On Sat, 14 May 2011 15:19:42 -0700, Glenn Linderman v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com
wrote:
Looks great, conceptually. My only quibble is with the names
.source_value and .decoded: the names are clear, but lengthy (in
combination with stuff before the .). Other possibilities:
.source_value:
On 5/16/2011 1:24 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Sat, 14 May 2011 15:19:42 -0700, Glenn Lindermanv+pyt...@g.nevcal.com
wrote:
Looks great, conceptually. My only quibble is with the names
.source_value and .decoded: the names are clear, but lengthy (in
combination with stuff before the .).
On May 17, 2011, at 12:52 AM, Oleg Broytman wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 04:24:21PM -0400, R. David Murray wrote:
I'd be fine with 'orig', 'source' or
'src', and I don't really care what it is.
[skip]
I will rename 'decoded' to 'value'.
My votes are for 'source' and 'value'.
+1
-Barry
On 5/16/2011 1:40 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
I've gone through the RFCs and done some additional googling,
and haven't been able to confirm the answer to this question: what
exactly is the syntax when a group is included in an address-list? (See
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.4).
On Mon, 16 May 2011 13:31:47 -0700, Glenn Linderman v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com
wrote:
Given than, 'orig' or 'src' bubble to the top of my list of preferences.
Given the votes so far and my own preference, I think I'll go with
'source'. I don't think saving a few characters is worth it.
Seems like
R. David Murray writes:
I've gone through the RFCs and done some additional googling,
and haven't been able to confirm the answer to this question: what
exactly is the syntax when a group is included in an address-list? (See
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.4). The question
