we get a link
Hi Russell,
Russell Adams writes:
> This really needs to state that the Org-mode mailing list is
> subscriber only. Membership is open, but that users should subscribe
> prior to posting. The Worg page for the ML says that.
FWIW, I just slightly updated this page with this paragraph:
If you
Here is a patch that might serve for the purpose. Best,
Tom
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:47 AM Russell Adams wrote:
>
> https://orgmode.org/community.html
>
> This really needs to state that the Org-mode mailing list is
> subscriber only. Membership is open, but that users should subscribe
> prior
10 matches
Mail list logo
