Re: session management in perl

2001-03-23 Thread Brooklyn Linux Solutions CEO
Mod Perl has nothing to do with Session Management. Cheers Ruben > Hello there... > > I have a doubt regarding the session management in perl. > The entries that I saw in the mailing list were speaking of mod_perl > which I did not understand. > --

Re: Embperl in Authentication Phase

2001-03-23 Thread Gerald Richter
> namely that my characters are being escaped; for example & is being converted in to &. > In normal embperl I'm able to turn this off with a simple $escmode=0, but this doesn't seem > to have any effect under AuthCookie. This should work under AuthCookie as well. Try to read back $escmode (e.g.

Re: Caching question

2001-03-23 Thread Gerald Richter
> > [root@server /root]# free >total used free shared buffers cached > Mem: 516952 503816 13136 59912 87784 335176 > -/+ buffers/cache:80856 436096 > Swap:10281206801027440 > This means that you actual only use 503816

Re: Caching question

2001-03-23 Thread Neil Gunton
> Your system does seem to be ok to me though. Thanks to you and the others who replied. It's good to understand how the memory useage works. I have since seen the "used" number drop to about half its previous value, so I guess Linux occasionally does housecleaning... Thanks again. -Neil

session management in perl

2001-03-23 Thread tom joseph
Hello there... I have a doubt regarding the session management in perl. The entries that I saw in the mailing list were speaking of mod_perl which I did not understand. I am not using mod_perl. I use the Apache::Session module and tie a hash to it and add session variables to the hash as soon a

Re: Caching question

2001-03-23 Thread Wim Kerkhoff
Andre Landwehr wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 03:19:51PM -0500, Neil Gunton wrote: > > And moreover, I could see it starting to use swap space, which > > simply should not happen with the kind of minimal load the machine is > > under. > > It's quite common (at least in Linux, don't know abou

Re: Caching question

2001-03-23 Thread Wim Kerkhoff
Neil Gunton wrote: > > Sorry to bother you again, but I want to make sure that I am reading > this right. This is the output from the 'free' command: > > [root@server /root]# free >total used free shared buffers cached > Mem: 516952 503816 13136

Re: Caching question

2001-03-23 Thread ___cliff rayman___
Neil Gunton wrote: > Sorry to bother you again, but I want to make sure that I am reading > this right. This is the output from the 'free' command: > > [root@server /root]# free >total used free shared buffers cached > Mem: 516952 503816 13136 599

Embperl in Authentication Phase

2001-03-23 Thread Michael Smith
Dear All,   I'm using embperl in the authentication phase, via Apache::AuthCookie to produce a login page.  It actually works pretty well but I'm experiencing one problem that I can't seem to get round - namely that my characters are being escaped; for example & is being converted in to &. 

Re: Caching question

2001-03-23 Thread Neil Gunton
Sorry to bother you again, but I want to make sure that I am reading this right. This is the output from the 'free' command: [root@server /root]# free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 516952 503816 13136 59912 87784 335176 -/+ buffer

Re: Caching question

2001-03-23 Thread Neil Gunton
Andre, thanks for the reply. I am noticing, using the 'top' utility, that the "memory used" number is way up there this morning, around 469576K. The total mem is 512Mb, so obviously something is taking up a lot of memory. I tried shutting down all the main processes that might use a lot of memory

Re: question on inheriting subroutines from n level deep pages

2001-03-23 Thread Gerald Richter
> let's say you have a page A that defines subroutine Do > another page B includes page A but is later included by page C. How can > you utilize the subroutine defined in A from page C? Thanks > You need to import the subs in C: [- Execute ({inputfile => 'A', import => 1}) -] Gerald --

Re: Caching question

2001-03-23 Thread Andre Landwehr
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 03:19:51PM -0500, Neil Gunton wrote: > And moreover, I could see it starting to use swap space, which > simply should not happen with the kind of minimal load the machine is > under. It's quite common (at least in Linux, don't know about other unices) to use swap space eve