In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If people have doubts that changing that syntax table is generally > correct, what about the previous patch that alters just the > particular function? At the moment, I don't have a time to study the code and his patch. So, I can't doubt nor be sure on anything. But, in general, I think we can treat all non-ASCII characters as the same way in a mail address. And, if mail-extr.el utilizes a syntax table to parse a mail address, I think setting all non-ASCII characters to the same syntax (in the current case, word) is the right thing. So, my suggestion it to do that and see if it works well if no one can investigate the code and RFC-822. --- Kenichi Handa [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ emacs-pretest-bug mailing list emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
