If people have doubts that changing that syntax table is generally
correct, what about the previous patch that alters just the
particular function?
___
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If people have doubts that changing that syntax table is generally
correct, what about the previous patch that alters just the
particular function?
At the moment, I don't have a time to study the code and his
patch. So,
think it needs time to be tested widely. I'm not well informed
about RFC2822 and what mail-extr.el does (especially the voodoo
operation, which is disabled by default for Japanese names), too.
RFC2822 only talks about the transmission-format, which is made of bytes,
not chars. It's probably
From textmodes/sgml-mode.el:
If you like upcased tags, put (setq sgml-transformation-function 'upcase)
in your `.emacs' file.
To reproduce the problem:
emacs -Q
C-x C-f a.html RET
M-x set-variable RET sgml-transformation-function RET upcase RET
C-c C-t
From: Bill Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org
Subject: Local variables list is not properly terminated
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--text follows this line--
My .emacs file issues this call:
(find-file ~/.rosetta.txt nil) ;; Originally, I left the 'nil'
off, to no
;; Declaring and initializing local variables:
-- Declaring and initializing local variables:
These lines are problematic. You should remove the colons, at least,
otherwise Emacs will consider them as start of the local variables
section and search for its end.
In info-mode, could the url buttonizing do https forms too?
Eg. in
C-h i g (mh-e) MH FAQ and Support
the plain http url (first para) is buttonized, but the https one (second
para) isn't.
*** info.el 17 May 2007 10:46:13 +1000 1.502
--- info.el 17 May 2007 15:08:04 +1000
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kenichi Handa wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Stallman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If people have doubts that changing that syntax table is generally
correct, what about the previous patch that alters just the
particular function?
At the moment, I don't have
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Kenichi Handa (2007-04-17) wrote:-
I found a suspicious code and just installed a patch. Could
you please try with the latest source? The page
www.6park.com has a character U+25CF (BLACK CIRCLE) near the
center of
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Katsumi Yamaoka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, my suggestion it to do that and see if it works well if
no one can investigate the code and RFC-822.
The way I posted, to make the syntax of all non-ASCII characters
`word', has a weakness. It is not effective to
10 matches
Mail list logo
