Pete,
Here's another thought for whatever it's worth: Do you get the same
result if you make your own copy of the logging module? If you do,
can you, er, log from it to see just what it's doing?
Regards,
Matt
___
Email-SIG mailing list
Email-SIG@python.
Hi Matt,
thanks for your hints.
On Sonntag, 12. Juni 2016 13:01:13 Matthew Dixon Cowles wrote:
> Pete,
>
> > Note, that the subject line is missing. In my real filter, it left
> > the current execution frame, and execution continued one or two
> > level up the stack.
>
> The only thing I've run
Pete,
> Note, that the subject line is missing. In my real filter, it left
> the current execution frame, and execution continued one or two
> level up the stack.
The only thing I've run into that's like that is when an exception is
raised in a function that I didn't think would do that and was c
[This mail is intentionally hand wrapped..]
On Freitag, 10. Juni 2016 17:54:34 Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2016 18:37:54 Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> >
> > Let's see, how this goes.
>
> Hmm, compat32 and Python3 start to get in my way in no funny ways.
Okay, got it working n
On Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2016 18:37:54 Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2016 10:37:41 R. David Murray wrote:
> > Right, in my previous note I was talking about people not using the
> > new policies. The compat32 code is probably being used by a lot of
> > people and seems to be workin
On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 18:37:54 +0200, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> Apart from all considerations related to streaming/memory
> consumption/assembly, IMHO the weakest spot of the email package is header
> handling: the magic formula
>
> str(email.header.make_header(email.header.decode_header(msg['
On Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2016 10:37:41 R. David Murray wrote:
>
> Right, in my previous note I was talking about people not using the
> new policies. The compat32 code is probably being used by a lot of
> people and seems to be working well, including having fixed some header
> parsing and folding bu
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 23:04:46 +0200, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> Usually, when I report such problems nowadays, I add a patch proposal for
> fixing the issue, but these issues were overwhelming me. Needless to mention
> the complexity of the email package itself and my reluctance of studying RFCs.
[Sorry Stephen, wrong key...]
On Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2016 23:42:31 you wrote:
> Hans-Peter Jansen writes:
> > Dear audience,
> >
> > when coming back to this list, I couldn't believe my eyes because
> > of the low volume level, but after rechecking with the archives, I
> > have to accept, it i
On Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2016 10:14:16 Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jun 08, 2016, at 11:56 AM, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> >All these issues were harvested in less than halve an hour. What really
> >troubles me is the quietness around here in the light of this experience.
> >Doesn't people use Python (3) ye
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 23:42:31 +0900, "Stephen J. Turnbull"
wrote:
> It's a complete rewrite from first principles. It's more robust in
> principle and more maintainable in practice, but faced with 100s of
> millions of emails (aka "tsunami of sewage"), the robustness can't be
> guaranteed. I'm w
Hans-Peter Jansen writes:
> Dear audience,
>
> when coming back to this list, I couldn't believe my eyes because
> of the low volume level, but after rechecking with the archives, I
> have to accept, it is that quiet here, a bit too quiet from my
> POV. Hmm.
It's just that very few people (
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 10:14:16 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jun 08, 2016, at 11:56 AM, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
>
> >All these issues were harvested in less than halve an hour. What really
> >troubles me is the quietness around here in the light of this experience.
> >Doesn't people use Python
On Jun 08, 2016, at 11:56 AM, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
>All these issues were harvested in less than halve an hour. What really
>troubles me is the quietness around here in the light of this experience.
>Doesn't people use Python (3) yet/anymore for these kind of tasks? Does
>somebody care? Am
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 11:56:40 +0200, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote:
> All these issues were harvested in less than halve an hour. What really
> troubles me is the quietness around here in the light of this experience.
> Doesn't people use Python (3) yet/anymore for these kind of tasks? Does
Apparentl
Dear audience,
when coming back to this list, I couldn't believe my eyes because of the low
volume level, but after rechecking with the archives, I have to accept, it is
that quiet here, a bit too quiet from my POV. Hmm.
Well, I'm in the course of replacing a special purpose postfix email filte
16 matches
Mail list logo
